Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TKDietz

For people already in possession of a firearm when an order is served, they have been granted additional criminal liability immediately. So do they just walk down to the cop shop and turn in their suddenly illegal firearms???

Back door gun confiscation is equally dangerous because the premise for any restraining order of protection is not a conviction by a court for anything but an inferred threat that can be misconstrued and manipulated for the purpose of further intimidation of the RKBA.

Even if the order is lifted, just the possession of a legal firearm during the course of the order has elevated the law abiding citizen to a federal offender forever taking their RKBA. This constitutes government tyranny. If the original charge is null and void, no subsequent charges arising from the original order should have standing.


184 posted on 09/01/2007 9:02:51 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: o_zarkman44
If the original charge is null and void, no subsequent charges arising from the original order should have standing.

The operative phrase there is "should have". What should be and what actually is are not the same thing in almost all cases where the 2nd Amendment is involved.

186 posted on 09/01/2007 9:07:29 AM PDT by epow ("Let the redeemed of the LORD say so, whom he hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson