The evidence of evolution (macro evolution) is non-existant. What irks the ID crowd is that one theory has become dogma without supporting evidence.
24 posted on
08/31/2007 8:25:11 AM PDT by
webboy45
To: webboy45
A question:
What specific evidence do you have that supports ID?
25 posted on
08/31/2007 8:31:26 AM PDT by
Boxen
(If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards...Checkmate!)
To: webboy45
What irks the ID crowd is that one theory has become dogma without supporting evidence. So your complaint isn't that a theory without supporting evidence has become dogma. It's that your theory without supporing evidence isn't the one.
27 posted on
08/31/2007 8:36:31 AM PDT by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: webboy45
The evidence of evolution (macro evolution) is non-existant. What irks the ID crowd is that one theory has become dogma without supporting evidence. The evidence is non-existant to creationists because they absolutely refuse to see it--for religious reasons. Evolutionary scientists have no problem seeing the huge amount of evidence that is out there, with more coming each year.
And to paraphrase your second statement: What irks scientists is that dogma wants to become science without supporting evidence.
29 posted on
08/31/2007 8:38:13 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson