Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House passes mortgage plan
AP via Yahoo! News ^ | 9/18/07 | MARCY GORDON

Posted on 09/18/2007 1:10:31 PM PDT by libertarianPA

WASHINGTON - The House on Tuesday approved a plan to expand federal backing of mortgages in hopes of helping struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure.

The bill, which passed the House, 348-72, would allow the Federal Housing Administration, which insures mortgages for low- and middle-income borrowers, to back refinanced loans for tens of thousands of borrowers who are delinquent on payments because their mortgages are resetting to sharply higher rates from low initial "teaser" levels.

The measure, which exceeds limits favored by the Bush administration, is Congress' first stand-alone bill in response to the mortgage-market tumult of the summer, which came amid a rising tide of defaults and foreclosures. The Senate last week passed spending legislation that includes $200 million to provide aid to nonprofits and other groups that offer counseling and information to help homeowners avoid foreclosure.

House Republicans sharply objected to a $300 million-a-year fund for grants for affordable rental housing and homeownership assistance for low-income families, which would be financed from FHA revenues — a plan also opposed by the Bush administration. But House Republicans mostly were swept along in the vote for the bill, whose overall thrust they endorsed in the face of the mortgage crisis.

"The American dream is in peril for many families in this country as foreclosures rise and dreams shatter," Rep. Betty Sutton, a Democrat from Ohio, a state particularly hard-hit by the default wave, declared in House debate before the vote.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: bailout; foreclosures; mortage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Why not just pass a comprehensive bill that says there are no risks in life anymore! Not in a legally binding contract... nothing. That way, I can haul my butt over to Atlantic City and bet everything I have on one hand of poker and get it all back the next day by bleeding the taxpayers!

Utopia realized with the stroke of a congressional pen. Holy crap!

1 posted on 09/18/2007 1:10:34 PM PDT by libertarianPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

“Struggling homeowners” who had no business buying something they couldn’t afford in the first place.

Gotta keep that bubble inflated.


2 posted on 09/18/2007 1:12:52 PM PDT by mgstarr ("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

so we should all quit paying our mortgages now so we can get these grants?


3 posted on 09/18/2007 1:14:19 PM PDT by absolootezer0 (stop repeat offenders- don't re-elect them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Why not just pass a law voiding all contracts? Contracts are too picky and mean anyway, they force people to make tradeoffs, and they presuppose that both parties are moral agents. These draconian conditions are getting in the way of things like free health care for everybody!


4 posted on 09/18/2007 1:15:00 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Corporate utopia. This is a move by the financers for a subsidy from the American public. They don’t want to foreclose and take the properties, for one, they allowed encouraged overvaluations in the first place. Also, why not get free money from the govt.? All one needs is a “crisis”.


5 posted on 09/18/2007 1:15:31 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Dang it! I knew I shoulda bought that 6000 sq ft house with the 50 acre horse farm even if it was waaaay over my head. Will they bail me out if I do something stooopid now? Surely I can find something I can’t afford.


6 posted on 09/18/2007 1:17:52 PM PDT by ladtx ( "I don't know how I got over the hill without getting to the top." - - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; libertarianPA

Right, bailouts just encourage more bad behavior.


7 posted on 09/18/2007 1:18:18 PM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA
Bend over, cuz here it comes! Another transfer payment from the productive members of society to the unproductive members. The gov’t has absolutely no business underwriting loans in the private sector...none. Furthermore, why should my money go to investors who put money into high-yield companies knowing full-well that high-risk accompanies high yields. Why should I subsidize them?
8 posted on 09/18/2007 1:18:32 PM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA
The American dream is in peril for many families in this country as foreclosures rise and dreams shatter,"

Congress may not be able to stop foreclosures from rising, but they can damn well keep dreams from shattering. From this point forward, all dreams must be made of shatter-proof polycarbonate! Shards of shattered dreams are the leading cause of lacerations among obese children under the poverty line!

9 posted on 09/18/2007 1:18:53 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr
The House on Tuesday approved a plan to expand federal backing of mortgages in hopes of helping struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure.

So, I should get MORE because I bought a home within my means & pay my mortgage every month, riiiight?

10 posted on 09/18/2007 1:21:16 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

Hurry! Maybe you’ll get in under the wire.


11 posted on 09/18/2007 1:28:25 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby (I was born with nothing. So far I have most of it left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

The scum in Congress probably figure that if they do this, it will prop up states’ proeprty taxes - thus delaying or deferring additional Federal taxes going to the states; allowing Congress more time to play with Federal dollars.


12 posted on 09/18/2007 1:34:00 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA
The margin is veto proof. I think the President will sign some form of the legislation when it reaches his desk. The political pressure to avert subprime foreclosures is too strong to avert.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

13 posted on 09/18/2007 1:38:32 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia

Exactly. How does this keep mortgage companies from issuing risky loans? It doesn’t. In fact, it encourages it, because our tax dollars guarantee the loan. And I love the double-speak. This is NOT designed to protect homeowners or keep them in their homes, it’s designed to bail out mortgage companies when homeowners default.


14 posted on 09/18/2007 1:38:45 PM PDT by Hoffer Rand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia

Yep, just like today’s action by the Fed will do.


15 posted on 09/18/2007 1:40:23 PM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA
House Republicans sharply objected to a $300 million-a-year fund for grants for affordable rental housing and homeownership assistance for low-income families, which would be financed from FHA revenues

Ther just never seems to be enough welfare.

16 posted on 09/18/2007 1:48:50 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

I’m OK with reasonable amending of FHA guidelines. The other stuff I’d toss.


17 posted on 09/18/2007 1:50:01 PM PDT by RockinRight (Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoffer Rand

FHA is FHA. It’s been around for years.

Lenders have already tightened non-FHA guidelines and this bill won’t affect that at all.


18 posted on 09/18/2007 1:50:55 PM PDT by RockinRight (Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA
They need to stop going to the casino and playing the lottery with their house payment.
19 posted on 09/18/2007 1:52:31 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (I like Rodney Carrington's recipe for World Peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
so we should all quit paying our mortgages now so we can get these grants?

I guarantee I will quit paying my debts and declare bankruptcy if these speculators get bailed out (I technically could declare bk because retirement assets in my state aren't counted).

20 posted on 09/18/2007 1:53:15 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson