St. Rachel the Flattened loses in court again...
This had less to do with Foreign Policiy decisions by the White House, and more to do about how ridiculous it was to sue the bulldozer manufacturer, because Saint Rachel was a dumbass to stand in front of it in the first place...
But I won't wait to hear that analysis out of the 9th Circuit any time soon...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Bean Counter
Wow... and from the 9th circus even. Color me surprised.
2 posted on
09/17/2007 3:37:44 PM PDT by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Bean Counter
Consider how lame their case was that even the nutjob 9th Circuit rejected it! Would someone please post the picture of Nelson saying, “Ha. Ha.”
3 posted on
09/17/2007 3:38:18 PM PDT by
3AngelaD
(They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
To: Bean Counter
Common sense:(1)
Speed bump: (0)
5 posted on
09/17/2007 3:41:14 PM PDT by
Clay Moore
("My daddy says I'm this close to living in the yard." Ralph Wiggum)
To: Bean Counter; Charles.Calthrop
Rachel Corrie threads are always a lot of fun!
7 posted on
09/17/2007 3:42:59 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
("The military Mission has long since been accomplished" -- Harry Reid, April 23, 2007)
To: Bean Counter
8 posted on
09/17/2007 3:44:28 PM PDT by
xjcsa
(Hillary Clinton is nothing more than Karl Marx with huge calves.)
To: Bean Counter
A federal appeals court panel (9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals) has refused to reinstate a lawsuit brought against Caterpillar Inc. by the family of a 23-year-old peace activist crushed to death by an Israeli bulldozer. Excuse me while I pick myself off the floor
9 posted on
09/17/2007 3:46:22 PM PDT by
Popman
(Nothing + Time + Chance = The Universe ---------------------Bridge in Brooklyn for sale - Cheap)
To: Bean Counter
I am sure the family was just flattened by the news -— All their hopes of justice smushed like a bug, ground under the treads of the judicial machinery.
11 posted on
09/17/2007 3:47:14 PM PDT by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
To: Bean Counter
St. Rachel the Flattened"snicker"
12 posted on
09/17/2007 3:47:40 PM PDT by
Popman
(Nothing + Time + Chance = The Universe ---------------------Bridge in Brooklyn for sale - Cheap)
To: Bean Counter
Looks like Rachel didn’t have much of a chance as a “red diaper doper baby” being raised by the cretins she drew as parents...
13 posted on
09/17/2007 3:49:14 PM PDT by
river rat
(Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Bean Counter
Here's a better headline
Caterpillar crushes Corrie suit
To: Bean Counter
Someone please tell me Rachel was an only child....
I would hope this gene pool came to a dead end....
15 posted on
09/17/2007 3:51:09 PM PDT by
river rat
(Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Bean Counter
You mean if I take a match and light up the Corrie’s home they’ll sue the match company?
Sheer idiocy.
17 posted on
09/17/2007 3:54:24 PM PDT by
Bullish
( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
To: Bean Counter
So they were turned down ... flat.
23 posted on
09/17/2007 4:11:33 PM PDT by
GulfBreeze
(Support America, Support Duncan Hunter for President.)
To: Bean Counter
Please...please...PLEASE...somebody tell me that that whackjob’s family wasn’t *really* trying to sue the manufacturer of the bulldozer that ran over the whackjob?
24 posted on
09/17/2007 4:15:46 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
To: Bean Counter
Now she will not swell the rout
Of lasses who are 'dozer grout,
Haters whom their brains outran
And their guts lie drying in the sand.
[With apologies to AE Housman]
27 posted on
09/17/2007 4:56:01 PM PDT by
IronJack
(=)
To: Bean Counter
Cindy and Craig Corrie, sued Peoria, Ill.-based Caterpillar, which manufactured the bulldozer, seeking to hold the company civilly liable for aiding and abetting human rights violations — the destruction of civilian homes. Stupid beyond words...did an attorney represent them in this? He/she should be disbarred if so.
To: Bean Counter
Did they indict Sir Issac Newton?
It's all his fault anyway.
I mean it's Bushs fault Heil Hillary!
29 posted on
09/17/2007 5:02:34 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(Did you know that everyday mexican gays sneak into this country and unplug our brain dead ladies HJS)
To: Bean Counter
9th Circus?
30 posted on
09/17/2007 5:10:42 PM PDT by
VRWC For Truth
(RINO cleaner - the backbone restorer)
To: Libertina; luckymom; Paperdoll; gandalftb; acoulterfan; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; NurdlyPeon; ...
Say WA? Evergreen State ping
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.
33 posted on
09/17/2007 8:10:00 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: Bean Counter
Thank you God for the 9th Circuit. What a stupid lawsuit!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
