Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TENNESSEE: 'Crack tax' struck down by appeals court as unconstitutional
Knoxville News Sentinel ^ | 9/7/7 | Tom Humphrey

Posted on 09/07/2007 10:41:19 AM PDT by SmithL

The state Court of Appeals today declared Tennessee’s tax on illegal drugs unconstitutional.

A three-judge panel of the court unanimously said that tax, enacted by the state Legislature three years ago, is “is arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable and, therefore, invalid under the Tennessee Constitution.”

The ruling came in a lawsuit filed on behalf of Steve Waters, arrested in 2005 on charges of selling about 1,000 grams of cocaine to an undercover officer for $12,000.

A few days later, the state Department of Revenue sent him a bill for $55,316.84 in taxes and penalties under the “unauthorized substances tax.”

The tax requires people possessing illegal drugs to buy tax stamps, offered with an assurance the tax will be kept confidential. If later found in possession of untaxed drugs, a person can be sued for back taxes as well as facing criminal charges.

Today’s decision upheld a ruling by Loudon County Chancellor Frank V. Williams. The Department of Revenue has a right to appeal the Court of Appeals ruling to the state Supreme Court.

(Excerpt) Read more at knoxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: cracktax; govwatch; taxes; wod; wodlist; yourtaxdollarsatwork

1 posted on 09/07/2007 10:41:25 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Did the plumbers union file an amicus brief?


2 posted on 09/07/2007 10:43:38 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The tax requires people possessing illegal drugs to buy tax stamps, offered with an assurance the tax will be kept confidential.

"We will not prosecute you if you give us a cut."

The potential here for officially-sanctioned bribery of public officials by drugdealers is enormous.

This could be one of the dumbest laws I've heard of in a while.

3 posted on 09/07/2007 10:44:03 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Maybe retailers should consider this a precedent and stop collecting local “sin” taxes on tobacco and alcohol?


4 posted on 09/07/2007 10:45:08 AM PDT by lesser_satan (FRED THOMPSON '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Agreed. I would like to see some enterprising reporter or documentarian buy a tax stamp before a hidden camera to see what happens.


5 posted on 09/07/2007 10:47:07 AM PDT by Huntress (Those who surrender liberty for security will have neither. --- Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

When it was passed it was supposed to be based on existing laws in other states; I couln’t name them right now.


6 posted on 09/07/2007 10:49:09 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Couldn’t, sorry.


7 posted on 09/07/2007 10:49:57 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Actually, this was the methodology of 18th amendment prohibition. The federal enforcers were “revenooers” who were agents of the Treasury, not specifically law enforcement. This kind of tax on illegal substances is actually rather commonplace, and can be described as a “tax trap”, a way to create a penalty situation where other lawbreaking is hard to prove. Like they got Al Capone.


8 posted on 09/07/2007 10:54:21 AM PDT by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
The potential here for officially-sanctioned bribery of public officials by drugdealers is enormous.

Illinois has had a marijuana tax on the books for the last 25 years or so. To my knowledge, no one has ever been prosecuted for not affixing one to their weed.

A friend of mine actually bought one. He's a stamp collector.

L

9 posted on 09/07/2007 11:01:34 AM PDT by Lurker ( Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing smallpox to ebola.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MainFrame65
I had no idea that bootleggers were allowed to apply for tax stamps.

I thought the case against Capone was based on tax evasion of undeclared income, not failure to purchase tax stamps on contraband.

10 posted on 09/07/2007 11:06:47 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
A three-judge panel of the court unanimously said that tax, enacted by the state Legislature three years ago, is “is arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable and, therefore, invalid under the Tennessee Constitution.”

Perhaps we can apply the 'arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable' label to other taxes as well.
11 posted on 09/07/2007 11:07:54 AM PDT by posterchild (If you don't look ahead nobody will, there's no time to kill - Clint Black)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I was thinking of something completely different!

12 posted on 09/07/2007 11:08:39 AM PDT by MarineBrat (My wife and I took an AIDS vaccination that the Church offers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Did the plumbers union file an amicus brief?
3-2-1....bwhahahahahahahahahahahaha
13 posted on 09/07/2007 11:09:32 AM PDT by GeneralisimoFranciscoFranco (I love liberals. They taste like chicken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Did the plumbers union file an amicus brief?

I couldn't decide if it was going to be a story about plumbers or tramp stamps! :)

14 posted on 09/07/2007 11:34:31 AM PDT by Free State Four
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
It should have been worded as a "fine or civil penalty" for the offense.

We can pass laws for sanctuary cities for criminals, allow criminals to have free educations, free medical care, welfare, and give college educations to axe murders (in their air conditioned, cable tv, internet accessible cells), but when we try to penalize a criminal, we get "Un-Constitutional" thrown in our faces.

Go figger.....

15 posted on 09/07/2007 12:32:24 PM PDT by traditional1 ( Fred Thompson-The ONLY electable Republican Candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I don’t really know that they were, but the revenooers were quite real. And now that I think about it, I believe you are right about Capone.


16 posted on 09/07/2007 2:10:27 PM PDT by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat

LOL as was I!


17 posted on 09/07/2007 2:11:05 PM PDT by JenBrower (...government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

I’m pretty sure North Carolina was one state. That rings a bell with me.


18 posted on 09/07/2007 3:44:22 PM PDT by cpanter (FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson