Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Has Betrayed The GOP! (Former Staff Member on Ron Paul's change after 9/11)
AFK at Townhall ^ | 04/18/2007 | Cary Wesberry

Posted on 08/31/2007 5:28:19 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007

Is this what my grand party has come to?  Ron Paul is insulting, incompetent, and now I am sure he is an outright nut.  What I am posting here stupefied me after I read it.  I could not believe I was reading about a Republican... in Congress for 20 YEARS NO LESS!  I've posted the statement from Eric Dondero in its entirety; emphasis mine.  I suggest you take the time to read the whole thing.  It is a sad and pathetic story.  Read my previous post on this so-called Republican and after you do that, read this:



________________________________________
My name is Eric Dondero Rittberg.  For 12 years I worked on and off, mostly on, for Ron Paul.  I started on his staff in 1987 during his Libertarian Party Presidential campaign.  I served throughout 87 and 88 as his Personal Travel Aide.  Ron and I campaigned in over 40 states, including Alaska. 
 
In 1992, I organized Ron's Presidential Exploratory Committee.  We operated the effort for about 4 months.  We aborted the effort when Pat Buchanan declared for the GOP primaries.
 
In 1995, Ron agreed to serve as my "boss" as National Chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus. 
 
In 1996, Ron decided to test the waters for a Congressional Campaign.  I moved to Texas and served as his Campaign Coordinator.  Ron won first in the Primary and then in the General with 51%.
 
In 1997, Ron hired me as his Senior Aide and District Representative.  My job title was to represent the Congressman at all functions throughout the District, to speak in his absence, and to handle all District Scheduling.  I was also in charge of Local Governmental relations. 
 
I served in that capacity til February of 2004. 
 
I can honestly say that the Congressman was more than just my boss, he was also my friend.  We had a good understanding, after years of working together, and were very good Travel mates.  Him and I would literally spend hours in the car traveling from one event to another, during campaigning and for District events.  We would debate everything under the sun, in a friendly and fun sort of way.  Our differences were always over abortion - I am Pro-Choice, he is firmly Pro-Life, and over foreign policy - I am Pro-Defense, he has always been more Non-interventionist.  But we always maintained our friendship. 
 
Then September 11, 2001 hit.  My boss, Ron Paul, all of a sudden changed dramatically.  Whereas before he was a reasonable non-interventionist, he was now rabidly so. 
 
I must say that Ron always knew how to play the game before 2001.  He always campaigned as a die-in-the-wool rock-ribbed Conservative Republican.  Coming from the Libertarian Party there was always suspicions about him on this.  So, he went the extra mile within the District to allay such concerns.
 
He also campaigned as a "Bush Republican."  I recall two specific events when Ron publicly backed Bush for President, quite enthusiastically; Once during a big GOP dinner in Wharton, and another time during a Bush for President fundraising in Corpus Christi.  He also had Bush's photo on the wall at our District Office in Freeport. 
 
I should also note that I personally spoke with Karl Rove twice in 1996.  After Ron won the GOP Nomination, mainline Republicans were unsure as to how to treat him.  We reached out to the Bush people.  After my conversations with Rove, he put out the word to key Houston-area, Austin and Victoria Republicans to back Ron Paul.  All of a sudden like a tidal wave all the GOPers came on board our Campaign.   
 
Though privately, Ron leaned non-intervenionist, publicly he was always Pro-Troops, Pro-Veterans, Pro-Defense and quite Patriotic, particularly in his Campaign style. 
 
He made extra sure to attend as many Veteran's events as possible.  And when he couldn't go, he would always send me, as the only Vet on staff to represent him.  He always made it quite clear that I was to emphasize "my views on foreign policy" more so than his non-interventionist views at such events.  And I did. 
 
But after Sept. 11, things changed.  He became morose.  He became bitter, and quite pessimistic. 
 
I had to literally beg him to support the vote authorizing the President to send Troops to Afghanistan.  I actually threatened to resign if he did not vote that way.  And another key District Staffer, practically threatened to resign, as well.  At the last minute Ron voted in favor of the Authorization.  I suspected he only did it, cause he knew if he hadn't he would cause the Republicans in the District to oppose him, and he wouldn't win reelection. 
 
But 9/11 served as a wake up call for me.  I started questioning how it is that I could work for such a man. 
 
Before it was always just a fun-loving disagreement; debating in the car from event to event to pass the time.
 
Now, I saw he was quite serious, and cared even less for how others, even constituents took his views on foreign policy.
 
Ron and I grew apart.  I served as his Travel Aide less and less in 2002/03. 
 
Finally one day in the Summer of 2003, he called on me to accompany him to an event in Victoria.  He was acting quite strange in the car.  He kept prodding me on foreign policy.  I knew he was trying to get me to debate the War in Iraq with him.  But I kept my cool the whole trip.
 
Finally, when we reached Victoria, I made a slight comeback, that I didn't think his particular view on the War was correct.  He jumped out of the car and lunged at me. Poking his finger into my chest, he looked me in the eye and said, "I will have nobody working for me on my staff who supports the War in Iraq, even you."  I'd only seen this look on Ron maybe once or twice in all my 12 years working for him.  He was clearly quite angry with me. 
 
I knew he was trying to provoke me so that he could have justification to fire me.  But I kept my cool. 
 
For 6 months after than we didn't speak. 
 
Finally, Chief of Staff Tom Lizardo suggested that Ron and I not talking to each other was not helpful to the "atmosphere" in the District offices.  I offered to my friend Tom to resign.  We discussed a date, two months out, and a compensation package and I agreed. 
 
I've been asked by others if my former boss is an Anti-Semite.  My answer is an emphatic NO.  I am half Jewish.  I am familiar with Anti-Semites.  Ron is not one of them.
 
But I would say he's very insensitive to issues concerning Israel and for other concerns of Jewish Americans. 
 
Houston Jews were always suspicious of Ron Paul.  But Ron could always point to me as his "Jewish Staffer."  He would even send me to Synagogues in the District and to Jewish events.  But I do remember one time, when a group of Houston Jewish Young Republicans wanted to lobby the Congressman on some issues.  I begged Ron to meet with them.  He was very hesitant.  He finally agreed.  But the meeting turned out to be a disaster.  The Jewish YRs came all the way from Houston, and all Ron did was berate them in our District Office about how the Israel Lobby was too powerful in Washington, and other issues.  He also got defensive when the Jewish YRs expressed concern over Palestinian violence against Israel. 
 
I ran down the hallway after the meeting chasing the group, and apologized profusely to them. 
 
After 9/11 Ron also became much more upfront in his anti-Israel views.  He'd even criticize Israel in public speeches which would make me cringe. 
 
Ron Paul and I agree on about 95% of all domestic issues.  We disagree on a myriad of foreign policy and defense issues.  Still, he was my boss.  He was paying me, so I was obligated to toe the line.
 
This is not why I think less of him today.
 
Rather, what concerns me most was the fact that for many years he played both sides of the aisle.  In the very Conservative South Texas CD, he was always Mr. Red, White, and Blue.  If he couldn't make a Veterans event, he made damn sure that his one Vet on staff could go, even if it was just 8 VFW guys meeting for a couple hours 3 hours drive away. Ron was very careful to portray himself in the District as Pro-Troops, and even Pro-Defense. 
 
But after 9/11 and most especially after the War in Iraq, he played up his non-interventionist side to a national audience.  This while still keeping the facade of Pro-Troops/Pro-Defense in the District.  As late as last year I got a constituent mailing from RP with 4 pages of nothing but Patriotic/Pro-Troops/Pro-Veterans information from the Congressional office.  I suspect the reason why RP has gone south on foreign policy for the national audience is simple: To gain more dollars from a National fundraising base, and to gain more National media attention from Liberal media sources.   
 
In closing let me just say, that I don't believe his views represent the views of Congressional District 14 any more.  The District, which I live in, is quite considerably more Conservative of foreign policy/defense issues than Ron Paul. 
 
I would endorse Chris Peden, or some other Republican candidate other than Ron Paul for this seat.
________________________________________



Eric Dondero is a US Navy Veteran, former Libertarian Party National Committeeman, Founder of the Republican Liberty Caucus and fmr. Senior Aide to US Congressman Ron Paul R-TX.  He is now a national Republican Political Consultant based in Houston, Texas. 

Thanks to Edd Hendee at KSEV in Houston for passing this information along.  Do your country a favor and go donate to Eyes On The Border; something Dr. Ron "Strangelove" Paul surely has not done.

A big "thank you" to the one and only Ace of Spades for linking this up on his fine blog.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008; 911truther; asseenonstormfront; assenonstormfront; cutandrun; electionpresident; elections; isolationists; keywordspammer; mrspaulsshrimp; nationalsecurity; paul; paulbearers; paulestinians; paulhaters; rino; ronpaul; ronpaulcult; rupaul; scampi; truthers; wildshrimp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-147 next last
To: ulm1
RON PAUL: “It will be a little bit better now with the democrats now in charge of oversight “

What, Republicans are all so pure and sparkling that they would never dream of covering up or ignoring malfeasance or incompetence by a member of their own party?

How many Republicans knew for years that Mark Foley was a page-chasing pederast before that situation finally blew up in our party's face?

61 posted on 08/31/2007 8:12:29 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
First of all, I’m shocked that a Ron Paul thread got less than 100 posts.

It ain't over yet. LOL.

there is indeed a way Ron Paul could become the next POTUS

That's quite a list. Toss in a Bloomberg independent campaign too. And for VP, the only person Ron Paul has ever mentioned is "someone like" Walter Williams, a conservative black economist who sometimes fills in for Rush. Williams has been very warm toward Ron Paul

There are a lot of people who like Walter Williams pretty well. I always enjoy listening to him.

Walter E. Williams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
62 posted on 08/31/2007 8:22:34 PM PDT by George W. Bush ("I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
You don't have to tell me about Walter Williams. He is one of my favorite people.

One of his most endearing qualities is being a militant unapologetic cigarette smoker who will not bow down before the PC progressive health nazis. Economics and Smoking By Walter E. Williams

Bloomberg won't run if Rudy is the GOP nominee. The world doesn't need two liberal guys who have or used to have R's next to their name.

Although I would love to see him run and have his bloated ego bitch slapped around for public amusement.

63 posted on 08/31/2007 8:33:49 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
What, Republicans are all so pure and sparkling that they would never dream of covering up or ignoring malfeasance or incompetence by a member of their own party?

The thing that's laughable is, Bush and some of the other Republicans have went out of their way to work with the Democrats. Think Gang of 14, illegal amnesty, No Child Left Behind.

So Paul's statement doesn't mean jack since he's not a regular Republican anyway.

64 posted on 08/31/2007 11:14:49 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
(unless Ron is a truther who believes WE did it to ourselves)

Paul is studiously ambiguous on that point. He says that he has "seen no evidence" that the US deliberately plotted 9/11

Nonsense. When asked outright if he believed the U.S. government was behind the 9/11 attacks, he answered "Absolutely not." You spend enough time on these threads to be aware of that fact, yet you come on here and immediately post this lie. He is not a truther, and he is not ambiguous about it.

and that there is a "real danger" that the US will manufacture terrorist attacks in the future.

More nonsense. He said no such thing.

65 posted on 08/31/2007 11:30:00 PM PDT by JTN (‘We achieve much more in peace than…unconstitutional, undeclared wars’ - Dr. Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Ron Paul is an unpaid spokesman for Osama Bin Laden.


66 posted on 08/31/2007 11:33:52 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (Speaker Pelosi - Three cheers for Amnesty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soccermom

Does Mel Gibson have Ron Paul disease, or the other way around?


67 posted on 08/31/2007 11:38:07 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush; Ultra Sonic 007
From a total whackjob.

Indeed. This guy's been busted lying so many times, it's not even news anymore.

68 posted on 08/31/2007 11:40:45 PM PDT by JTN (‘We achieve much more in peace than…unconstitutional, undeclared wars’ - Dr. Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Ron Paul pauses as he looks down at his wrist band with the initials W.W.B.L.D.

Traitor Ron Paul always ponders "What Would Bin Laden Do?"


69 posted on 08/31/2007 11:42:53 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (Speaker Pelosi - Three cheers for Amnesty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

His english grammar isn’t too hot either: Him and I should be He and I. Pretty sloppy. I know absolutely nothing about Ron Paul, but this seems far fetched to me. I’m uneasy about it.


70 posted on 08/31/2007 11:54:29 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

>>Traitor Ron Paul always ponders “What Would Bin Laden Do?”<<

Oh come on.

I’m not ever gonna vote for Congressman Paul for Commander in Chief because of some of his positions but that’s just over the top. Is that the tone we want to use with Republicans who have bad policies? Equating them with terrorists?


71 posted on 08/31/2007 11:58:07 PM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Ron Paul is an unpaid spokesman for Osama Bin Laden.

Yeah whatever. More projection and bloviating.

72 posted on 09/01/2007 12:01:08 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
I’m not ever gonna vote for Congressman Paul for Commander in Chief because of some of his positions but that’s just over the top.

It's SOP for the Paul bashers to say that Paul is in bed with terrorists.

73 posted on 09/01/2007 12:06:48 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

>>It’s SOP for the Paul bashers to say that Paul is in bed with terrorists.<<

In addition to lowering the tone at Freep, it also overlooks that Paul people have been way ahead of the Republican curve organizing on the Net - why would people who want a Republican to win and who say Paul can’t win try so hard to drive his supporters away? This is not good or smart.

The smart approach would be draw distinctions in policy and still try to make sure Paul supporters feel welcome in the party so they will be supportive in the general.

Besides, Paul raises and is keeping in the public eye some important principles - small government, personal rights, constitutional limits on government power.

I remember the first debate with Guiliani sneering when Paul suggested the government should respect the limits on government power in the constitution. This is good to see him speaking up.


74 posted on 09/01/2007 12:25:04 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
*******In addition to lowering the tone at Freep, it also overlooks that Paul people have been way ahead of the Republican curve organizing on the Net - why would people who want a Republican to win and who say Paul can’t win try so hard to drive his supporters away? This is not good or smart.*******

I quit coming to this site after the beginning of the Iraq War. It was very pro war at that time. At that time most people here did not think you could be patriotic and be against the war. I just stopped back recently to see how Ron Paul was being treated on this site. I really expected a lot more threads like this one. I was pleasantly surprised to see so many Ron Paul supporters here, but then, we are everywhere.

75 posted on 09/01/2007 3:34:10 AM PDT by jmeagan (Our last chance to change the direction of the country--Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Once again, you have it bass ackwards. You guys didn’t “discover” he was a “nutjob” until he tried to discredit Paul -— just like those who suddenly “discovered” Zell Miller was a racist nutjob.


76 posted on 09/01/2007 5:21:09 AM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: soccermom

Wrong. Other Republicans and Libertarians stopped working with him even before Ron Paul fired him. Since then, he’s gotten to be even more of a nut. You can find webpages and forum posts elsewhere exposing him going back years. Not just this year.


77 posted on 09/01/2007 5:24:26 AM PDT by George W. Bush ("I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: txflake

LOL! Not sure. As much as I love (or loved) Mel, he really does appear to be quited suited for the Ron Paul types. I think they share the same disease, but I’m not sure to whom it is attributed.


78 posted on 09/01/2007 5:24:59 AM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: gondramB; jmeagan
In addition to lowering the tone at Freep, it also overlooks that Paul people have been way ahead of the Republican curve organizing on the Net - why would people who want a Republican to win and who say Paul can’t win try so hard to drive his supporters away? This is not good or smart.

I think some of them resent that we have so many well-organized and aggressive supporters, making signs, literature, billboards, ads, etc. Somehow Ron Paul is cheating because his supporters work so hard for him. Apparently, the approved model is to wait for your candidate to sell his soul to some repulsive elements in the party, then wait for them to come to your area so you can turn out and wave little Taiwanese-made plastic flags at him, then run home and post about it.

They're not jealous of Ron Paul but I think they're jealous of his 30,000+ supporters.

The smart approach would be draw distinctions in policy and still try to make sure Paul supporters feel welcome in the party so they will be supportive in the general.

They go out of their way to heap scorn and abuse on Paul supporters. They've made it very clear they don't even want us in the Republican party.
79 posted on 09/01/2007 6:11:25 AM PDT by George W. Bush ("I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

>>They go out of their way to heap scorn and abuse on Paul supporters. They’ve made it very clear they don’t even want us in the Republican party.<<

I think that is not wise. Kerry was a weenie but at least he had the sense to try to keep Dean’s internet machine on board.


80 posted on 09/01/2007 6:24:30 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson