Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Slayer ... (a battle Giuliani was born to fight)
American Spectator ^ | 9/17/2007 | Philip Klein

Posted on 09/17/2007 5:11:52 AM PDT by IrishMike

As one of his supporters, actor Robert Duvall, might say: Rudy played this one beautifully.

Last week, all Republican politicians worth their weight came out blasting MoveOn.org for taking out a full-page ad in the New York Times smearing Gen. David Petraeus on the day he was scheduled to deliver his Iraq progress report to Congress. The outrage among conservatives only grew as leading Democrats failed to condemn the ad, Hillary Clinton questioned the general's honesty, and it was disclosed that the far left group was given a drastically reduced advertising rate in the New York Times.

But while other Republicans complained, Rudy Giuliani did something about it. Speaking to reporters in Atlanta on Thursday, Giuliani demanded that the New York Times give his campaign the same discounted rate so it could take out an ad defending Gen. Petraeus and assailing Clinton and MoveOn.org for "character assassination of an American general in a time of war." He also called on the paper to run the ad at the time of his choosing (Friday, the day after President Bush's primetime address to the nation).

The next morning, American liberals had to spit out their soy milk while reading their paper of record over breakfast.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; autocrat; clinton; democrats; electionpresident; elections; giuliani; gungrabbingrino; hillary; hobsonschoice; julieannie; rino; rinorudy; rudy; rudyequalshillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet; Squantos; Vaquero; TheBattman; NCBraveheart
This is the part I liked best about Rooty's Move-on ad story:

Giuliani had to shell out $64,575 for an ad in The New York Times----Rooty "said" the ad was paid for by "contributions" to his presidential campaign.

ROTFLMSO. "Campaign contributions?" Now I've heard everything.

Rooty is a four-carat phony. Giuliani purportedly earns one million a month----he needs campaign contributions to run ads like he needs a hole in the head.

Now, who wants to hazard a guess as to which offshore account Rooty's ad money was transferred from?

Giuliani companies (that we know of) include:

(1) Giuliani Capital Advisors, LLC (AKA Giuliani Partners LLC),
(2) Giuliani Group,
(3) Giuliani-Kerik (re-named Giuliani Security and Safety, after the departure of the tainted ex-Police Commissioner),
(4) Giuliani-Van Essen,
(5) Bracewell & Giuliani LLP law firm (based in Texas with global interests), and,
(6) Giuliani Security & Safety, Asia

Was the ad money from Bracewell & Giuliani's January closings from accounts in Almaty, Kazakhstan (in the Crimea), totalling $1.625 Billion in billings.

Was the ad money from Bracewell & Giuliani's Cintra account? Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., a Spanish transportation company (lobbied for Privatization of Toll Road in Texas)

Was the ad money from Bracewell & Giuliani's Banco Santander Central Hispano, S.A. (SAN.MC, STD.N) (a bank that traded with a blacklisted Iranian Bank)

Was the ad money from the company account tied to Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chávez, who has called President Bush "the devil." Bracewell & Giuliani lobbies on behalf of Texas-based Citgo Petroleum, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Venezuelan oil company controlled by Chávez.

Sweet Jesus, there's so, many many ways money can travel over the bounding waves to campaign accounts.

21 posted on 09/17/2007 5:39:40 AM PDT by Liz (It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

The beast is the weakest link for the dRATS, target wise.


22 posted on 09/17/2007 5:39:57 AM PDT by IrishMike (As America wins, the Democrats and their apologists lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
“Rudy’s game plan for beating Hitlery is to “out Hillary” her.”

Yes, and that’s also how Rudi plans to beat Fred.

Fred will do the same, attacking Hillary to beat Rudi.

The GOP and conservatives want to know who can beat Hillary. That man will get the nod.

23 posted on 09/17/2007 5:40:46 AM PDT by ryan71 (I refuse to label anything I post, "sarcasm".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Two words: Fred Thompson.

I think FDT is Hillary's dream opponent.

He minimizes her weaknesses (that she's old and tired, because he's older and tireder) and he has a courtly manner which will either inhibit him from kicking her sorry ass OR will take him out of character.

24 posted on 09/17/2007 5:41:26 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of troubles, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

“To me, this election is almost about keeping Hillary out of the White House.”
________________________________________________________

There is no “almost” about it!


25 posted on 09/17/2007 5:42:08 AM PDT by Roccus (Able Danger??? What's an Able Danger???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
aint a lick of difference between Rooty and the Hildabeastie

If Hillary had succeeded David Dinkins on January 1, 1993, would she have:

Cut crime by locking up criminals, or whined about root causes? Chased pornographers out of family neighborhoods, or preached about "artistic freedom"? Denounced the Brooklyn Museum for blasphemy and tried to cut their funding, or attended their dung-covered Virgin Mary exhibit? Cut welfare rolls and made recipients work for their money, or tried to raise taxes further to subsidize an aberrant and destructive lifestyle? Cut the size and shape of the rancid municipal hospital system, or tried to make it the standard for every one? Would she have slapped down the leftist press every single blessed day for eight whole years? Would she have refused NYPD protection for Yasser Arafat, effectively confining him to his hotel and the UN building?

Like him or don't. Vote for whomever you want.

But don't be absurd.

26 posted on 09/17/2007 5:44:55 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of troubles, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

My opinion is that Giuliani has already had his chance to match up with Hillary... For the NY senate seat.

His performance does not persuade me to give him a second chance.


27 posted on 09/17/2007 5:51:45 AM PDT by csivils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Rudy could not get elected mayor of NYC as true conservative.


28 posted on 09/17/2007 5:52:18 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I think we know the answers to your hypotheticals. I will take Rudy in a heartbeat over any of the Dems. No, he is no conservative, but he’s a heckuva lot better than the alternative. Till he gets the nomination - if he gets it I mean - I’m for Hunter.


29 posted on 09/17/2007 5:53:11 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

As a NYer born under LaGuardia and who finally left under Bloomberg, who worked in the streets, backyards, basements and on the rooftops, day and night in Harlem, el Barrio, Washington Heights and the South Bronx for the last year and a half of Dinkins and the first six of Rudy, I’ve come to one conclusion. If Rudy could do for the country just half of what he did for the city, Americans would be pretty happy.


30 posted on 09/17/2007 5:56:30 AM PDT by Roccus (Able Danger??? What's an Able Danger???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
VOTE FOR WHO YOU LIKE....even the absurd.

just check the FR Poll near the bottom of the forum page to see how Rooty stands up in conservative circles....

31 posted on 09/17/2007 6:00:20 AM PDT by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Travis McGee

Wow !

Remind me to never get on your bad side........:o)

Good work Liz.

I personally am sooo tired of the professional pork pandering polidiots I could puke. I would love to see em all flushed from congress in 08 and 2010. This nation is so in need of getting back to it’s basics as a republic it is scary and dangerous. I recently heard of a freeper here (Matt Bracken) being called a nativist by the SPLC in a book review due his authoring a fictional book called Enemies, Foreign and Domestic.

Having no real understanding of the word nativist I know now that it means a person who puts their country before all others . This is a bad thing ? I consider it a prerequisite to be an American. Not a fence sitting hyphenated American but a naturalized American or one born to American parents.

I am a nativist who wants to save my country while our polidiots pretend to want to save the world. Pandering to peons for pennies per se.

Just my opinions of course.......:o)

Stay safe Liz !


32 posted on 09/17/2007 6:02:51 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Rudy is both a socialist and a fascist.....(national socialist? now there is a concept.)

What Rudy did for NY he did by throwing the constitution out the window. Good for NY? Maybe, but as the magazine cover says, his crap, wont play in Peoria.


33 posted on 09/17/2007 6:03:22 AM PDT by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
My money is on Fred. Not on a liberal Northern politician that sought and received the endorsement of the Liberal Party of NYC.
Thats kinda the definition of a Liberal ain’t it?
34 posted on 09/17/2007 6:07:20 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I think Rudy’s past experience of fighting organized crime will serve him well in this fight with organized crime-the Klintoon machine.


35 posted on 09/17/2007 6:07:31 AM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
I don't think Rudy Giuliani was ever running ahead of Clinton in New York.

It's easy to forget that Giuliani probably would have lost a re-election bid for mayor of New York City if he were running in November of 2000.

36 posted on 09/17/2007 6:13:06 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mrmargaritaville

Yep, he knows where all the Clinton bodies are buried, that is for sure!


37 posted on 09/17/2007 6:13:08 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

FNC is having Guiliani-gasms because the nominee for AG is from NY.

Guiliani there are other candidates who are stong or stronger on the war.

NYC Rino vs NYC Socialist is hardly a dramatic race.


38 posted on 09/17/2007 6:15:21 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

I don’t understand your point. Rudy Giuliani is the solution to problems that most Americans don’t have.


39 posted on 09/17/2007 6:15:42 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
just check the FR Poll near the bottom of the forum page to see how Rooty stands up in conservative circles....

Yeah, yeah, I get it.

Here's the thing: we're electing a President of the UNITED STATES.

I understand that Fred is ahead in the race for President of FR. In the race for President of FR, Fred will kill Hillary.

For President of the USA? Not so much.

40 posted on 09/17/2007 6:19:18 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of troubles, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson