Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forming the Consciences of Catholic Voters
Vanity | 9/12/2007 | pgyanke

Posted on 09/12/2007 1:33:38 PM PDT by pgyanke

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I know this is a long read but there is a lot of damning information on the Democratic Party platform here. There is no reason that any Christian opposed to abortion, homosexual marriage, embryonic stem cell research or euthanasia should vote for a Democrat.

Hopefully, this letter will provide you with some ammunition when dealing with the clueless.

1 posted on 09/12/2007 1:33:47 PM PDT by pgyanke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Tax-chick; american colleen; NYer; Aquinasfan

For your ping lists...


2 posted on 09/12/2007 1:38:34 PM PDT by pgyanke (Duncan Hunter 08--You want to elect a conservative? Then support a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

unfortunately, the Catholic Church has decided that increasing the number of illegals from the southern border is more important than the sanctity of life. They are looking to increase the number of catholics in the US despite ignoring the ones who are already here.


3 posted on 09/12/2007 1:47:53 PM PDT by bpjam (Harry Reid doesn't represent me. I'm an American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bpjam
I have another letter I've been working on for a while on that issue as well.

Our Bishops are men. I defer to them heavily on Church and theological matters. When things get political, they can get confused as well as the rest of us. It's incumbent on us who are devout and politically-savvy to help them sort it out... that's what I'm trying to do...

4 posted on 09/12/2007 1:51:47 PM PDT by pgyanke (Duncan Hunter 08--You want to elect a conservative? Then support a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

As you say, it’s a bit long, which may work against it. But word for word it is excellently done. If I took out my red pencil I don’t think I could find any use for it.

What you say is absolutely true and vital.

If the Church stood up to its true self, it would certainly revitalize itself and draw more people in. Any people who were driven out by this would be people who were already Catholics in Name Only. The Pelosis and Kerrys in the Church need to be confronted for their own good and their possible salvation, and not to do that for them, or for their less famous followers, is to neglect one of the basic roles of a bishop or a pastor. Salvation of souls requires speaking the truth fearlessly.

I also believe that if the Church did this, fearlessly and with unity, the IRS would and the politicians would be forced to back down. Since when is it impermissible to speak the truth? And the truth is that the Democrat Party is, as you say, the only major party that supports abortion, cloning, fetal stem cell research, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and the legalization of sexual perversion as a form of marriage. The Church has a perfect right to point this out, since the souls of its members who vote for these politicians are being put at risk, as they continually act in complicity and enable those who commit these grave evils.


5 posted on 09/12/2007 1:57:59 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Wow - a very excellent and well-presented letter.


6 posted on 09/12/2007 2:02:00 PM PDT by RabidBartender (Al-Qaeda doesn't need an intelligence network. They have the U.S. media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

“truly it is the one organization that can single-handedly save this country from its folly and do so by simply standing up for its values.”

As far as the “values” you list as your concerns, the Catholic Church surely shares and supports them and is “standing up for” them,

but

(1) it (the Catholic Church) is not alone with regard to supporting those values, not even among churches,

(2) it is not “single-handedly” standing up for them,

(3) it cannot “single-handedly” successfully advance their support, particularly when, in truth, politicians who self-identify as “Catholic” are most often NOT among those who WILL defend those values (the Catholic church’s teaching on them falls on deaf ears, more often than in “Conservative Protestant” churches)

and

(4) advancing those values alone, and nothing else, will not “save this nation from its folly”, in general,

and

(5) in many other ways, the Catholic church does not advance many of this nations primary values but actively opposes them, in doctrine and in practice (as in a socialist form of government).

So, I honestly do hope you the best, and every success, in getting the Catholic Church to improve its active and public support for the values you listed, as all moral Christians should, but forgive me for my disbelief that even the success of your effort would mean that the Catholic Church will “single handedly” restore the values of this nation because the limitations of what you seek and its limited venue will never do that and can never do that (single-handedly restore the values of this nation).

Too many of our sacred values, as a nation, are left out of your goals for them to be given the unqualified label of “the sacred values” of the nation, and your venue, the Catholic Church, does not even support all the sacred values of our nation - our freedom from unlimited government to start with.


7 posted on 09/12/2007 2:08:34 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Your assessment of the Church is incorrect. The Catechism repudiates socialism unreservedly. Yes, it does also criticize capitalism... but only in its excesses. As far as your other comments...

1. I never said the Church was alone in its values.

2. You're right, it isn't single-handedly standing up for its own values right now... I didn't say it was. That's the purpose of the letter.

3. Actually, if you had read the letter, you would have found that the voting population is 25% self-described Catholic. If the Church were to successfully form the consciences of its membership, it could very well single-handedly correct these injustices.

4. We'll have to agree to disagree. These are fundamental problems that without solution will destroy this nation. Everything else is open to debate.

It is clear from your post that you didn't read the letter. Thank you for taking time to post here. If you will take a little more time, I would be interested in your response to the words I have written.

8 posted on 09/12/2007 2:16:03 PM PDT by pgyanke (Duncan Hunter 08--You want to elect a conservative? Then support a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender; Cicero

Thank you for your very kind words. May God bless our efforts.


9 posted on 09/12/2007 2:16:46 PM PDT by pgyanke (Duncan Hunter 08--You want to elect a conservative? Then support a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
The Catholic Church today, under the Council of Bishops, does nothing to admonish the vile leadership of “Catholic” Politicians. It started with the Kennedy family, the most anti-Catholic family of all. The crimes , divorces , and aberrant behavior of this family did not stop Catholic Clergy from fawning over the Kennedy’s until recent years.

We now have a list of non-Catholic Catholics like Kerry, Kennedy, Pelosi, Daschle, and on and on and on. They do a great disservice to the church, opposing the Church on abortion, marriage etc.

The Bishops are Democrats and to them the end justifies the means. The Catholic Church is Socialist and supports Illegal Immigration, ACORN, Union thugs etc. They do little to reform or disown Kennedy and his followers.

May as well be honest. That does not mean the Church is wrong, it is the leadership. They will die some day and may pay a terrible price.

10 posted on 09/12/2007 2:25:28 PM PDT by paguch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
With apologies. Abortion is a 4-year Presidential election cicada. After election it disappears. It doesn’t surface in governor’s races where it would be very important if the matter was returned to States (which the GOP wants). Without life being a top to bottom political issue, it loses meaning. A party that makes Giuliani its leading candidate wants to neutralize this issue. I don’t believe the Church opposed him when he was running for Mayor so we see how that ends up.
11 posted on 09/12/2007 2:41:52 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

That is the point of the letter... the fact that the Church has not been active in teaching the congregations about their political choices. I’m endeavoring to change that. Copies of my letter went to my priest, the USCCB, friends who are priests around the country (including in the Bay Area) and monasteries.

The road we are on is as you described it... the RINOs neutralize the Sanctity of Life language in our party platform. After all, those who champion the “life issue” split their vote anyway... where are they going to go?

If the Church will engage, we will get the attention of those who seek elected office. From there, we don’t have to shun the Democrats forever... when they reform, we can consider their other policy issues. THAT’s how public engagement works... you want my vote, you stop opposing my values then we’ll talk. As I said, there is no reason the Church should find her values opposed in our government except for Her own self-imposed silence.


12 posted on 09/12/2007 2:49:08 PM PDT by pgyanke (Duncan Hunter 08--You want to elect a conservative? Then support a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

If Catholics were as solidly Republican as white Baptists, then New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts would be among the most Republican states in the nation. If only it were true.


13 posted on 09/12/2007 2:54:26 PM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

No, I read the letter.

But, respectfully, the “catechism” does not “repudiate” socialism (it only repudiates “godless” dictators), in fact the current Pope has directly noted how he feels more common ground with western Europe’s socialists than America, preferring the greater interference of their socialist governments in economic matters that we allow here.

In my close reading of Marx and the totality Catholic social-economic doctrine, the only distinction is that the Catholic Church would prefer, ideally, to see its local priests as the leaders of the cadres, its bishops as the vanguard of the proletariat and its cardinals as the politburo. Forgive the rest of Christianity for not agreeing, having recognized that socialist political parties and/or socialist political thinking dominates wherever local Catholic churches and or Catholic education dominates in the west. That is not an accident.


14 posted on 09/12/2007 3:14:20 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
I understand what you are posting but the Church can’t depend on politicians to do their work. The Church (all of them) must first convince the public that it is wrong, then the politicians will follow. Just like the Church is not going to get any law to prevent shacking up or ‘dating with privileges’. Things must be a moral issue then they won't need to be a political one.
15 posted on 09/12/2007 3:18:03 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
But, respectfully, the “catechism” does not “repudiate” socialism (it only repudiates “godless” dictators),

If you're going to play the role of a keyboard expert on the internet regarding the Catechism, at least put forth the effort to read it, gomer. Unless of course you enjoy looking like a fool.

2425 The Church has rejected the totalitarian and atheistic ideologies associated in modem times with "communism" or "socialism." She has likewise refused to accept, in the practice of "capitalism," individualism and the absolute primacy of the law of the marketplace over human labor.206 Regulating the economy solely by centralized planning perverts the basis of social bonds; regulating it solely by the law of the marketplace fails social justice, for "there are many human needs which cannot be satisfied by the market."207 Reasonable regulation of the marketplace and economic initiatives, in keeping with a just hierarchy of values and a view to the common good, is to be commended.

16 posted on 09/12/2007 6:06:24 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
I understand what you are posting but the Church can’t depend on politicians to do their work. The Church (all of them) must first convince the public that it is wrong, then the politicians will follow.

Just a note... that's what this letter is about. Cheers!

17 posted on 09/14/2007 7:46:01 AM PDT by pgyanke (Duncan Hunter 08--You want to elect a conservative? Then support a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
"Reasonable regulation of the marketplace and economic initiatives, in keeping with a just hierarchy of values and a view to the common good". I.E. Socialism ("just" and "hierarchy" are both political determinants and that political process which seeks to impose them throughout an economy is socialism), unless "the Church" would seek to be He who would define both "just" and the hierarchy" as it once attempted to dictate. The founders rejected that notion. The catechism is a schizophrenic.
18 posted on 09/17/2007 11:33:53 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1897911/posts


19 posted on 09/17/2007 11:34:39 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1897911/posts


20 posted on 09/17/2007 11:38:11 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson