Posted on 09/16/2007 4:01:07 PM PDT by decimon
WASHINGTON - President Bush has settled on Michael B. Mukasey, a retired federal judge from New York, to replace Alberto Gonzales as attorney general and will announce his selection Monday, a person familiar with the president's decision said Sunday evening.
Mukasey, who has handled terrorist cases in the U.S. legal system for more than a decade, would become the nation's top law enforcement officer if confirmed by the Senate. Mukasey has the support of some key Democrats, and it appeared Bush was trying to avoid a bruising confirmation battle.
The 66-year-old New York native, who is a judicial adviser to GOP presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani, would take charge of a Justice Department where morale is low following months of investigations into the firings of nine U.S. attorneys and Gonzales' sworn testimony on the Bush administration's terrorist surveillance program.
Key lawmakers, Democrats and Republicans alike, had questioned Gonzales' credibility and competency after he repeatedly testified that he could not recall key events.
The White House refused to comment Sunday. The person familiar with Bush's decision refused to be identified by name because the nomination had not been officially announced.
Bush supporters say Mukasey, who was chief judge of the high-profile courthouse in Manhattan for six years, has impeccable credentials, is a strong, law-and-order jurist, especially on national security issues, and will restore confidence in the Justice Department.
Bush critics see the Mukasey nomination as evidence of Bush's weakened political clout as he heads into the final 15 months of his presidency. It's unclear how Senate Democrats will view Mukasey's credentials, but early indications are that he will face less opposition than a more hardline, partisan candidate like Ted Olson, who was believed to have been a finalist.
Mukasey has received past endorsements from Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, who is from Mukasey's home state. And in 2005, the liberal Alliance for Justice put Mukasey on a list of four judges who, if chosen for the Supreme Court, would show the president's commitment to nominating people who could be supported by both Democrats and Republicans.
Last week, some Senate Democrats threatened to block the confirmation of Olson, who represented Bush before the Supreme Court in the contested 2000 election. Democratic senators have theorized that Bush might nominate Mukasey, in part, because he wanted to avoid a bruising confirmation battle.
The possibility that Bush would pick Mukasey, however, angered some supporters on the GOP's right flank, who have given Mukasey less-than-enthusiastic reviews. Some legal conservatives and Republican activists have expressed reservations about Mukasey's legal record and past endorsements from liberals, and were drafting a strategy to oppose his confirmation even before it became known that Bush had chosen him.
Mukasey was nominated to the federal bench in 1987 by President Reagan. He was chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York before he rejoined the New York law firm of Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler as a partner in September 2006.
He first joined Patterson Belknap in 1976 after serving as assistant U.S. attorney in the criminal division of the Southern District, where he rose to become chief of its official corruption unit. During his 18 years as a judge, Mukasey presided over thousands of cases, including the trial of Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, who was accused of plotting to destroy New York City landmarks.
In the 1996 sentencing of co-conspirators in the case, Mukasey accused the sheik of trying to spread death "in a scale unseen in this country since the Civil War." He then sentenced the blind sheik to life.
The Mukasey nomination could be Bush's last major Cabinet appointment.
Friday was the last day of Gonzales' 2-1/2 years at Justice. Solicitor General Paul Clement will serve as acting attorney general until the Senate confirms Gonzales' replacement. Gonzales' conflicting public statements about the firings of the U.S. prosecutors led Democrats and Republicans alike to question his honesty. Their charges were compounded by his later sworn testimony about the terrorist surveillance program, which was contradicted by FBI Director Robert S. Mueller and former senior Justice Department officials.
A congressional investigation into the firings recently shifted its focus onto whether the attorney general lied to Congress. The Justice Department also has opened an internal investigation into the matters.
At first, the president backed his embattled attorney general. At an Aug. 9 news conference, Bush said, "Why would I hold somebody accountable who has done nothing wrong?"
A little more than two weeks later, Bush announced that he had "reluctantly" accepted the resignation of Gonzales, who followed John Ashcroft's four-year stint as Bush's first attorney general. Bush said Gonzales, his loyal colleague from Texas who was his White House counsel before heading to Justice, had worked tirelessly to keep the nation safe.
Bush said opposition lawmakers treated Gonzales unfairly for political reasons. "It's sad that we live in a time when a talented and honorable person like Alberto Gonzales is impeded from doing important work because his good name was dragged through the mud," Bush said.
What’s the consenus here. I have no knowledge of this person.
Why is what Sen. Schumer and Nan Aron say any more relevant than that President Reagan thought highly enough of Judge Mukasey to put him on the bench? And while I haven’t frankly been interested enough to inform myself about Nan Aron’s views, what Sen. Schumer has said is that Judge Muksaey is a conservative lawyer who puts the rule of law first. That happens to be true. Schumer hasn’t said he sees eye-to-eye with Mukasey on every issue or even, perhaps, most issues. He has, instead, indicated that he believes Mukasey is a brilliant, honest guy who would carry out the business of the Justice Department with competence, fairness and integrity. That also happens to be true. Something is not wrong just because Senator Schumer says it.
And what would our reaction be if Democrats were lining up against the Judge for no better reason than that he was a Reagan appointee? We’d be screaming bloody murder.
My suggestion is that regardless of what Schumer, Aron, Reagan, Kristol, I or anyone else thinks/thought of Mike Mukasey, the best way to judge the Judge is by his own words, which people can read, for example, here and here in addition to about a zillion published opinions.
This is not a hard call.
I don't think there is yet a consensus. The first responses were fairly negative but have been turning more positive as more is learned about Mukasey. Being a Reagan appointment to the federal bench has helped his standing.
That's true. I think all the parties involved must have an eye on the upcoming elections and how what they do might effect the voters. I think the voters are feeling a healthy contempt for everyone in DC.
Contributor | Candidate or PAC | Amount | Date |
MUKASEY, MICHAEL B MR. | GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W (R) | $ 1,000.00 | 06/19/2007 |
NEW YORK , NY 10021 | President | primary | |
PATERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER L.L.P | RUDY GIULIANI PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE INC | ||
MUKASEY, MICHAEL B MR. | GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W (R) | $ 200.00 | 03/13/2007 |
NEW YORK , NY 10021 | President | primary | |
PATERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER L.L.P | RUDY GIULIANI PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE INC | ||
MUKASEY, MICHAEL B | LIEBERMAN, JOSEPH I (D) | $ 1,000.00 | 09/28/2006 |
NEW YORK, NY 10021 | Senate - CT | general | |
PATTERSON, BELNAP, ET AL/ATTORNEY | FRIENDS OF JOE LIEBERMAN | ||
MUKASEY, MILDRED B MS. | GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W (R) | $ 2,100.00 | 12/15/2006 |
NEW YORK, NY 10021 | President | primary | |
PATERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER L.L.P | RUDY GIULIANI PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE INC | ||
MUKASEY, MARC L MR. | GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W (R) | $ (2,300.00) | 06/28/2007 |
NEW YORK , NY 10128 | President | primary | |
BRACEWELL & GIULIANI/LAWYER | RUDY GIULIANI PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE INC | ||
MUKASEY, MARC L MR. | GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W (R) | $ 2,300.00 | 06/28/2007 |
NEW YORK , NY 10128 | President | primary | |
BRACEWELL & GIULIANI/LAWYER | RUDY GIULIANI PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE INC | ||
MUKASEY, MARC L MR. | GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W (R) | $ 2,300.00 | 06/28/2007 |
NEW YORK , NY 10128 | President | general | |
BRACEWELL & GIULIANI/LAWYER | RUDY GIULIANI PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE INC | ||
MUKASEY, MARC MR. | GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W (R) | $ 200.00 | 03/15/2007 |
NEW YORK , NY 10128 | President | primary | |
BRACEWELL & GIULIANI/LAWYER | RUDY GIULIANI PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE INC | ||
MUKASEY, MARC MR. | GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W (R) | $ 2,100.00 | 12/18/2006 |
NEW YORK , NY 10128 | President | primary | |
BRACEWELL & GIULIANI/LAWYER | RUDY GIULIANI PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE INC | ||
MUKASEY, SUSAN MRS. | GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W (R) | $ 200.00 | 03/13/2007 |
NEW YORK , NY 10021 | President | primary | |
SELF-EMPLOYED/TEACHER/ADMINISTRATOR | RUDY GIULIANI PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE INC | ||
MUKASEY, SUSAN MRS. | GIULIANI, RUDOLPH W (R) | $ 2,100.00 | 12/15/2006 |
NEW YORK , NY 10021 | President | primary | |
SELF-EMPLOYED/TEACHER/ADMINISTRATOR | RUDY GIULIANI PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE INC |
Thanks-—nice find.
I was actually looking at some of Hsu’s cohorts and Mukasey happened to pop up in the “most popular searches” at Newsmeat. I clicked on it out of curiosity and was pretty disappointed.
Giuliani's man? That means anti-Second Amendment, pro-sodomy, pro-infanticide, pro-illegal, etc., etc. Perfect selection for Señor Buch.
Why is there no outrage over this nomination?
Wow! Good work! It’s probably too late, but this should answer the question why many of us distrust GWB now.
Thanks! GWB was also going to nominate Rudy pla Kerik for Homeland Security until a fuss was made.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.