Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian president intends to visit Ground Zero: "he'll go despite NYPD rejection"
WABC-TV ^ | September 19, 2007 | WABC

Posted on 09/20/2007 10:33:38 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-302 next last
To: Tulsa Ramjet

Particularly in light of the capture of an Iranian Special Forces soldier in Northen Iraq todays Bush should let Ahmadenedoodoo know right now that if he sets foot on the soil of New York City anywhere other than the UN, he will be arrested and turned over to NYFD, NYPD and families of 9/11 victims for disposition.


41 posted on 09/20/2007 10:50:43 AM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
I don’t think New Yorkers will allow this to happen. There’s probably going to be a riot of epic proportions.

You mean the same New Yorkers that host the UN, elected Hillary, allowed Rudy to ban nudie bars and ticket jaywalkers, and Bloomberg to ban smoking and trans fats? Yeah, real tough guys, those New Yorkers.

42 posted on 09/20/2007 10:51:19 AM PDT by Freedom_no_exceptions (No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I suppose you’re right in a sense. Just wonder what constituted a ban-worthy post. Was it simply saying “geee...wonder what would happen if the cab exploded” or an outright “I’m gonna __________ and then _______________ when he’s there” type of thing?


43 posted on 09/20/2007 10:51:32 AM PDT by RockinRight (Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: Tulsa Ramjet

I don’t get it. Even though Ahmadinejad wants/intends to visit Ground Zero, why must we allow him to do so? Why can’t/don’t we (Americans) determine his itinerary when he’s in our country?


45 posted on 09/20/2007 10:52:58 AM PDT by muglywump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

PING!


46 posted on 09/20/2007 10:53:11 AM PDT by sofaman ("If someone says that they are going to kill you, believe them." Benjamin Netanyahu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

What, he threatens to wipe a people of the map, send’s suicide bombers into crowds of innocents, since when is he sensitive to death?


47 posted on 09/20/2007 10:53:32 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

well, if he insists. one is sure that his marxist allies in the u.s. congress will stand up for his desire to trespass on u.s. territory. (he kills the troops and the democrats “loathe” them.)


48 posted on 09/20/2007 10:53:44 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
That a foreigner can act against the wishes of our authorities just shows that we have lost our sovereignty.

You forgot to add "...and it's all because of Bush." It is Bush after all that isn't upholding his pledge to "Protect this Nation against ALL enemies, both FOREIGN and domestic."

I for one and sick and tired of this open borders crap!
49 posted on 09/20/2007 10:54:25 AM PDT by Arcy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

I actually heard a caller on Bill Bennett’s show say something to the same effect this morning. To my astonishment, Bennett not only didn’t object to the forceful language, but he suggested it was understandable and reasonable. And this is probably the most calm, even-tempered man in broadcasting today.

We’re all thinking the same thing today. I’m sure Jim Rob feels the same way. But there are legal implications for him and the site. We have to take that into consideration.


50 posted on 09/20/2007 10:54:32 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Maybe we can present him with a basket of chinese-made mattel toys to take back with him to play with on the plane. You know, that goofy truck character from “Cars.”


51 posted on 09/20/2007 10:54:45 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
We’re all thinking the same thing today. I’m sure Jim Rob feels the same way. But there are legal implications for him and the site. We have to take that into consideration.

Understood, but if Bin Laden is next to request a visit I may not be so understanding.

52 posted on 09/20/2007 10:56:16 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Arcy

The President said.. you’re either with the terrorists or against them.

I guess the U.S. is with them?


53 posted on 09/20/2007 10:57:39 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

What legal implications?


54 posted on 09/20/2007 10:58:27 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Sorry, Ahmanutjob. The street is closed.


55 posted on 09/20/2007 10:59:16 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

What do you all say that this small little man get a good old American Welcome? We need to practice what he denies his people, loud and aggressive “FREE SPEECH”

It would be wonderful to see this midget and his gang run like cowards back to the UN.


56 posted on 09/20/2007 11:00:51 AM PDT by c21sac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

“What legal implications?”

Well, that fact that if the threats continue to be posted, then ‘Nutjob will get an attorney, and then before you know it, we see Kato Kaelin’s mug on that hard-news show Fox giving an analysis of the situation.


57 posted on 09/20/2007 11:01:15 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Comments about his well being are a mistake IMO.

Look, if someone wants to say that the U.S. should take him out while he sits in Iraq, that isn’t going to be taken as threat. Talking about what Citizens should/plan/or are going to do here, is another matter. And I’d agree, “should” is probably iffy.

He is a despicable man. He has done and is doing despicable things. He is an enemy of this nation. He is an enemy of other nations as well. He is a destabalizing force. He is a pariah among leaders.

The U.N. shouldn’t allow him to address the assembly. He shouldn’t be allowed to step foot in the building. He shouldn’t be allowed to step foot in this nation, let alone Ground Zero.

There’s plenty to take this guy to task for on point. Threats just don’t help anyone.

One of these days I hope he gets what’s coming to him, but when that day comes, I want it to be a citizen in a jet, not some guy on our streets.


58 posted on 09/20/2007 11:02:14 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Sorry Hillderella, but the Hsu fits... and king Lerach would like a call. < wicked witch laughter >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Is there a statute of limitations for what Ahmadinnerjacket did with our countrymen during the hostage crisis of the Carter years?

If not, he’s a wanted TERRORIST.

Currently, he is directly responsible for the death of U.S. soldiers.

That makes him a current TERRORIST.

What’s the best kind of terrorist?

Just askin’


59 posted on 09/20/2007 11:03:05 AM PDT by Son Of The Godfather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son Of The Godfather

Bernie Kerik just held a news conference and said THIS WILL NOT BE HAPPENING.

HE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED NEAR GROUND ZERO.


60 posted on 09/20/2007 11:04:33 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-302 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson