[from occupied ga]

In a prior post, you implied that a Porsche driver is "better" than a tattoo wearing carwash worker. You judged each on very narrow and shallow criteria by implication.

Absolutely. But, it was used as an exampleof the disparity of those with the loser mentality and those who mad something of themselves. I don't want a porsche because I don't particularly like them; however, I would far rather be in the able to afford one if I wanted it than in the group who had to finance a tattoo. "Tats" are the mark of the trailer park crowd. Something that you seem to think is a good thing.

Since you don't want to drive a Porshe, are you now saying that you want to be a tattoo wearing carwash worker? Careful now, you are fumbling.

You're the one who is "fumbling." Presenting a false dichotomy is the hallmark of those who have nothing on their side. There is not a dischotomous split between people who drive porsches and those who have tattoos. This is really too easy Your so called "logic" is pathetic.

[bluefish]

You're the one who is "fumbling." Presenting a false dichotomy is the hallmark of those who have nothing on their side.

It was YOUR "dichotomy," not mine. I just illustrated how ridiculous it was. Now you are trying to put it on me as if I offered it up seriously, right after you attempted to justify your original use. You can't have it both ways, but you sure are trying. Fumbled and fell.