Hmm.. so they don't look foolish when replying? Why did you read my posts?
I don't drive a posche nor do I want to.
In a prior post, you implied that a Porsche driver is "better" than a tattoo wearing carwash worker. You judged each on very narrow and shallow criteria by implication.
Since you don't want to drive a Porshe, are you now saying that you want to be a tattoo wearing carwash worker?
Careful now, you are fumbling. Perhaps you should resort to Kozak's strategy. He is sticking with the "better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool...." approach.
Absolutely. But, it was used as an exampleof the disparity of those with the loser mentality and those who mad something of themselves. I don't want a porsche because I don't particularly like them; however, I would far rather be in the able to afford one if I wanted it than in the group who had to finance a tattoo. "Tats" are the mark of the trailer park crowd. Something that you seem to think is a good thing.
Since you don't want to drive a Porshe, are you now saying that you want to be a tattoo wearing carwash worker? Careful now, you are fumbling.
You're the one who is "fumbling." Presenting a false dichotomy is the hallmark of those who have nothing on their side. There is not a dischotomous split between people who drive porsches and those who have tattoos. This is really too easy Your so called "logic" is pathetic.