Posted on 09/05/2007 3:35:10 AM PDT by Puzzleman
On March 28, 2006, the four co-captains of the Duke lacrosse team accused of gang-raping an exotic dancer met with university president Richard Brodhead. One of the captains, David Evans, emotionally protested that the team was innocent and apologized for the misbegotten stripper party. "Brodhead's eyes filled with tears," write Stuart Taylor Jr. and KC Johnson in their new book on the case, "Until Proven Innocent" (420 pages. Thomas Dunne Books. $26.95). Brodhead "said that the captains should think of how difficult it had been for him." The misbehavior of the players, said Duke's president, "had put him in a terrible position." Listening to Brodhead, Robert Ekstrand, a lawyer representing the captains and many of their teammates, "felt his blood starting to boil," write Taylor and Johnson. "Here, he thought, is a comfortable university president wallowing in self-pity in front of four students who are in grave danger of being falsely indicted on charges of gang rape, punishable by decades in prison."
--snip--
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
Good luck with that. Not even a road bump.
these institutions are where all you parents voluntarily send your kids for indoctrination.
Is this a book review or is it a vehicle for Newsweek to try and pretend that they were on the vanguard of vigilence to protect the player’s rights?
I smell a rat here.
What a craven buncha cowards—from the Prexy on down.
I’ll bet they stand as representatives of EVERY SINGLE College and University in the country with hardly ANY exceptions.
Pity the poor Undergraduates.
Wanna spend your tuition $ there, folks?
Didn’t think so.
Duke is a disgrace. There should have been some firings, including the president. Totally disgusting behavior on the part of the Duke faculty.
The media was Nifong's willing accomplish.
“A book that had to be written. Hopefully, it will help stop this terrible march into “politically correct” insanity.”
What are a few innocents ruined as long as the agenda moves forward?
In that case, Stuart Taylor marshaled the facts and applied the law-he went where the logic of both led him, can you imagine a judge in the ninth circuit doing that?-and he concluded that Paula Jones indeed had a persuasive case to make. The mainstream media was exposed then for what it is. Not having read his book about the Duke case, I nevertheless, as an ardent free Republic poster, do not feel the slightest constraint about commenting upon it and I would bet that he has done the same thing to leftist institutions like the media, the criminal law system, and academia with this set of facts.
Stuart Taylor Jr., although not a conservative, serves as an admirable model of what a legal scholar, a legal reporter, or a jurist can be like when he is willing to be intellectually honest.
bump
Brodhead “said that the captains should think of how difficult it had been for him.” The misbehavior of the players, said Duke’s president, “had put him in a terrible position.”
It’s all about me!
The University president & the Duke 88 are still on the payroll. What’s wrong with this picture ?
Exactly. It's gone. Not even a matter of history. The Duke case just didn't happen. CNN is all about the Jena 6 now. Conclusive proof that our society is rotten to the racist core.
If he keeps that up, he'll become a conservative.
I figured out last week why turned conservative; it's because I'm a liberal.
I can’t see either of my sons even applying to Duke. I wonder how many other parents feel the same way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.