Posted on 09/03/2007 4:38:11 PM PDT by bocopar
According to a source, on September 7, 2007 a 3-judge panel of the California Appellate Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Paul v Clinton, a historic civil case involving a former president, Bill Clinton, and sitting senator, Hillary Clinton, accused of committing business fraud and collapsing a public company, Stan Lee Media (SLM). Yes that Stan Lee, the creator of Spiderman.
Clinton counsel David Kendall of the powerful Washington DC law firm, Williams and Connolly, will endeavor to convince the three justices that his client, Hillary Clinton, is not a felon and should remain protected by Californias anti-SLAPP law, and should not join her husband and others as defendants.
The California Supreme Court has already said Bill Clinton stays in the case. This appellate hearing will determine whether Hillary is brought in to join him as a defendant.
If she is not brought into the case as a defendant, the trial judge made it clear to her counsel, David Kendall, that Hillary will be under oath testifying.
(Excerpt) Read more at blackandright.mensnewsdaily.com ...
BTTT
“Problem is we get NO help from the administration Bush/Rove left all the Clintonites in at DOJ for years
Makes you want to scream”
Been screaming for years too. Both sides of the aisle are deaf.
Actually...on the face of it, that's surprising. What is the make-up of the CA Supreme's, Doug?
WWSMD? What would Spider Man do?
Hey I hope they get the witch. But her and her hubby are peas in a pod with lots of slitherability...I hope they nail her for perjury...but will wait and see.
I don’t know the makeup of the Cal Supremes. The Clinton decision was a few years ago.
okie dokie....thanks
If any courtroom situation should be televised, this is it. The people of this country have a right to know.
She’s going for the felons’ vote ...
By also posting here Bob is getting the word out.
That's great!
OTOH, it has absolutely nothing to do with my questions.
I wonder who the source is?
It answers the first question.
I already know the answer.
Well, in all fairness, Doug asked people to get this stuff out as much as possible. I think this is a bit different than just a blog promotion.
And who, pray tell is going to convince us that Kendall isn't a fellow felon along with the felons he is defending???
My sentiments exactly. The Clinton’s have lied under oath before, and they will have no problem doing it again.
BUMP
Well, if one looks at the poster’s history with FR, unless it’s related to his website, he has little use for FR.
During the terrifying "clinton Years," this scum-sucking lawyer was also the lawyer for The Nat'l Enquirer.
May of the stories in that publication reflected this connection.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.