Posted on 09/06/2007 2:42:10 PM PDT by Cat loving Texan
09/06/2007 By MARCIA DUNN / Associated Press
An Air Force doctor who headed a controversial astronaut health study told Congress on Thursday that NASA is discouraging open communications by rebutting reports of drunken astronauts on launch day and deriding the claims as urban legends.
The bigger issue, more than drinking, is NASA's apparent disregard of mental health and behavior issues among its astronauts, and the demoralizing reluctance among flight surgeons and astronauts to report improper conduct, said Col. Richard Bachmann Jr.
Last week, NASA released the results of its own internal investigation, saying it had found no evidence or even hints of astronaut intoxication before launch, contrary to what the Bachmann committee had reported a month earlier.
While defending his report, Bachmann said he understands NASA's outrage over his medical panel's citing of at least two instances of launch-day intoxication. Even though fellow astronauts or flight surgeons notified their bosses about the crew members' drunken state, they were ignored, Bachmann's committee was told confidentially.
"Public statements that such things are simply impossible, challenging the veracity of the findings, referring to them as unproven allegations or urban legends, rather than acknowledging how difficult raising such concerns can be, do not encourage openness and safety, make future reporting even less likely, and increase the risk of future mishaps or incidents," Bachmann told the House Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics in Washington.
NASA's inability to find even a single case of astronaut drunkenness on launch day doesn't prove it didn't happen, said Bachmann, commander of the Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine. Rather, it shows only that the NASA employees who told his panel about the incidents did not bring them up during NASA's internal review, he said.
"We believe this may represent continued fear and barriers to communication and may be a cause for greater, not less concern," he said.
Both the Challenger and Columbia disasters were blamed, in part, on miscommunication and broken safety cultures within the space agency.
The independent but NASA-appointed health review committee heard from astronauts and flight surgeons earlier this year who were "eyewitnesses to the events" and freely volunteered the information regarding astronaut intoxication, Bachmann said. No names or dates were included in the panel's final report in late July.
The astronaut health review committee — established following the February arrest of astronaut Lisa Nowak in a scandalous love triangle — identified a number of cultural issues within NASA that "make it even more difficult to predict an episode of disordered conduct," Bachmann testified.
As part of its investigation into the committee's findings on astronaut drinking, NASA reviewed 20 years of shuttle flight records and spoke with astronauts, flight surgeons and others associated with spaceflight in both the United States and Russia. Nothing incriminating was found, officials said last week and again Thursday.
NASA's boss, Michael Griffin, went so far last week as to call the claims of prelaunch astronaut drunkenness an urban legend, likening it to alarming but false reports of deliberately poisoned Halloween candy.
On Thursday, Griffin said he recognizes that the Nowak case, a murder-suicide at Johnson Space Center in Houston last spring and the allegations of alcohol abuse by astronauts has shaken public confidence in NASA. The space agency is implementing many of the health panel's recommendations to improve medical and behavioral health care for astronauts, he said, and is taking steps to ensure that astronauts forgo alcohol in the 12 hours before launch.
NASA also plans to conduct an anonymous survey this month of its astronaut and flight surgeons in an attempt to ferret out any additional information on the drinking issue or other problems.
___
On the Net:
NASA: http://www.nasa.gov/
With astronauts riding in diapers across country to assault romantic rivals, ya think???
The guy must be a lib because only a leftist thinks any disagreement with his position is discouraging to open communication. All communication to leftists must be in full agreement with whatever they say.
“Both the Challenger and Columbia disasters were blamed, in part, on miscommunication and broken safety cultures within the space agency.”
What the hey does “broken safety cultures” mean?
Thank you.
“With astronauts riding in diapers across country to assault romantic rivals, ya think???”
Singular, one astronaut.
Shall we judge the US Marines by Oswald?
And it turns out she didn’t wear the diapers. It was a complete fabrication cooked up by the MSM and late night talk shows.
This is gubmint officialeze for we put in a whole bunch of managers who understand nothing except bureaucratic process, and then when something bad happens it must be because you need even more bureaucratic process.
Consequently the organization spirals down the drain growing and expanding in so-called subject matter experts, which is a fancy name for a self-appointed pundit on some particular safety problem you didn't even know you had until some other SME told you you need to hire some more SME's. Pretty soon you can get absolutely nothing done at all.
Think about it,
How many people do astronauts deal with before launch?
It is hardcore pre-flight preparation. Not to mention walking before national TV cameras!
I think this thing is blown totally out of proportion becaust it is very titillating, but lacks any substance whatsever. Perfect MSM material.
I am laughing so hard I can barely type because you hit the nail on the head.
Brilliant analysis.
I know you are telling the total truth because I worked for DOD for a while. One minute was too long. Not one of my more pleasant experiences. After I left, I spent 2 years erasing that time out of my mind. I have pretty much succeeded. That’s how bad it was.
Yeck!!!
Thank you!!!
I think pilots lie to doctors every day. And the NASA culture treated astronauts as their cash-cow celebrities and protected them.
They got away with plenty. I find the story credible.
I think some people believe what they want because it suits their strong biases, regardless of total lack of evidences.
I find THAT credible.
Yeah, pilots don’t lie to doctors to protect their hobbies...and astronauts would never lie to their flight surgeons to protect their shot at a mission...and MC fanboys would never protect their Hero from dissappointment...
Why should NASA encourage openness? It does not relate to safety, future risk, but makes reporting less likely which might not be such a bad thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.