Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ben Stein: Gestapo Tactics Got Larry Craig
NewsMax ^ | 4 September 07 | NewsMax

Posted on 09/04/2007 7:48:46 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast

Ben Stein: Gestapo Tactics Got Larry Craig

Tuesday, September 4, 2007 7:39 PM

Former Sen. Larry Craig didn't do anything illegal and was railroaded with "Gestapo tactics," says actor and commentator Ben Stein.

Appearing recently on Your World With Neil Cavuto program, Stein remarked: "I don't like the idea that people are sitting in the next stall from you at a public bathroom listening to whether or not you tap your foot. This is, as I said, Gestapo tactics. Gestapo, Gestapo, Gestapo. It's not America."

Stein says Craig, who was arrested June 11 by Minneapolis police and pled guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct, is a victim of "pure police entrapment and thuggery."

"The police have real work to do at the airport," Stein says. "It's an airport, hello. There are security problems at airports. Al-qaida: Are you listening? Our security people are entrapping perfectly honest U.S. senators in lavatory stalls instead of looking for you terrorists."

Stein charges that police intimidated Craig into pleading guilty to disorderly conduct after he was arrested for tapping his foot in a bathroom stall at the Minneapolis-St. Paul airport.

Police say foot tapping is a common overture used to signal interest in a sexual encounter. Minneapolis police had reportedly made several arrests in recent months for lewd conduct in restrooms at the airport.

"A policeman drags him off, or verbally drags him off, starts browbeating him, essentially threatens he's going to ruin his career if the guy doesn't plead guilty right away," Stein tells Cavuto. "This is Gestapo tactics in Minneapolis-St. Paul. It's not nice."

Stein adds that it was wrong for GOP stalwarts to join the drumbeat for Craig's resignation: "This is some way to treat the people who have been loyal members of your party for many years. What did he do wrong? Suppose he was soliciting for gay sex. Gay sex is not illegal in the United States, the Supreme Court has said that. If it were illegal, it would be a different story. It's not illegal. He didn't do anything illegal, they're just bludgeoning him into a confession."

The Craig scandal points out a fundamental question about the balance of political power, according to Stein.

"On trumped up charges, they bring down the legislator and change the balance of power within the United States generally," he says. "This is a really serious case of police overreaching and the victim here is Larry Craig and the Constitution of the United States."

Craig has represented Idaho in Congress for over a quarter of a century and was up for re-election next year.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Idaho; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: 110th; aclumia; ben; benstein; donutwatch; dover; flyingimam; gaystapo; gaystapotactics; homosexualagenda; larrycraig; laverndermafia; partisanwitchhunt; policestate; stalinisttactics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-309 next last
To: TNCMAXQ
who did not do anything as serious or violent as Vick is alleged to have done

Vick pleaded guilty to one count of "conspiracy to travel in interstate commerce in aid of unlawful activities and to sponsor a dog in an animal fighting venture"was carged with illegal gambling! And pleaded to same!

Facts are Facts!

61 posted on 09/04/2007 8:42:15 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Perhaps you should bring your own porta potty! ;)
susie


62 posted on 09/04/2007 8:42:44 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

I guess I don’t see much of an analogy between McCarthyism and police undercover sting operations targeting solicitation of lewd behavior in a public restroom.


63 posted on 09/04/2007 8:43:04 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

Craig plead guilty, therefore he is guilty.

If I was a United States Senator falsely accused by a policeman of soliciting gay sex in an airport bathroom, I would not rest until my name was cleared - and that cop’s head was mounted on my living room wall.

I can see situations in which poor, weak, or uneducated people might cop a plea in a situation in which they were innocent. But a senator? No way.


64 posted on 09/04/2007 8:43:16 PM PDT by Old_Mil (Rudy = Hillary, Fred = Dole, Romney = Kerry, McCain = Crazy. No Thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

um no, but you are using the facility how it was intended to be used. when you walk into a public restroom, you expect that kind of stuff. not gay sex cruising.


65 posted on 09/04/2007 8:43:38 PM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
In what part of the Universe is foot tapping sex? I’m sorry, I must have missed that biology lesson.

Reminds me of the discussion between Jules and Vincent about whether or not a foot massage is sexual or not in Pulp Fiction.

66 posted on 09/04/2007 8:43:50 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Ben is in favor of raising taxes, too...I think he’s lived in Malibu for too long.


67 posted on 09/04/2007 8:44:03 PM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse

So, then you suppose I am gay?
Hard to take you very seriously. I really thought that sort of name calling was reserved for the Dems.

susie


68 posted on 09/04/2007 8:44:42 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

Perhaps the real outrage is that US Senators can’t behave themselves any better than this.


69 posted on 09/04/2007 8:46:47 PM PDT by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

I have seen no one suggest here that we should tolerate actual sex in public places. I daresay everyone here would say that should be an is illegal. But, to protect our own rights, we probably need a higher bar than was put up in this particular case.
susie


70 posted on 09/04/2007 8:46:57 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
I guess I don’t see much of an analogy between McCarthyism and police undercover sting operations targeting solicitation of lewd behavior in a public restroom.

There isn't any analogy. It's an example of how someone can be guilty as hell, but still the public nevertheless believes the tactics used to expose that guilty-as-hell person are unacceptable.

71 posted on 09/04/2007 8:47:50 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: peteram

I’m fairly certain that the Minneapolis ordinances against solicitation of lewd behavior in a public place cover the sort of sting operation that Sgt. Krasnia was involved with. A restroom is a place where, for example, minors go; it must be possible to prevent predators from preying on minors and others there even if offers of money for sex don’t take place.


72 posted on 09/04/2007 8:48:25 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
Perhaps you should bring your own porta potty! ;) susie,

I'm sure that if I did someone on this thread would accuse me of been limp wristed. LOL

73 posted on 09/04/2007 8:48:55 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
...was Larry Criag even read his Miranda Rights?

Yes, he was.

74 posted on 09/04/2007 8:49:09 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

Amen to Ben!


75 posted on 09/04/2007 8:49:13 PM PDT by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

I am no defender of Vick’s behavior, but as I have been saying on other posts the man’s dogs are his property and livestock. I’ve been hearing people for whom I have a high regard call Vick’s actions murder. Animals are killed and slaughtered. Humans are murdered. As for Craig, I sense he sought the quietest route and if that path of least resistance was to quietly plead out, then so be it. These cops could well have targeted a sitting US senator a la the GDR Stasi or KGB. In the sixties some “dropped out”. Today, good people are fleeing the public schools, their home towns, the television, newspapers, etc. In other words, good people are dropping out because they fear. And fear is the result of living with totalitarianism.


76 posted on 09/04/2007 8:49:20 PM PDT by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

You hit on something interesting, Old Mil -

Let’s say for the sake of argument that Craig is gay. And he knew that that particular Men’s room was the place where he could go and possibly meet someone who is, shall we say - like-minded. Now, is it solicitation if two “like-minded” men meet up to exchange numbers and plan to exhibit their “like-mindedness” to each other in a more private place at a later time? Or is that just a conversation? Or is it really solicitation if one were to profit financially from it?

As Mr. Stein pointed out, it is not illegal to be gay in the U.S. (repugnant maybe, but not illegal). So then, where is the crime?


77 posted on 09/04/2007 8:49:29 PM PDT by peteram (Liberals are just Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: peteram

-—Nothing in the law books that says two people cannot get together no matter what form of communication they use. -—

So you won’t mind if someone comes up to you in the head and says he wants a blow job? How about 3 or 4 or 5? No law against verbal or non-verbal communication; I believe that’s what you said. And if it’s OK in the head, I guess it’s OK in a restaurant or bus or plane or any other damned place the perv feels the urge.


78 posted on 09/04/2007 8:50:15 PM PDT by claudiustg (You know it. I know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

There was no minor involved.
susie


79 posted on 09/04/2007 8:50:17 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Oh, undoubtedly!
susie


80 posted on 09/04/2007 8:50:47 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-309 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson