Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Poses Serious Threat to Hillary Clinton in a General Election Match up
USA daily ^ | 9/12/07 | Larry Fester

Posted on 09/12/2007 9:43:11 PM PDT by traviskicks

Analysis: The antiwar Republican congressman from Texas poses a serious threat to Hillary Clinton and potential Democratic rivals in the general election.

The presidential race has to a great extent turned into a two issue campaign, immigration and the war in Iraq. Democratic candidates are capitalizing on popular antiwar sentiments among the public but are swimming up stream by apparently supporting President Bush’s policy of turning a blind eye toward illegal immigration and unsecured borders.

Republicans running for president, unless sentiments change, are generally positioned against public opinion with their support for the war, however, they are riding the tide of public opinion when it comes to securing the borders and stopping illegal immigration and terrorists from entering the country. (Even if half of them are faking it)

Two Presidential candidates, Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul, clearly support protecting U.S. borders from illegal immigration and terrorist attacks. Both candidates have opposed President Bush’s seeming support of the Council On Foreign Relations plans to replace the United States with a North American Union by integrating North America and erasing national boundaries.

Ron Paul sets himself apart from other Republicans by being decidedly antiwar. In a general election this may actually put Paul at a decided advantage over Hillary Clinton and most of her Democratic rivals. Paul will likely steal the thunder from Clinton’s antiwar rhetoric since he voted against the Iraq war that Hillary Clinton voted for.

At least among those voters that believe the Iraq war was a mistake, including Democrats, Paul will demonstrate his foresight was better than Clinton’s.

In a general election on the issue of protecting U.S. borders, Paul would likely ride public opinion with his support for protecting U.S. borders while Clinton would be positioned against public opinion.

Paul is generally considered more credible with his popular positions on the war and immigration than his Democratic rivals.

Paul certainly isn’t the only Republican that would give Clinton a run for her money he is however, the only Republican that would be getting energized support from both Republican and the Democratic base voters.

Of course, winning the Republican primary is still an uphill battle at this point, unless of course Paul can effectively argue that he is the most likely Republican to win a general election, which only GOP primary voters can decide.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: belongsincomedy; hisislamicoverlords; paulestinians; ronpaul; whytheycallitdope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
lol, so this should generate some lively discussion.

One hypothetical question to people strongly opposed to Ron Paul; since Hillary is more so-called 'pro war' and 'pro-troops', (Paul was against the war from the beginning while Hillary was initially for it and Paul has said he would bring the troops home right away and out of the entire ME, while Hillary wants to 'withdraw', but without a timetable, and believes permanent ME bases are necessary), so my question is how many Freepers would vote for Hillary over Paul if it came down to it? In other words, how serious are you folks about this foreign policy issue vs Paul's exemplary, IMO, domestic agenda?
1 posted on 09/12/2007 9:43:12 PM PDT by traviskicks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

The writer’s last name is Fester.. his topic is Ron Paul..

‘nuff said..


2 posted on 09/12/2007 9:44:23 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

ping


3 posted on 09/12/2007 9:44:36 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Heck, I thought this would be about Peter Paul.


4 posted on 09/12/2007 9:45:26 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

thoughts? (from a purely political perspective)


5 posted on 09/12/2007 9:47:06 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Heck, I thought this would be about Peter Paul.

Now you have done it. I am craving an Almond Joy.

6 posted on 09/12/2007 9:47:29 PM PDT by w1andsodidwe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

LOL!


7 posted on 09/12/2007 9:47:34 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Just what Hillary doesn’t need, a new new threat. lolol


8 posted on 09/12/2007 9:50:42 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Dangit... Why is it that the Friday Silliness Thread is starting so early in the week?

Am I in the top ten at least?


9 posted on 09/12/2007 9:50:43 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
Paul Poses Serious Threat to Hillary Clinton in a General Election Match up

So, in kooksville fantasy land.

10 posted on 09/12/2007 9:51:34 PM PDT by xjcsa (Hillary Clinton is nothing more than Karl Marx with huge calves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Haha ...


11 posted on 09/12/2007 9:51:41 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Buy a Mac ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Was Fester the one with the arrow clean through his neck?


12 posted on 09/12/2007 9:51:50 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: End Times Crusader

ping (blacklist opportunity) :)


13 posted on 09/12/2007 9:51:51 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

I would vote for Charles Manson before Paul or Hitlery.... whoops spelling..... Kankles.

Either way, Manson is more sane than Paul and more trustworthy than the queen, “Her Fat Ankles”


14 posted on 09/12/2007 9:53:00 PM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (In regards to Ron Paul, Please see http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1889318/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
NOW I see why Paul is so low in every single poll--it's intentional, he's telling people NOT to support him now so he can surprise Hillary in the general election. Fiendishly clever!

Maybe he and HRC should be on the same ticket. She certainly agrees with him on the war more than most Republicans do.

15 posted on 09/12/2007 9:53:34 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

“Paul Poses Serious Threat to Hillary Clinton in a General Election Match up”

Aliens pose serious threats to US.

Just a likely also.


16 posted on 09/12/2007 9:53:39 PM PDT by crazyshrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

koolaid ping :)


17 posted on 09/12/2007 9:54:30 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

Aliens as in those from outer space that is........


18 posted on 09/12/2007 9:54:45 PM PDT by crazyshrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
The antiwar Republican congressman from Texas poses a serious threat to Hillary Clinton and potential Democratic rivals in the general election

LOL, yeah, all the moonbats would vote for him instead. It's a pity primary ballots are partisan. I would love it if the rats could vote for Paul in the primary.

19 posted on 09/12/2007 9:55:05 PM PDT by chaos_5 (The Democrats are Communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

After reading many opinions here I suspect the majority of posters at FR would support Hillary over Paul.


20 posted on 09/12/2007 9:55:47 PM PDT by MirrorMirrorOnTheWall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson