Posted on 09/06/2007 8:19:15 AM PDT by STARWISE
Kathleen Willey, the woman who says Bill Clinton groped her in the Oval Office, claims she was the target of an unusual house burglary over the weekend that nabbed a manuscript for her upcoming book, which promises explosive revelations that could damage Sen. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
Willey told WND little else was taken from her rural Virginia home as she slept alone upstairs – electronics and jewelry were left behind – and she believes the Clintons were behind it.
The break-in, she said, reminded her of the widely reported incident 10 years ago in which she claimed she was threatened near the same Richmond-area home by a stranger just two days before she was to testify against President Clinton in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.
The theft of the manuscript early Saturday morning was suspicious, she told WND, coming only days after the first mainstream media mention of her upcoming book, which is expected to include accusations of campaign finance violations and new revelations about harassment and threats by the Clintons and their associates.
"Here we go again; it's the same thing that happened before," Willey told WND. "They want you to know they were there. And they got what they wanted. They pretty much managed to terrorize me again. It scared me to death. It's an awful feeling to know you're sound asleep upstairs and someone is downstairs."
The book, "Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton" by World Ahead Publishing, WND Books' partner, is due for release in November. Willey said the stolen manuscript was not the book's final copy.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
“...it is about intimidation.”
Exactly. They aren’t worried about what may or may not be in the manuscript; Clintons just lie their way out and you can believe it or lump it. What they want is to leave no doubt in Ms. Willey’s mind that they can get to her whenever they want to. There’s no place she can hide. I’m afraid I’d be bunking with a 12 gauge.
Others have pointed out that a thief will dump items that they don't want or that would attract attention.
In addition, the thief will want to dump items that are particularly incriminating. Cash is usually okay, because few people can identify by serial numbers the bills that have been stolen. But if a person is found with another's credit card, there can be little to reduce the presumption of criminality. If the credit cards and/or ID or an identifiable wallet or purse are not going to be sold, then they would be dumped at the first opportunity.
The only reason for taking unwanted incriminating items to begin with is to reduce the duration of the crime itself, hoping to reduce the chances of being caught in the act.
Kathleen Willey jumps the shark. I now question her original story.
Uh, given the fact that they didn’t take the laptop that the manuscript had just been printed off of, this is either the dumbest saboteur ever or nothing more than a coincidence.
She should have made a copy and if the Clinton’s did not do this than she could be sued. I think she should have waited until she had some real evidence.
“What if the purpose was not to suppress the book but to find out its contents, instead. If the Clintons know ahead of time what will be revealed they can execute a preemptive denial campaign or be ready with plausible deniability when the book does come out.”
That’s exactly what I was thinking. They need to know what’s in the book before they can move on to Phase II. Whether to deny the allegations or set out to discredit and destroy Kathleen Willey and/or anyone named in the book that would cause a problem for Hillary. The 1990s all over again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.