Posted on 08/31/2007 8:22:47 AM PDT by 300magnum
CANBERRA (Reuters) - The U.S. troop surge in Iraq has thrown al Qaeda off balance and led to a reduction in sectarian violence and bombings, the U.S. commander in Iraq was quoted on Friday by an Australian newspaper as saying.
"We say we have achieved progress, and we are obviously going to do everything we can to build on that progress and we believe al Qaeda is off balance at the very least," General David Petraeus told the Australian in an interview after briefing Australia's defense minister, Brendan Nelson, in Baghdad.
Petraeus and U.S. ambassador Ryan Crocker will testify before the U.S. Congress on either September 11 or 12.
Their reports on Iraq's security and political situation could prompt a shift in U.S. President George W. Bush's Iraq policy amid calls from opposition Democrats and some senior Republicans for U.S. troops to start leaving Iraq.
Bush urged coalition allies to make pullout decisions based on security conditions on the ground.
"Failure in Iraq would lead to, in my judgment, turmoil, chaos in the Middle East, and other attacks on the United States and other nations," Bush told Sky News Australia in an interview broadcast on Friday ahead of the next week's 21-member Asia-Pacific leaders summit in Sydney.
"What matters is success and I believe we can be successful."
Bush said two forms of extremism had converged on Iraq, counting Sunni extremists inspired by al Qaeda and Shi'ite extremists fostered by Iran.
"We need all our coalition partners. Whether it be Afghanistan or Iraq, we've got more work to do, the free world has got more work to do."
Petraeus told the Australian that there had been a 75 percent reduction in religious and ethnic killing since last year, while the number of al Qaeda "kills and captures" was on the rise.
Coalition deaths from roadside bombings were also declining since Bush sent an extra 30,000 troops to Iraq, he said, according to the newspaper.
Nelson said he had received a frank assessment of progress during a 90-minute meeting with Petraeus and said "the message is that this is achievable."
The meeting came as the Washington Post reported that Iraq had only met three out of 18 goals set by Washington for political and security progress, according to a draft of another major report being prepared for Congress.
Nelson planned to write to Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki about the paralysis in his administration and warn him that the "patience of open-hearted Australians should not be excessively tested."
Australia, a close U.S. ally, was an original coalition member in Iraq and still has around 1,500 troops in and around the country, although with a election looming and support for the war low, the government is under pressure to withdraw.
A survey by the foreign policy think tank Lowy Institute this week found 57 percent of Australians believed the country should not continue to have troops in Iraq, while 37 percent said Australian troops should remain.
Australia's Labor Party opposition, ahead in opinion polls with elections due by the end of the year, has said it would withdraw about 500 combat troops from Iraq if it wins power.
Typical liberals. They cannot call for a complete pullout due to the consequences and their lack of testicular fortitude, so they call for a partial pullout to create a defeat of the West and then call the whole idea flawed.
Has General Petraeus cleared this with Pelosi and Reid? /sarc
sarc/off
During the last couple of months the number of massive car bombings has seemed to decrease dramtically. I’m certainly glad to see it. As life returns to some normalcy in Iraq, the Iraqi confidence will build and the Iraqis will be even more willing to help out coalition forces.
Excellent...
Isn’t this pretty much what was predicted that he would say?
Congess’s decision is rigged. The outcome is preordained. The demonrats and their Republican fellow-travelers would vote to cut off funding or whatever they can cook up if Iraq became indistinguishable from Sweden tomorrow.
The grandchildren of Americans living today will pay for this, not the cowards in congress.
And BTW, I thought it was rich when they changed the name of the GAO from “Accounting” to “Accountabiliy.” Talk about bayoneting the wounded, as if they ever had to make a tough decision.
It is excellent, and I think your take on it is, overall, correct.
But a decrease in car bombings can mean a lot of things.
For example, it might mean nothing more than that Al Qaeda is saving up for a series of high-profile car bombings in the 5 days leading up to Patraeus's briefing to Congress.
That would fit in with their "scare the MSM and Dem" strategy.
I agree, but then it would be rather transparent. (Not that the MSM would precieve it that way, of course.)
With us putting pressure on Iran (and we should be Saudi Arabia as well), I think we’re headed in the right direction.
Let’s keep our fingers crossed on this one.
Truman withdrew our troops from a young and free, but unstable, South Korea in 1949.
One year later, after the Soviet-backed North Korean troops invaded S. Korea, Truman changed his mind and re-sent troops to re-win S. Korea's freedom.
30,000 Americans died in the next 30 months of Truman's presidency, because he made the blunder of withdrawing US troops in 1949 and because he had cut our defense budget to the bone.
Democrats want to repeat Truman's mistake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.