Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nearly 80,000 Ammunition Rounds Seized From Home
The Indy Channel ^ | 08/31/07

Posted on 08/31/2007 9:16:22 AM PDT by Abathar

SOUTH BEND, Ind. -- Authorities said they removed nearly 80,000 rounds of ammunition from the home of a South Bend man who warned that the world was going to end.

South Bend police and federal agents blocked off streets around Kevin Rieder's home for six hours Wednesday while they removed the ammunition.

Rieder, 38, was arrested Wednesday and charged with illegal possession of ammunition while subject to a restraining order, Assistant U.S. Attorney Donald Schmidt said.

The restraining order had been taken out by an ex-girlfriend, Schmidt said.

Rieder told employees at a gun shop where he bought 18,000 rounds that he believed the world was going to end, officials said.

He was in custody Friday morning, awaiting a Tuesday bail and detention hearing.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: banglist; gungrabbers; policestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-253 next last
To: B4Ranch

an open powder keg is one thing. Ammo already loaded is and has never been an issue with the fire dept.
Even in a fire, loaded ammo may sound like firecrackers going off. But without a directional mechanism the lead is not projectile in nature because the shell explodes sideways.
As for calling my local fire dept for advice, forget it.
They are in most cases loyal to the establishment, protection racket. Advertising anything of a personal nature is opening the door to harassment by overzealous protectors.


181 posted on 09/01/2007 8:49:03 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

Comment #182 Removed by Moderator

To: monkeycard
So, what’s happened to the ammo?

It's probably sitting in a police evidence room. If the standard operating procedure of many LE agencies and liberal courts prevails, the rightful owner will never see it again even if he's found not guilty of any crime.

If your gun is ever seized and impounded by the cops for any reason, when and if you ever see it again, which is not guaranteed, it will most likely be rusted and damaged by rough handling and careless storage in a damp basement evidence room. In some LE agencies the damage may be accidental and unintended, but in many big cities it will be deliberate.

183 posted on 09/01/2007 9:00:15 AM PDT by epow ("Let the redeemed of the LORD say so, whom he hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz

For people already in possession of a firearm when an order is served, they have been granted additional criminal liability immediately. So do they just walk down to the cop shop and turn in their suddenly illegal firearms???

Back door gun confiscation is equally dangerous because the premise for any restraining order of protection is not a conviction by a court for anything but an inferred threat that can be misconstrued and manipulated for the purpose of further intimidation of the RKBA.

Even if the order is lifted, just the possession of a legal firearm during the course of the order has elevated the law abiding citizen to a federal offender forever taking their RKBA. This constitutes government tyranny. If the original charge is null and void, no subsequent charges arising from the original order should have standing.


184 posted on 09/01/2007 9:02:51 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Now we know where all the copper has been going.


185 posted on 09/01/2007 9:03:32 AM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
If the original charge is null and void, no subsequent charges arising from the original order should have standing.

The operative phrase there is "should have". What should be and what actually is are not the same thing in almost all cases where the 2nd Amendment is involved.

186 posted on 09/01/2007 9:07:29 AM PDT by epow ("Let the redeemed of the LORD say so, whom he hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Spent a month in Kalifornia in the early 70’s. Hitchhiked home to escape the sheer madness. The state was hopeless then and even worse now. Not saying there are not some good people there. But they have no control of their destiny.


187 posted on 09/01/2007 9:07:29 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: TChris
So, let me get this straight. An ex-girlfriend can go before a judge, make some accusations and get a restraining order against a guy, and this process immediately strips him of the right to possess ammunition which he legally purchased?

Don't know about ammo, but or guns, yes that is exactly what the Lautenberg amendment provides.

While I didn't know about the ammunition, I just checked, and it is indeed covered by the law (18 USC 922(g)(8) It even affects police officers and military. Military! According to a Ft. Riley web site:

the Lautenberg Amendment makes it a felony for anyone convicted of a misdemeanor crime of “domestic violence” (e.g., assault or attempted assault on a family member) to ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms or ammunition. There is no exception for military personnel engaged in official duties. The Amend­ment also makes it a felony for anyone to sell or issue a firearm or ammunition to a person with such a convic­tion. This includes commanders and NCOs who furnish weapons or ammunition to soldiers knowing, or having reason to believe, they have qualifying convictions.

E. Command Responsibilities. Commanders requesting guidance concerning the Lautenberg Amendment should contact their Trial Counsel or the Administrative Law Division at 239-2717. DOD and Army policy requires the following to implement and enforce the Lautenberg Amendment:

1. Notify soldiers that it is unlawful to possess firearms and ammunition if they have qualifying domestic violence convictions;

2. Check local unit files to determine whether soldiers have qualifying convic­tions and report soldiers known to have such convictions through command channels to HQDA;

3. Detail soldiers having or believed to have qualifying convictions to duties not requiring the bearing of weapons or ammunition;

4. Prohibit soldiers having or believed to have qualifying convictions from deploy­ments for missions requiring possession of firearms or ammunition;

5. Prohibit soldiers having or believed to have qualifying convictions from attending military schools where instruction in weapons or ammunition is part of the curriculum;

6. Prohibit soldiers having or believed to have qualifying convictions from receiving OCONUS assignments;

7. Transfer – where possible – soldiers having or believed to have qualifying convictions from TOE to TDA units and organizations; and

8. Prohibit soldiers having or believed to have qualifying convictions from re-enlisting.

Did I get moved to the USSR as I slept? You must have slept a long time. The amendment was part of the FY 1997 DoD Appropriations Act (ie. "Must Pass" Legislation, which few CongressCritters read) and was effective 30 September 1996.

188 posted on 09/01/2007 9:07:47 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one
And what is the crime? Ah yes he now must be adjudicated mentally defective or not

Violation of 18 USC section 922(g). Even if/when the restraining order is removed, he's now a felon and has lost his RKBA forever. And so would you,even if you'd had a single round of .22 LR in the bottom of your sock drawer, were you at the same time subject to a "domestic violence" restraining order.

The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.

Ayn Rand

189 posted on 09/01/2007 9:12:21 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE

Clearly a violation of his rights. The long arm of the law needs to be cut off at the hand for taking advantage of confiscation by proxy.


190 posted on 09/01/2007 9:12:50 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9
Do components count?

Don't know, but if you've got even one round of loaded ammunition, you too could be hauled off on a federal felony charge, given that you also had such a restraining order against you.

191 posted on 09/01/2007 9:15:41 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
I can’t imagine what’s illegal about having too much ammo and stating the world is going to end.

Nothing, yet, AFAIK, but if you have a restraining order from an ex Significant Other, or a current one for that matter, you've just become federal felon. Even if your possession of that ammunition and/or firearm was as part of your official duties as a police officer or military member.

192 posted on 09/01/2007 9:18:36 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Do you have to forfeit kitchen knives when placed under a restraining order as well?

No, nor even hunting knives, hatchets, machetes or chain saws. Only firearms and ammunition. For now anyway.

193 posted on 09/01/2007 9:23:05 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: epow

If you don’t have the original recipt for the purchase of the firearm, you will rarely get it back.
Even if there is a federal form for the purchase, the locals will not look for the paperwork or release the firearm unless you can prove the gun was still yours and had not been reappropriated.
Shady cops will make the paper trail impossible if they want to and unless you want to spend thousands on a lawyer for a 300 dollar gun, the cops always win.
There is two types of law in America. the law on the books. And the unwritten above the law category that our government is operating at.


194 posted on 09/01/2007 9:23:54 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
I remember a Stephen King novel (`Cell’ I think) where his characters, giddy as school girls, describe an AK as being capable of a hundred or more rounds—per second.

Not bad, only one order of magnitude off. Close enough for some purposes, but not in this case.

195 posted on 09/01/2007 9:27:56 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg
Federal rules and most states laws, your right to possess firearms is suspended on the day you are charged and will not be reinstated until you are acquitted.

Problem is that not all ROs involve charges or even any complaints, ie. built into divorce papers. The Lautenberg law needs to be eliminated.

196 posted on 09/01/2007 9:40:55 AM PDT by looscnnn (DU is VD for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
I never counted mine, but now I have to wonder....

When I was competing in USPSA, at one time I had 24 pounds of powder and about 10,000 primers in my garage.

Mark

197 posted on 09/01/2007 9:44:37 AM PDT by MarkL (Listen, Strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

800-1600 little boxes of east block 5.56 would fit in a nice dresser or armoire

what’s the big deal?


198 posted on 09/01/2007 9:50:24 AM PDT by wardaddy (the future of the West is bleak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

oh....the old ex-girlfriend angle

she’s pissed...he just got a 5 year min-man for legal ammo

restraining orders are so cool..../s


199 posted on 09/01/2007 9:51:37 AM PDT by wardaddy (the future of the West is bleak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
80,000 rounds of ammunition

That's just a fun day at the range with an MG-42 and a few spare barrels.

200 posted on 09/01/2007 10:05:03 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-253 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson