[SoftballMominVA]

I read both. I disagree with you that showing same sex couples as heads of families is in and of itself pornography. If that were true, then showing male/female couples as heads of families would also be pornography as each picture depicts a couple, and in each picture there is certainly implied that the couples would attempt some form of procreation (or a semblance thereof). If I read the article correctly, I would expect there to be dialog along the lines of "This is my mom and dad; this is my grandmother; this is my dad and dad; this is my aunt and uncle; this is my mom and mom.....they are my family and I love them." These words are not pornography, nor is the depiction of a same sex couple and a child pornography.

I also posted that I disagreed with the video and would not have shown it to my 10 year old and in fact neither of my 2 children were ever shown any video in school concerning Family Life when they were in school from K-10.

Do not take this to mean I support the gay and lesbian lifestyle. I do not. Nor do I support same sex marriages or same sex adoptions. I'm just saying that pictures of 2 women (or two men) and a child is not porn. The relationship is abhorent and far from my beliefs, but it does not rise to the level of pornography.

[metmom]

I agree. That kind of social education is best left to the parents.

Like someone else asked, why not just teach them reading, writing, and ‘rithmetic?

[Tired of Taxes]

You all can watch clips from the video in question (”That’s a Family”) and decide for yourselves how far it goes right here:

http://www.womedia.org/taf_clips.htm

I myself haven’t watched the clips yet. It’ll have to wait ‘til later when my kids aren’t in the room.