Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sharpton wants probe of La. prosecuter
Yahoo News ^ | Sept. 10, 2007 | Mary Foster

Posted on 09/10/2007 6:01:28 AM PDT by period end of story

JENA, La. - Two civil rights leaders urged Jena residents to demand equal justice, and one called for an investigation of the district attorney who is prosecuting six black teenagers charged with serious crimes in the beating of a white classmate.

The Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton both said Sunday they would join thousands of people expected in Jena on Sept. 20 to protest the teens' treatment. That is the day that one of the six, Mychal Bell, is to be sentenced on an aggravated second-degree battery conviction. Bell faces up to 15 years in prison.

"After that, if we need to, we'll go to Baton Rouge and see the governor and the Legislature," Sharpton said Sunday by phone from New York.

The "Jena Six" case drew protests after five of the six teens were originally charged with attempted second-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder, carrying sentences of up to 80 years in prison. The sixth was charged in juvenile court.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: hatecrimes; jackson; jena; justicebrothers; louisiana; racehustlers; sharpton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: L98Fiero

I can see a similar response if some trouble-maker decided he was going to intrude on that click just to get a rise out of them.


The white kid who was beaten is reported to have been loudly bragging at school about one of the black kids being beaten up. It was shortly thereafter that he was attacked. Was he just asking for it too?

As to the town’s discrimination, an incident previous to this attack does bring up the question. During an altercation, one white kid went to his truck and pulled out a shotgun. It was wrestled away from him and the black kid was charged with theft of a firearm, second degree robbery and disturbing the peace. The white kid, who pulled the gun, was not charged at all.


21 posted on 09/10/2007 6:57:12 AM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kenth
During an altercation, one white kid went to his truck and pulled out a shotgun. It was wrestled away from him and the black kid was charged with theft of a firearm, second degree robbery and disturbing the peace. The white kid, who pulled the gun, was not charged at all.

I'm not condoning what the kid did in pulling the gun, but how on earth did he let it get wrestled away from him???

Proves the old maxim - don't pull it unless you intend to use it.

22 posted on 09/10/2007 7:03:02 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Want authentic 1st century Christianity? Visit a local, New Testament Independent Baptist church!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kenth

“Was he just asking for it too?”

Asking for what? I’d appreciate you not attributing things to me I did not say. I’m telling you how all this crap got started. It wasn’t started by some white braggart. It wasn’t started by a kid who pulled his gun at a CONVENIENCE STORE when confronted by enough black kids to take his gun away. It was NOT during the altercation at school.

It was started by trouble-maker who just HAD to stir the pot.

It’s typical you only know enough about this to incriminate whites. That’s all you probably want to know.


23 posted on 09/10/2007 7:26:05 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jackieaxe

I read in the USA Today where the DOJ found that black students had indeed sat under the tree. The US Attorney investigating it is Donald Washington and since he is a black man I am sure he thoroughly investigated the incident. So who knows what really was going on. These were kids being kids after all. Teens aren’t known for using the best judgment. I would post links with more local information but they are all Gannet publications.


24 posted on 09/10/2007 7:30:23 AM PDT by CajunConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

oh, anything against whitie is just fine with them.


25 posted on 09/10/2007 7:31:21 AM PDT by television is just wrong (deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END Welfare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

You ask me not to attribute things to you then say it’s typical of me to only know enough to incriminate whites?

As for the white kid asking for trouble, you seem to have said that the black kid was asking for trouble by intruding on the white kids’ space. If that is asking for trouble, then the other kid bragging about the beating would seem to be the same. With the confrontation taking place at the convenience store, what does the location matter? It was still the same group of people, the confrontation just spilled over into a different venue.

The point I made regarding the altercation with the gun was about the perceived difference in justice being meted out by the DA.


26 posted on 09/10/2007 7:34:34 AM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: period end of story
Sharpton: Not sharp, nor civil nor right!

And certainly not a leader!

27 posted on 09/10/2007 8:04:09 AM PDT by FixitGuy (By their fruits shall ye know them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

So here comes the very irreverand Al “Tawana Brawley” Sharpton to bring his own special essense of justice to the case. Right on, brother.


28 posted on 09/10/2007 8:29:45 AM PDT by dooltotheend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FixitGuy

I like that FixitGuy. Very succinct—covered all the bases. Nicely said.


29 posted on 09/10/2007 8:31:30 AM PDT by dooltotheend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

I think the prosecutor leaves himself open to scrunity. If people check to see if some teenage white boys in this area were involved in this type of fight, were they also charged with 2nd degree murder.

Is there consistency in the charges the prosecutor brings against white and black defendents?


30 posted on 09/10/2007 9:51:29 AM PDT by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jackieaxe
Good questions. It goes to show just how demented Sharpton and Jackson are. BTW, did Jackson ever provide the full scholarship to the false accuser, Chrystal Magnum, in the Duke lacrosse case - as he had promised?
31 posted on 09/10/2007 9:54:48 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kenth
The white kid who was beaten is reported to have been loudly bragging at school about one of the black kids being beaten up. It was shortly thereafter that he was attacked. Was he just asking for it too?

As to the town’s discrimination, an incident previous to this attack does bring up the question. During an altercation, one white kid went to his truck and pulled out a shotgun. It was wrestled away from him and the black kid was charged with theft of a firearm, second degree robbery and disturbing the peace. The white kid, who pulled the gun, was not charged at all.

Do you have any links for any of this stuff or are you just making it all up?

32 posted on 09/10/2007 11:56:44 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: period end of story
Saw a strange glob of lifeless goo on the sidewalk.

Figured it had to be a brain sucking alien that landed on Al Sharpton and died of starvation.

33 posted on 09/10/2007 12:01:35 PM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: art_rocks
Is there consistency in the charges the prosecutor brings against white and black defendents?

One can always "ask questions" but one can also make baseless accusations. One can also make baseless accusations while pretending to merely be asking questions.

34 posted on 09/10/2007 12:02:29 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Why would I be making things up? Go look it up for yourself.


35 posted on 09/10/2007 9:58:41 PM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kenth
Why would I be making things up? Go look it up for yourself.

Making it all up then. Just as I suspected.

36 posted on 09/10/2007 10:09:28 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

You were on one of the original threads about this story, and the article at the time, as most did, reported the confrontation wherein the young man who pulled the gun did not get charged. You merely claimed that it was “evil leftist propaganda”.

There’s no point in looking up the articles for you, as you’ll just do as you are now, claiming I’m lying, claim that the articles are lying, etc. Why give you proof when you just claim it’s propaganda?


37 posted on 09/10/2007 10:49:32 PM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kenth
The white kid who was beaten is reported to have been loudly bragging at school about one of the black kids being beaten up.

There is nothing on any FR Jena thread that I've posted to that supports this claim of yours. That's one example of unsupported claims in your above post to which I replied. There are others as well.

38 posted on 09/10/2007 11:09:36 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Nice attempt at covering for yourself. You originally replied to me not about the bragging, but about the young man with the gun who was not charged. My reply to that was concerning that information being in those original articles and threads, which it was.

As to further links of this bit of information, I’ll just refer you to one of your own quotes: “Have you never heard of Google, are you too lazy and/or stupid to use it, or do you simply enjoy acting like a jerk online?”


39 posted on 09/10/2007 11:39:34 PM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kenth
You originally replied to me not about the bragging...

Wrong. Reply #32. It's right there. Just scroll up. You're kinda nutty aren't you?

40 posted on 09/10/2007 11:43:19 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson