To: SirLinksalot
Also - right to work vs forced unionization...
2 posted on
09/14/2007 7:49:08 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: SirLinksalot
And as long as the Red states let Americans keep more of what they earn, jobs will unevenly flow their way. And lib-voting blue-staters will move there and vote up the taxes until equilibrium is reached.
Equal misery for all.
3 posted on
09/14/2007 7:51:13 AM PDT by
thulldud
(Millete adi politikacilar gibi yalanci vaadlerde bulunmaktan nefret ederiz. -- (Ataturk))
To: SirLinksalot
While the trend cited is indeed positive, blue states in general (such as New Jersey, Connecticut, and California) contribute far more in net Federal revenues than do the red states listed above (such as Wyoming and South Dakota), many of which are net Federal recipients.
4 posted on
09/14/2007 7:54:53 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: SirLinksalot
Yes, but like locusts, liberals destroy their own blue feeding grounds and then move to ripe red feeding grounds and repeat.
To: SirLinksalot
Maryland = Government employees.
Delaware= DuPont.
14 posted on
09/14/2007 8:26:53 AM PDT by
Clemenza
(Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
To: SirLinksalot
Blue States are unwilling to change but directly resist and play stubborn towards adapting and changing.
Their problem is not losing jobs, but rejection by companies to put up stakes and invest for absolute lack of returns on invested capital.
Eploitative unions, politicians, government officials, sit in the wings supported by a partisan media to go right at any newcomer (capitalist) to continue their entrenched routine of "social justice".
These States highlight their skilled labor force, when in fact this force has a preset notion of how companies need to run the place.
Just recall how nortern Governors went on publicized trips to Japan to sway businesses but found these businesses to select and prefer the U.S. south where non-union plants produce efficiently and productively both for employer and labor.
No newcomers equals stagnation at shrinking employment.
15 posted on
09/14/2007 8:27:34 AM PDT by
hermgem
(Will Olmr)
To: SirLinksalot
Many Red State FReepers huss and moan about Blue State transplants moving into their communities and turning them Blue. The question is - Why don’t conservatives remind their new neighhbors of the failed liberal policies that they escaped from and show how the conservatism made the Red States great?
17 posted on
09/14/2007 8:28:53 AM PDT by
Kuksool
(RATS occupy Red States due free passes by conservatives)
To: All
24 posted on
09/14/2007 8:51:59 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: SirLinksalot
Aren’t more red states right-to-work states? I’ve seen announcements about manufacturers moving operations from union areas to non. Wasn’t there just a auto factory that shifted 4,000 jobs from MI to GA?
27 posted on
09/14/2007 8:55:12 AM PDT by
philled
("CNBC?...You might as well be doing ham radio at that point."-- Dennis Miller)
To: SirLinksalot
Very interesting statistics, but I suspect they are a bit misleading. The states with the highest “red-state” job growth seem to be skewed towards major producers in what has been the most robust sectors of the economy in the last five years (energy). Only Florida and Nevada don’t fit that description in the list.
29 posted on
09/14/2007 9:13:29 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
To: SirLinksalot
To be fair, the blue states are pretty established especially in the urban areas. Many Red states are still growing which brings in new jobs and population.
To: SirLinksalot
Just a friendly warning from blue PA. What socialists do is use federal money to beef up hiring in the urban areas. They use affirmative action to bring in uneducated, mostly minority (democrat voters) thus increasing the population in those areas.
Depending on the structure of a state government the socialists usually take over the state houses. Money is soon funneled off of rural areas creating a master serf relationship between the workers and parasites in the cities.
I seen this growing up in Maryland where tribute was taken from the western counties for the trash in Baltimore. PA is largely run by Philly and Pittsburgh now.
You red staters need to think about defeating affirmative action laws and putting your cities on a pay as you go basis so this doesn't happen there.
44 posted on
09/14/2007 2:50:00 PM PDT by
samm1148
(Pennsylvania-They haven't taxed air--yet)
To: SirLinksalot
Thats a no brainer—the blue states are loaded with labor unions which add costs of up to two times for any good or service consumed.
Red states mostly labor union free produce cheaper goods and services,thats why many moving to red states
46 posted on
09/16/2007 8:52:28 AM PDT by
cappy26
To: grellis
48 posted on
09/16/2007 8:59:52 AM PDT by
Springman
(Why is ? coming up, when I use ')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson