Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amendment to Limit Troop Deployments Faces Long Odds(Just lost in Senate)
Congressional Quarterly ^ | Sept. 19, 2007 | Sept. 19, 2007

Posted on 09/19/2007 3:07:34 PM PDT by mdittmar

An amendment to mandate minimum rest times for U.S. troops between deployments faced long odds Wednesday after an influential Republican senator switched his position and said he would vote against it.

John W. Warner, R-Va., a senior Armed Services Committee member who voted for the amendment by Jim Webb, D-Va., when it last came to the floor in July, said he had changed his mind. He said the ranks of military specialists are so thin in many positions that commanders on the ground would be seriously hobbled by mandatory “dwell times” between deployments.

Bush administration officials have been furiously lobbying moderate Republican senators to oppose the measure.

The Webb amendment would require military personnel to be given at least as much time at home as they spend deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. National Guard and reserve forces would have to be allowed three years at home for each one at war.

As the Senate debated the measure, the operations chiefs of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Army huddled with a small group of centrist Republicans in a Russell Senate Office Building room.

The group included Republicans John W. Warner of Virginia, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania. Afterwards, several sounded as if they had been won over.

“My goal is not to create a management nightmare for our commanders,” said Alexander.

Warner announced on the floor that he would oppose the measure. He was one of 56 senators who voted for an earlier version in July, leaving Webb four votes short of the 60 needed to overcome a GOP filibuster.

In the face of another filibuster, several additional Republicans had been weighing a vote change to support the new proposal. But Warner’s switch the other direction is likely to bolster the administration’s case against it.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 110th; iraq; rotation; webb
Only 56 votes,Sorry dems,you lose again.
1 posted on 09/19/2007 3:07:37 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

But it does show you how important this next election is for the security of the USA and our war against the terror-scum.


2 posted on 09/19/2007 3:11:12 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Ever since Webb proposed this, I have been trying to imagine the comments that Patton or MacArthur would have made had a similar amendment been offered during World War II. The mind boggles. And Webb’s mind hasn’t functioned properly since shortly after he wrote that book on the Scots-Irish. Interesting also that the pompous old fool, Warner, changed his mind.


3 posted on 09/19/2007 3:11:32 PM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
four votes short of the 60 needed to overcome a GOP filibuster

And far short of the 67 needed to overcome a presidential veto. Losers.

4 posted on 09/19/2007 4:24:41 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Interesting also that the pompous old fool, Warner, changed his mind.

He may have been feeling the heat from his constituents at home, who've no doubt awakened to the fact that he's an idiot.

5 posted on 09/19/2007 4:25:49 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

HAHA Dingy, you lose again. Take a hint. Why don’t you give up your push to give up? You got what you wanted—DEFEAT!


6 posted on 09/19/2007 6:16:59 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (If you can't say something intelligent, don't say anything at all. Congress goes silent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
But it does show you how important this next election is for the security of the USA and our war against the terror-scum.

If security of the US was important in the WOT, Bush would have secured the borders long ago, or we would have replaced him with another Republican.
7 posted on 09/19/2007 7:44:58 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson