Skip to comments.
House passes mortgage plan
AP via Yahoo! News ^
| 9/18/07
| MARCY GORDON
Posted on 09/18/2007 1:10:31 PM PDT by libertarianPA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Why not just pass a comprehensive bill that says there are no risks in life anymore! Not in a legally binding contract... nothing. That way, I can haul my butt over to Atlantic City and bet everything I have on one hand of poker and get it all back the next day by bleeding the taxpayers!
Utopia realized with the stroke of a congressional pen. Holy crap!
To: libertarianPA
“Struggling homeowners” who had no business buying something they couldn’t afford in the first place.
Gotta keep that bubble inflated.
2
posted on
09/18/2007 1:12:52 PM PDT
by
mgstarr
("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
To: libertarianPA
so we should all quit paying our mortgages now so we can get these grants?
3
posted on
09/18/2007 1:14:19 PM PDT
by
absolootezer0
(stop repeat offenders- don't re-elect them!)
To: libertarianPA
Why not just pass a law voiding all contracts? Contracts are too picky and mean anyway, they force people to make tradeoffs, and they presuppose that both parties are moral agents. These draconian conditions are getting in the way of things like free health care for everybody!
4
posted on
09/18/2007 1:15:00 PM PDT
by
oblomov
To: libertarianPA
Corporate utopia. This is a move by the financers for a subsidy from the American public. They don’t want to foreclose and take the properties, for one, they allowed encouraged overvaluations in the first place. Also, why not get free money from the govt.? All one needs is a “crisis”.
5
posted on
09/18/2007 1:15:31 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: libertarianPA
Dang it! I knew I shoulda bought that 6000 sq ft house with the 50 acre horse farm even if it was waaaay over my head. Will they bail me out if I do something stooopid now? Surely I can find something I can’t afford.
6
posted on
09/18/2007 1:17:52 PM PDT
by
ladtx
( "I don't know how I got over the hill without getting to the top." - - Will Rogers)
To: Shermy; libertarianPA
Right, bailouts just encourage more bad behavior.
To: libertarianPA
Bend over, cuz here it comes! Another transfer payment from the productive members of society to the unproductive members. The gov’t has absolutely no business underwriting loans in the private sector...none. Furthermore, why should my money go to investors who put money into high-yield companies knowing full-well that high-risk accompanies high yields. Why should I subsidize them?
8
posted on
09/18/2007 1:18:32 PM PDT
by
econjack
To: libertarianPA
The American dream is in peril for many families in this country as foreclosures rise and dreams shatter," Congress may not be able to stop foreclosures from rising, but they can damn well keep dreams from shattering. From this point forward, all dreams must be made of shatter-proof polycarbonate! Shards of shattered dreams are the leading cause of lacerations among obese children under the poverty line!
9
posted on
09/18/2007 1:18:53 PM PDT
by
oblomov
To: mgstarr
The House on Tuesday approved a plan to expand federal backing of mortgages in hopes of helping struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure. So, I should get MORE because I bought a home within my means & pay my mortgage every month, riiiight?
10
posted on
09/18/2007 1:21:16 PM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: ladtx
Hurry! Maybe you’ll get in under the wire.
11
posted on
09/18/2007 1:28:25 PM PDT
by
abigailsmybaby
(I was born with nothing. So far I have most of it left.)
To: libertarianPA
The scum in Congress probably figure that if they do this, it will prop up states’ proeprty taxes - thus delaying or deferring additional Federal taxes going to the states; allowing Congress more time to play with Federal dollars.
12
posted on
09/18/2007 1:34:00 PM PDT
by
ikka
To: libertarianPA
The margin is veto proof. I think the President will sign some form of the legislation when it reaches his desk. The political pressure to avert subprime foreclosures is too strong to avert.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
13
posted on
09/18/2007 1:38:32 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: GeorgefromGeorgia
Exactly. How does this keep mortgage companies from issuing risky loans? It doesn’t. In fact, it encourages it, because our tax dollars guarantee the loan. And I love the double-speak. This is NOT designed to protect homeowners or keep them in their homes, it’s designed to bail out mortgage companies when homeowners default.
To: GeorgefromGeorgia
Yep, just like today’s action by the Fed will do.
15
posted on
09/18/2007 1:40:23 PM PDT
by
biff
To: libertarianPA
House Republicans sharply objected to a $300 million-a-year fund for grants for affordable rental housing and homeownership assistance for low-income families, which would be financed from FHA revenues Ther just never seems to be enough welfare.
16
posted on
09/18/2007 1:48:50 PM PDT
by
umgud
To: libertarianPA
I’m OK with reasonable amending of FHA guidelines. The other stuff I’d toss.
17
posted on
09/18/2007 1:50:01 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
To: Hoffer Rand
FHA is FHA. It’s been around for years.
Lenders have already tightened non-FHA guidelines and this bill won’t affect that at all.
18
posted on
09/18/2007 1:50:55 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
To: libertarianPA
They need to stop going to the casino and playing the lottery with their house payment.
19
posted on
09/18/2007 1:52:31 PM PDT
by
Sybeck1
(I like Rodney Carrington's recipe for World Peace.)
To: absolootezer0
so we should all quit paying our mortgages now so we can get these grants? I guarantee I will quit paying my debts and declare bankruptcy if these speculators get bailed out (I technically could declare bk because retirement assets in my state aren't counted).
20
posted on
09/18/2007 1:53:15 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson