Posted on 09/15/2007 8:27:03 PM PDT by monomaniac
By Meg Jalsevac
WASHINGTON, DC, September 14, 2007, (LifeSiteNews.com) - Last week Senator Bob Casey, Jr. (Democrat-Pennsylvania) actively contradicted his largely pro-life campaign promises by voting to approve a funding appropriations bill that would provide US funding to foreign organizations that promote and provide abortions.
The funding bill (HR 2764) would effectively overturn the Mexico City Policy, a foreign aid policy which expressly prohibits the funding of overseas agencies involved in abortion. The policy was first adopted by President Ronald Reagan and continued in the presidency of Bush, Sr. President Clinton repealed the pro-life policy on the first day of his tenure but the current President Bush reinstated it as one of his own initial acts in office.
Casey voted in favor of an amendment sponsored by ardently pro-abortion Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) which not only permitted but actually increased funding to overseas agencies which provide or refer for abortions.
On the same bill, pro-life Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) introduced a conflicting amendment to maintain the Mexico City Policy when allocating foreign funding. Surprisingly, just 20 minutes after his vote to increase funding to foreign abortion agencies, Senator Casey also voted to approve Brownback's amendment and to uphold the Mexico City Policy but later admitted that second vote was an error on his part.
However, according to National Review, just days later Senator Casey returned to the Senate floor to address his contradictory vote saying, "it was my intention to vote 'nay' [to upholding the Mexico City Policy]. Therefore, I ask unanimous consent that I be permitted to change my vote since it will not affect the outcome of that vote."
Diane Gramley, President of the American Family Association of Pennsylvania commented on Casey's recent votes. "Senator Bob Casey, Jr. has recently shown some confusion on his stand on the abortion issue. But apparently he does not have the pro-life convictions that his father did. Bob Casey, Sr. paid for those convictions, but apparently his son does not have the backbone to stand up to pressure from the Democratic leadership."
Senator Casey's father was a prominent and well-respected Pennsylvania Democratic senator who was known for his support of the pro-life movement. Casey, Sr. was denied a speaking opportunity at the 1992 Democratic National Convention because he intended to deliver a speech that illustrated his support of life.
Casey's recent votes are disappointing to pro-life individuals who expected a more pro-life commitment from him especially in light of his campaign promises and 2004 Voter Guide questionnaire answers.
In answer to questions posed by Voter Guide before the 2006 elections, Casey stated that he was "Opposed" in the following categories: Public funding of abortion, a woman's 'right to abortion and tax-funded abortion. Casey also indicated that he "supports legal protection for human life from conception."
According to the National Review Online, Casey's spokesman Larry Smar replied to inquiries regarding the pro-abortion votes saying, "[Senator Casey] does not support public funding of abortion." Smar insisted that Senator Casey is holding true to his campaign promise to work to reduce the overall number of abortions and that the amendment that he voted in favor of "would not allow public funding of abortion."
According to the terminology of Boxer's amendment, the US foreign aid would not be allocated specifically - by the US - for abortion services. However, the aid would go to abortion providing 'family planning' agencies overseas to be used as necessary.
As previously reported by LifeSiteNews.com, Cardinal Justin Regali addressed the Senate before the funding appropriations vote in a letter in which he stated that "the new congressional leadership has endorsed the general consensus that Congress should work to 'reduce abortions.' Unfortunately some of the means proposed, such as expanded contraceptive programs, have been shown to be failures at achieving this goal and pose other moral problems. However, we should at least be able to agree that such efforts are hollow if programs to reduce abortion must be implemented through organizations that perform and promote abortions."
President Bush has promised to issue a veto if the funding appropriations bill disregards the Mexico City Policy.
To respectfully contact Senator Casey at his Washington, DC office:
383 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: (202) 224-6324
Toll Free: (866) 802-2833
Fax: (202) 228-0604
Or by email click on the following link:
http://casey.senate.gov/contact.cfm
Read the entire National Review Online article:
http://article.nationalreview.com/...
Read Previous LifeSiteNews.com Coverage:
Democrat Dominated US Senate Votes to Resume Funding to International Abortion Agencies
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/sep/07091301.html
Casey Ran as "Pro-Life"; His First Act Seeks "Sexual Orientation" Hate Crime Law
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/nov/06111403.html
No surprise at all.
Many Pennsylvanians will tell tell you that Casey’s dad really was a man, but Junior’s just a little boy.
This is exactly why I don’t support Giulliani,Romney,McCain or Thompson for president. To too many politicians on both sides, being for or against abortion isn’t a deeply held conviction but a political calculation.
This was predictable. He’s not his father, that was obvious from the start.
You get what you vote for, unfortunately.
Casey is the supreme example of an empty suit and is in office simply because of his last name. He's about as sharp as a balloon. Not the sharpest tool in the toolbox as others have stated.
During his debates with Santorum it was obvious that he was nothing but a twit and was clearly the intellectually inferior candidate.
He’s a Rat! Expect nothing else from the party with death as one of their most revered planks.
Do we really expect any different? Casey was an empty suit. There are some Democrats that I see causing problems for the left but Casey wasn’t one of those.
Your forgot Romney who has been on both sides too.
He’s there. All four of the so called leaders. There is a reason they won’t be at the VotersValue debate Monday nite. They aren’t comfortable or credible when discussing those topics.
I will only support someone who is ardently pro-life. Someone that no amount of cajoling or browbeating can get them to change their mind or make them compromise.
As far as Sen. Casey is concerned, if he really was prolife at one time, he just sold his soul and lost crediblity for all time. Never again can he claim to be pro life. It’s a shame, it would have been nice to have one principled democrat.
Did anyone in Pennsylvania expect anything less of this empty suit?
No surprise here. I tried to tell everybody before they voted for him and tossed Santorum that he would be Theresa Heinz second vote in the Senate, bought and paid for just like the first one that Kerry casts. Now PA is stuck with another "Senator for Life" because the brain dead PA voters think that he is his dead father.
And Theresa gets what she paid for!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.