Posted on 08/28/2007 9:06:17 PM PDT by ozaukeemom
Please, don’t. I won’t elaborate, because I do not want to offend someone in a public forum. Use henna instead.
I am so impressed with the replies here. Thank you all so much! I would do this for myself only, no one else. More as a celebration for me. And I can take all the time I want. Isn’t that great?
Wasn’t that a black mayor of a large urban city, and not Jesse Jackson?
You made no sense here. You said you weren’t coming back. You did. You lied, or you couldn’t control your obsessive compulsive impulsises. That you attempted to accuse me of such only shows you were focused on the behavior, and were projecting. My quoting you, and turning it back on you, was valid. Perhaps over your head, but valid nonetheless, especially for those that actually know how to read and process.
Hmm.. so they don't look foolish when replying? Why did you read my posts?
I don't drive a posche nor do I want to.
In a prior post, you implied that a Porsche driver is "better" than a tattoo wearing carwash worker. You judged each on very narrow and shallow criteria by implication.
Since you don't want to drive a Porshe, are you now saying that you want to be a tattoo wearing carwash worker?
Careful now, you are fumbling. Perhaps you should resort to Kozak's strategy. He is sticking with the "better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool...." approach.
Absolutely. But, it was used as an exampleof the disparity of those with the loser mentality and those who mad something of themselves. I don't want a porsche because I don't particularly like them; however, I would far rather be in the able to afford one if I wanted it than in the group who had to finance a tattoo. "Tats" are the mark of the trailer park crowd. Something that you seem to think is a good thing.
Since you don't want to drive a Porshe, are you now saying that you want to be a tattoo wearing carwash worker? Careful now, you are fumbling.
You're the one who is "fumbling." Presenting a false dichotomy is the hallmark of those who have nothing on their side. There is not a dischotomous split between people who drive porsches and those who have tattoos. This is really too easy Your so called "logic" is pathetic.
It was YOUR "dichotomy," not mine. I just illustrated how ridiculous it was. Now you are trying to put it on me as if I offered it up seriously, right after you attempted to justify your original use. You can't have it both ways, but you sure are trying. Fumbled and fell.
Most of your posts follow the same pattern of a glorified version of “I know you are but what am I?” Reread them - they’re all that way.
You should say Japanese or something, as Vietnamese have long used the Romanized alphabet.
You know, just to make it true ANd funny :)
One word. Don’t.
Whatever
SUGGESTION: NO.
It’s easier to be sorry that you didn’t do it than to be sorry that you DID do it.
You just keep believing that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.