Skip to comments.
Ron Paul 60 Minutes and Bill O'Reilly Appearances Could Slash Odds Further
Gambling911 ^
| 9-10-07
Posted on 09/10/2007 5:39:53 PM PDT by SJackson
Ron Paul 60 Minutes and Bill O'Reilly Appearances Could Slash Odds FurtherAt 8 to 1 odds of becoming the next US President, Republican Ron Paul must be a happy camper. Too bad the mainstream media hasn't quite picked up on his grass roots popularity just yet though.
But good news has come to the Ron Paul camp. Media sources have been abuzz all day long Monday of the 60 Minutes camera crew arriving at Ron Paul's Washington office early in the morning. Whether there will be a story on Dr. Paul or simply a general segment on the Presidential candidates as a whole remains to be seen.
The Free Market News Network claims that "Media has exploded for Ron Paul since his breakthrough debate with Mike Huckabee over the war in Iraq." This debate occurred just a few days ago but garnered Paul plenty of national attention to be sure.
CNN remains in negotiations for a Ron Paul (R-Tex) debate with Mike Huckabee and negotiations over the candidate's appearance on O'Reilly tonight appear to have been worked out, as Ron Paul's own website announced this morning. O'Reilly's site carries the following: "Showdown Over Iraq: Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul goes head-to-head with Bill." Stay tuned.
Bill O'Reilly's television program is the most popular network news show.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: heeeeeeeeeykoolaid; hisislamicoverlords; moneymakingbet; morethorazineplease; oreilly; paulestinians; retardsforpaul; ronaldapplewhite; ronpaul; shrimpfest2007; whytheycallitdope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
1
posted on
09/10/2007 5:39:56 PM PDT
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
ROTFLMAO.... Run Paul, Rue Paul... whatever you want to call him and his Paulistinian belt bombers.
He is a midget in stature and intellect and his people are short bus people. Funny stuff.
2
posted on
09/10/2007 5:42:33 PM PDT
by
LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
(In regards to Ron Paul, Please see http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1889318/posts)
To: SJackson
At 8 to 1 odds of becoming the next US President How do you get 8:1 when polls show him, at best pulling 10%.
3
posted on
09/10/2007 5:43:44 PM PDT
by
chaos_5
(The Democrats are Communists)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
And they’re betting on the guy.
4
posted on
09/10/2007 5:43:47 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: SJackson
I turned O’Reilly off the minute he mentioned Ron Paul.
5
posted on
09/10/2007 5:43:53 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: SJackson
RP sounded like a whining little girl on O’Reilly. He is toast. I would not waste a vote on this Wally Cox look-alike.
6
posted on
09/10/2007 5:43:58 PM PDT
by
shankbear
(Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
To: SJackson
I’m not sure who screwed themselves worse on a TV show recently, Ron Paul or Brittany Spears.
Paul’s blathering on O’Reilly that Iran was acting logically, reasonably and he didn't fear them was downright certifiable in the extreme. So much for improving his odds...
To: SJackson
Bill O'Reilly Appearances Could Slash Odds Further Obviously they haven't seen the interview.
8
posted on
09/10/2007 5:44:36 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
To: SJackson
Iran is the foremost agent of terror in the world today and GOOFBALL thinks they are harmless and just misunderstood.
To: SJackson
O’Rilly and 60 Minutes both are jokes. Perfect place for Ron Paul to appear.
What next, a Michael savage endorsement to accompany his David Duke support?
10
posted on
09/10/2007 5:47:58 PM PDT
by
DakotaRed
(Liberals don't rattle sabers, they wave white flags)
To: SJackson
Ron Paul said on BOR tonight - "They (referring to Iran) are acting Logically and Defensively".
If he feels this way does he agree with them when Imanutjob has threatened to wipe Israel off the map on several occasions?
11
posted on
09/10/2007 5:48:06 PM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: SJackson
12
posted on
09/10/2007 5:48:09 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Cleveland Indians: Pennant -14)
To: chaos_5
13
posted on
09/10/2007 5:48:34 PM PDT
by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: chaos_5
If his poll numbers were a stock, I’d short it. He will get zero delegates to the RNC convention and has zero chance of getting nominated.
14
posted on
09/10/2007 5:50:09 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
To: SJackson
In your gut, you know he’s nuts.
15
posted on
09/10/2007 5:50:48 PM PDT
by
fzx12345
(ACLU DELENDA EST)
To: jrooney
Ron Paul said on BOR tonight - "They (referring to Iran) are acting Logically and Defensively".I heard that. Iran is acting logically, from their perspective, though aggressively rather than defensively. And it’s clear to them that American passivity is bipartisan. One election cycle to wait out.
16
posted on
09/10/2007 5:51:32 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: SJackson
The left would love nothing more than to see Ron Paul win the Republican nomination. It would be a slaughter in Nov/08.
17
posted on
09/10/2007 5:51:59 PM PDT
by
GnL
To: ontap
Did I forget a period...
1.0% LOL
18
posted on
09/10/2007 5:52:42 PM PDT
by
chaos_5
(The Democrats are Communists)
To: jrooney
If he feels this way does he agree with them when Imanutjob has threatened to wipe Israel off the map on several occasions? In the past he's noted that a nuclear Iran would not be a threat to Israel any more than the US since Israel, like the US, has a nuclear deterrent. That makes sense if one assumes there's no ideological aspect to terrorist I suppose. After all, we're all the same.
19
posted on
09/10/2007 5:53:21 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: SJackson; Petronski; Allegra
Like . . . . wow, they’ve scored some righteous acid.
20
posted on
09/10/2007 5:53:27 PM PDT
by
dighton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
