Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dobson Says He Won't Support Thompson
AP ^ | 9/19/07 | Erik Gorski

Posted on 09/19/2007 7:14:10 PM PDT by pissant

DENVER (AP) — James Dobson, one of the nation's most politically influential evangelical Christians, made it clear in a message to friends this week he will not support Republican presidential hopeful Fred Thompson.

In a private e-mail obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, Dobson accuses the former Tennessee senator and actor of being weak on the campaign trail and wrong on issues dear to social conservatives.

"Isn't Thompson the candidate who is opposed to a Constitutional amendment to protect marriage, believes there should be 50 different definitions of marriage in the U.S., favors McCain-Feingold, won't talk at all about what he believes, and can't speak his way out of a paper bag on the campaign trail?" Dobson wrote.

"He has no passion, no zeal, and no apparent 'want to.' And yet he is apparently the Great Hope that burns in the breasts of many conservative Christians? Well, not for me, my brothers. Not for me!"

The founder and chairman of Colorado Springs-based Focus on the Family, Dobson draws a radio audience in the millions, many of whom who first came to trust the child psychologist for his conservative Christian advice on child-rearing.

Gary Schneeberger, a Focus on the Family spokesman, confirmed that Dobson wrote the e-mail. Schneeberger declined to comment further, saying it would be inappropriate because Dobson's comments about presidential candidates are made as an individual and not as a representative of Focus on the Family, a nonprofit organization restricted from partisan politics.

Dobson's strong words about Thompson underscore the frustration and lack of unity among Christian conservatives about the GOP field. Some Christian right leaders have pinned their hopes on Thompson, describing him as a Southern-fried Ronald Reagan. But others have voiced doubts in recent weeks about some of the same issues Dobson highlighted: his position on gay marriage and support for the 2002 McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation.

Dobson and other Christian conservatives support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would bar gay marriage nationally. Thompson has said he would support a constitutional amendment that would prohibit states from imposing their gay marriage laws on other states, which falls well short of that.

Karen Hanretty, a spokeswoman for the Thompson campaign, said Wednesday in response to the Dobson e-mail: "Fred Thompson has a 100 percent pro-life voting record. He believes strongly in returning authority to the levels of government closest to families and communities, protecting states from intrusion by the federal government and activist judges.

"We're confident as voters get to know Fred, they'll appreciate his conservative principles, and he is the one conservative in this race who can win the nomination and can go on to defeat the Democratic nominee."

In his e-mail addressed "Dear friends," Dobson includes the text of a recent news story highlighting Thompson's statement that while he was baptized in the Church of Christ, he does not attend church regularly and won't speak about his faith on the stump.

U.S. News and World Report quoted Dobson earlier this year as questioning Thompson's commitment to the Christian faith — comments Dobson contended were not put in proper context. Dobson in this week's e-mail writes that suppositions "about the former senator's never having professed to be a Christian are turning out to be accurate in substance."

Earlier this year, Dobson said he wouldn't back John McCain because of the Arizona senator's opposition to a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

Later, Dobson wrote on a conservative news Web site that he wouldn't support former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani should he win the Republican nomination. Dobson called Giuliani an "unapologetic supporter of abortion on demand" and criticized him for signing a bill in 1997 creating domestic-partnership benefits in New York City.

Last week, Dobson announced on his radio show that the IRS had cleared him of accusations that he had endangered his organization's nonprofit status by endorsing Republican candidates in 2004. The IRS said Dobson, who endorsed President Bush's re-election bid, was acting as an individual and not on behalf of the nonprofit group.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: b4dh; byebyefred; christianvote; dobson; elections; firstnamebasis; fotf; fred; fredthompson; jamesdobson; pissyfit; spartansixdelta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,341-1,343 next last
To: pissant

I usually try to respond to announcements like this with a reasoned and considered statement.

In this case I’ll just say that Dobson is a retard.


61 posted on 09/19/2007 7:39:07 PM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

yep.

it’s going to be 1992 and 1996

all over.

praise the ford!

hello, hillary.


62 posted on 09/19/2007 7:39:15 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Your grecian formula, tan-in-a-bottle socialist couldn’t beat Hillary in his own wildest dreams. Sell that silliness elsewhere. Nobody’s buying here.


63 posted on 09/19/2007 7:39:40 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Yeah, especially the Republican ones like Romney and Rudy.


64 posted on 09/19/2007 7:40:24 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Well, he had better mark Romney off the list too.


65 posted on 09/19/2007 7:40:25 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

He’ll come around on Fred or he’ll face irrelevancy.


66 posted on 09/19/2007 7:40:55 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

btt with no comment.


67 posted on 09/19/2007 7:41:11 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: steve86

I used to have a lot of respect for the Dobsons but they have apparently become like the Pharisees. I think it’s fascinating that Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney have this thing in common. Ha!


68 posted on 09/19/2007 7:41:22 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Romney Rocks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

>Earlier this year, Dobson said he wouldn[’t back John McCain because of the Arizona senator’s opposition to a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.<

Well, seeing as there is only one, maybe two now, Republican candidates running who are Conservatives with Biblical principles, Dr. Dobson will no doubt vote for either Duncan Hunter or Alan Keyes.


69 posted on 09/19/2007 7:41:28 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Agreed. :)


70 posted on 09/19/2007 7:41:28 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: pissant

there is one point to make and that is you can’t attack McCain solely because of Mccain-feingold and then support Fred when he has also supported that bill.

I’m for fred or Hunter but I was never ‘anti’ mccain and I am sure that many who would rather let hillary win over rudy would still vote for mccain.


71 posted on 09/19/2007 7:41:41 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Your wrong... that isn’t 153 votes!! This is BIG!!! I value Dr. Dobson’s opinion and insight and will not support Fred!Dr. Dobsons’ voice in the Christian Community in this generation is like the influence of Billy Graham in the 50’s!


72 posted on 09/19/2007 7:41:48 PM PDT by pollywog (Joshua 1:9 Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

They would do the most damage to the conservative movement.


73 posted on 09/19/2007 7:41:50 PM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The exalted leader of the far right wing sheeple has spoken, BAH, BAH, BAH I take my marching orders from Pat Robinson..............

Whats Dobbin scared of a new church called Fred........

74 posted on 09/19/2007 7:41:54 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

It was on Dobson’s radio show that Newt ‘confessed’ all his private sins. Like his affair while critizing Clinton.


75 posted on 09/19/2007 7:42:02 PM PDT by JRochelle ( Winkle Paw is a Hillary donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

Wow! This might get Duncan to a whole percentage point! Maybe even one and a HALF!!!


76 posted on 09/19/2007 7:42:15 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Things are going to be fluid I think for another couple of months. The ‘values voters’ in Farah’s debate picked Huckabee by a wide margin. Something ain’t right.


77 posted on 09/19/2007 7:43:14 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
btt with no comment.

Well stated. I agree. :)

78 posted on 09/19/2007 7:43:30 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

was going to ask that myself...just who would he support? not one candidate is going to hold to his ideals and if they did they probably wouldnt have a chance of winning in the national election. Dobson comes across as an all or nothing man which makes me just as uncomfortable as some libs.


79 posted on 09/19/2007 7:43:32 PM PDT by donnab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

I agree. If liberals with an R next to their name win, they have the power to set it back for generations. Liberals with a D next to their name only set it back to the next election.


80 posted on 09/19/2007 7:43:55 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,341-1,343 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson