Skip to comments.
Chortling Contempt for Ron Paul: Her Giggling "Analysis" of Texas Straw Poll
Townhall ^
| September 2, 2007
| Mary Katharine Ham
Posted on 09/03/2007 6:18:40 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
It seems to be the consensus that although Congressman Duncan Hunter officially won the Texas straw poll, the actual winner was Senator Fred Thompson, who didn't even show up or send a surrogate. Such is the thirst among conservatives for a man that can face and beat Rudy and then Hillary.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Be prepared. The Paulettes will be out in force against you. And they’re not nice about it, either.
2
posted on
09/03/2007 6:25:24 AM PDT
by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Recognizing that the only people allowed to vote were those who’d been delegates or alternates to recent Texas Republican State Conventions, I’d say Paul did pretty well.
3
posted on
09/03/2007 6:26:02 AM PDT
by
caltrop
To: 2ndDivisionVet
John McCain 8. And still he doesn’t get the message and go away.How’s that immigration amnesty looking now Johnny?
4
posted on
09/03/2007 6:26:55 AM PDT
by
Farmer Dean
(168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Should have added: I read on another thread that one reason Duncan Hunter did so well in Texas may have been his firm stance on the border.
5
posted on
09/03/2007 6:27:28 AM PDT
by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The consensus on the Hunter side of the divide is that Hunter won. Because Duncan Hunter did win, by double what Thompson got in the vote.
If Thompson flames out, our next president will be Guilianni, Hillary, or Romney.
Time to throw some support Hunter’s way instead of minimizing his win in Texas.
6
posted on
09/03/2007 6:28:16 AM PDT
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think the Ron Paul people are learning the same lesson as the Howard Dean people did.....internet enthusiasm alone doesn’t translate into primary victories.
7
posted on
09/03/2007 6:28:19 AM PDT
by
Dreagon
To: bcsco
Yep, they'll be after you. Waving that finger and warning that 1929 is just around the corner again. Just like the leftards I know.
8
posted on
09/03/2007 6:28:44 AM PDT
by
Ukiapah Heep
(Shoes for Industry!)
To: caltrop
Recognizing that the only people allowed to vote were those whod been delegates or alternates to recent Texas Republican State Conventions, Id say Paul did pretty well.I think Ms. Ham needs to be more concerned that almost 17% of the party establishment voted for Dr. Paul says something about the growing discontent in the party than anything else.
9
posted on
09/03/2007 6:31:32 AM PDT
by
billbears
(Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Because Duncan Hunter is simply not a serious candidate. It’s that simple. On state wide polls, he shows up with 2-3%, max. Ask TEN Republicans off a given party list (and I don’t mean ten of your friends, but ten registered Republicans) “Who is Duncan Hunter?” and they will say “Who?”
10
posted on
09/03/2007 6:35:35 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: Greg F
Do any of the Hunterites ever read a poll? Your man isn’t going anywhere. I don’t know why, from what I’ve read here on FR he seems like a good man. But he just isn’t getting any traction. The Texas straw poll was the one bright spot in an otherwise unsuccessful campaign (so far). Most republicans don’t even know who he is. The only conservative among the top tier is Fred Thompson. I urge all Duncan Hunter supporters to consider looking at Fred.
11
posted on
09/03/2007 6:36:23 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Our next president: Fred Thompson!! http://www.ImWithFred.com)
To: Greg F
No, it’s time to get real. DH is not a serious candidate, any more than Dennis Kucinich is.
12
posted on
09/03/2007 6:36:28 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: Dreagon
From what I can see, Ron Paul’s the only one who generates any kind of enthusiasm. Those of us who support Ron Paul show up to support him and, when offered the chance, vote for him in straw polls. That stands in sharp contrast to other campaigns.
13
posted on
09/03/2007 6:40:24 AM PDT
by
caltrop
To: LS
Duncan Hunter just won the Texas straw poll.
14
posted on
09/03/2007 6:42:42 AM PDT
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: Greg F
Time to throw some support Hunters way instead of minimizing his win in Texas.
Time for the 'He can't win, only our guy can' responses. Unfortunately the same argument that rudy supporters were using. It's early in the race. Hunter is the best candidate I see in that field.
15
posted on
09/03/2007 6:44:20 AM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I dont know why, from what Ive read here on FR he seems like a good man. But he just isnt getting any traction.
_____________________________
Mainly because of guys like you that are frozen in their tracks by maintstream media annointing of the candidates. You’ll always get the Bushes and the Doles if you wait for the mainstream media to give the nod to the Republican. That’s what you will likely get with Thompson as well . . .
16
posted on
09/03/2007 6:45:26 AM PDT
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: billbears
I think Ms. Ham needs to be more concerned that almost 17% of the party establishment voted for Dr. Paul says something about the growing discontent in the party than anything else. The "What, Me Worry?" Ostrich Brigade doesn't care about that.
17
posted on
09/03/2007 6:45:49 AM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Greg F
McDonald’s has a straw poll. Yeah, that’s really impressive. Tell me when he comes in something other than 4th in a primary . . . ANY primary.
18
posted on
09/03/2007 6:45:53 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
although Congressman Duncan Hunter officially won the Texas straw poll, the actual winner was Senator Fred Thompson,
Duncan Hunter: 534
Fred Thompson: 266
"the actual winner was Fred Thompson..."
Gotta admit, that is some very new math you are using.
Can you elucidate on just how Fred Thompson won?
BTW, I am a FRedHead with strong leanings to Hunter.
Thanks, TLI.
19
posted on
09/03/2007 6:47:22 AM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: kinoxi
They aren’t “responses.” They are true. People here don’t want to face that, but there are really two choices, Rudy and Fred, with Romney coming in a (so far) distant third. However, Romney WILL win Iowa, and will likely win NH, and Rudy will win FL. So you can start figuring out which primaries DH will win.
20
posted on
09/03/2007 6:47:23 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson