Also note the subtle hint that hateful Muslim groups aren't actually responsible for the origins of their hatred.
To: mbarker12474
It’s more or less to be expected that she would deplore the Ku Klux Klan, and they are not necessarily the most noble people to speak out on the issue of illegal immigration.
But it’s disgusting that she mixes all that up with 9/11.
How about separate messages next time? Moments of prayer are inconsistent with partisan bashing.
2 posted on
09/13/2007 11:49:45 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: mbarker12474
Pure pablum for liberals. He starts off about 9/11 and ends up taking a stand against racist Whites. The KKK didn’t attack the twin towers. It would take guts to take a stand against Mohammedan fanatics. Instead he takes a weak stand and serves up his safe feel-good-about-ourselves mush.
4 posted on
09/13/2007 11:53:58 AM PDT by
Monterrosa-24
(...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
To: mbarker12474
Golly, a Methodist female bishop, awash in moral equivalence.
At some point, they really do pass from stereotype, into farce.
6 posted on
09/13/2007 12:23:48 PM PDT by
horse_doc
(Visualize a world where a tactical nuke went off at Max Yasgur's farm in 1969.)
To: mbarker12474
We continue to learn about what fuels the seeds of destruction planted by radical Islamic extremists across the world.Ooh! She gave us a hint in the question! Is the answer "mindless Islamic fanaticism fuelled by oil receipts"? Is it?
To: mbarker12474
The Swiss have an approach to dealing with the muslims:
![](http://www.typo3start.ch/sites/ausschaffungd/typo3temp/GB/e9ef872771.png)
8 posted on
09/13/2007 12:37:46 PM PDT by
Redbob
(WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson