To: steve-b
OK, boys and girls, what's wrong with this picture, if one assumes that the intruder's goal was to suppress the manuscript? Let's not always see the same hands....
This is obviously less about a stolen manuscript than it is about intimidation. The person breaking in was trying to send a message that this wasn't just a random burglary.
58 posted on
09/06/2007 9:38:07 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
To: Antoninus; wideawake
“...it is about intimidation.”
Exactly. They aren’t worried about what may or may not be in the manuscript; Clintons just lie their way out and you can believe it or lump it. What they want is to leave no doubt in Ms. Willey’s mind that they can get to her whenever they want to. There’s no place she can hide. I’m afraid I’d be bunking with a 12 gauge.
101 posted on
09/06/2007 3:42:38 PM PDT by
beelzepug
("One should never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson