Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fed Ease Means Dollar Strength
NRO Financial ^ | August 24, 2007 | John Tamny & Paul Hoffmeister

Posted on 08/24/2007 3:56:39 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot

Rate increases have rarely constituted “tightening” when it comes to restoring the greenback’s value.

The Federal Reserve’s change in bias last week toward cutting the federal funds rate, along with its half-point cut in the discount rate, offers an opportunity to test the widely held belief that rate cuts weaken the dollar while exacerbating existing inflationary pressures. In truth, the opposite is typically the case, since dollar-demand shifts when the Fed acts.

Last week, the market response to the Fed’s new course was profound: Gold began a new short-term downtrend. The dollar adjusted for gold started a short-term uptrend compared with the euro adjusted for gold. The 30-year Treasury yield began a short-term downtrend. And the Russell 2000 Index — comprising small-cap companies and arguably the most sensitive equity index to monetary policy error — ended its recent short-term downtrend.

Overall, lower gold prices, a stronger dollar against the euro, lower long-term bond yields, and rising equity valuations are indisputable hallmarks of a disinflationary environment — not a resurgence of inflation.

The 2004-06 rate-hike experience, compared with last week’s Fed easing scenario, is only a small episode in the longer-term dollar response to interest rates, dating back to the beginning of the post-Bretton Woods era of the early 1970s. The dollar lost 67 percent versus gold between 1972 and 1975, despite the fact that the Fed hiked rates from 3.5 percent to 13 percent in that period. When the Fed reversed course in 1975, lowering its rate target from 13 to 4.75 percent, gold actually fell 23 percent. When the Fed raised the funds rate all the way to 14 percent in 1980, rather than strengthen, the dollar fell, driving the price of gold from $150 an ounce to an all-time-high of $892.

Just as tax increases don’t always yield commensurate revenue increases due to a downward shift in economic activity, interest-rate hikes frequently fail to enhance dollar demand. In historical terms, rate increases have rarely constituted “tightening” when it comes to restoring the greenback’s value.

A case in point came at the tail end of Alan Greenspan’s tenure as Fed chairman. Greenspan is frequently blamed for keeping the fed funds rate too low for too long, in such a way that the dollar lost value. But the dollar price of an ounce of gold tells an entirely different story. Gold hovered in the high $300s while Greenspan held the fed funds rate at 1 percent between July of 2003 and June of 2004. Gold only began to rise once the Fed began raising rates that June. After 425 basis points of rate increases, gold has risen nearly 70 percent.

The significant rally in gold during the past three years understandably caused many to call for even more significant rate increases in order to quickly defuse budding inflationary pressures. But the systematic freezing of credit during the last month has forced the Fed to ease, causing financial markets to respond to the real prospect of a lower interest-rate environment.

Targeting higher interest rates to combat inflation is very much a Keynesian concept whereby central banks seek to reduce economic activity as well as prices. Contrary to current Fed objectives, the surest way to decrease dollar demand and ultimately cause a net excess of dollar liquidity that would spark new inflationary pressures would be to target the economy for slower growth with higher interest rates.

Looking ahead to September’s Fed meeting, if the FOMC lowers the funds target, media accounts will suggest a looser stance on the part of policymakers, while an increase will be described as a monetary tightening. In truth, a Fed ease will point to dollar strength and a budding disinflation.

— John Tamny is editor of RealClearMarkets, and can be reached at jtamny@realclearmarkets.com. Paul Hoffmeister is chief economist at Bretton Woods Research, and can be reached at phoffmeister@brettonwoodsresearch.com.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 08/24/2007 3:56:40 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; Mase; expat_panama; Rusty0604; Jim 0216; xjcsa; VegasCowboy; Moonman62; Southack; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 08/24/2007 3:57:05 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Cutting spending to fit what we actually have coming in does wonders, as well.

But what fun is that? PRINT MORE MONEY!!
3 posted on 08/24/2007 3:58:39 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Best part of this whole situation so far was watching Bernanke crack the bears in the kneecaps last Friday.


4 posted on 08/24/2007 3:59:58 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Not entirely sure how cutting government spending would solve the sub-prime bubble.


5 posted on 08/24/2007 4:00:57 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

People scoff and think M1 and M2 are outdated but they’ve been off the charts for years. Now that the demand for the dollar is low, that may produce a higher dollar relative to the Euro. However that won’t last long. The dollar is still going down. Down, down, down until the ChiComs agree to a reevaluation!


6 posted on 08/24/2007 4:00:59 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

That would explain how the $US was at 1.34 against the $EU and is now, after the rate cut, 1.36.


7 posted on 08/24/2007 4:01:39 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Targeting higher interest rates to combat inflation is very much a Keynesian concept whereby central banks seek to reduce economic activity as well as prices. Contrary to current Fed objectives, the surest way to decrease dollar demand and ultimately cause a net excess of dollar liquidity that would spark new inflationary pressures would be to target the economy for slower growth with higher interest rates.

Sounds familiar to me.

8 posted on 08/24/2007 4:01:51 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
Ping to the ding-a-ling:
Overall, lower gold prices, a stronger dollar against the euro, lower long-term bond yields, and rising equity valuations are indisputable hallmarks of a disinflationary environment — not a resurgence of inflation.

9 posted on 08/24/2007 4:05:13 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Lets see if I have learned anything

So, low dollar, high dollar, who cares? The US economy is so strong it will pull the dollar up if it goes to far down and down if it goes to far up? Hang on and enjoy the ride.


10 posted on 08/24/2007 4:13:58 PM PDT by winodog ( Coming Attractions: Bubba II Worse Then The First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

And you believe those trends will continue if the fed eases on the funds rate?


11 posted on 08/24/2007 4:16:30 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
The dollar is currently close to 30 year lows compared to a basket of foreign currencies. It has lost 30% against the Euro the last five years.

And lowering rates will make this equation more favorable?

12 posted on 08/24/2007 4:16:32 PM PDT by Tripleplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
I believe that if the Fed lowers rates to be in more of a logical relationship to other rates in the yield curve, that would be neutral or in fact be disinflationary. The problem is when the Fed waits too long to lower rate (as it always does), then it has to lower rates too much, which is inflationary.

The Fed creates inflation at both extremes of the credit cycle. It creates too much money when rates are too low, and it does economic damage when rates are too high. Both results are inflationary.

13 posted on 08/24/2007 4:22:11 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

“When the Fed reversed course in 1975, lowering its rate target from 13 to 4.75 percent, gold actually fell 23 percent. When the Fed raised the funds rate all the way to 14 percent in 1980, rather than strengthen, the dollar fell, driving the price of gold from $150 an ounce to an all-time-high of $892.”

I wonder about causation. Did the value of Gold change in reaction to the Fed’s moves or did the Fed change to stop dollar problems which then showed up in the price of gold?

I’ve been trying to get a handle on the value of gold versus the dollar and its abilty to predict general economic trends. First I think gold and oil are poor commodities to use since they raise and fall on other than just pure economic news. Maybe lead? I don’t know. Anyway I did some quick and dirty analysis and found gold and oil and lead seem to be closely tied.

Just an amateur economist with lots to learn.


14 posted on 08/24/2007 4:23:52 PM PDT by live+let_live
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winodog

The economy is strong because we are selling tons of stuff abroad.

Weak $$$ : strong exports :strong economy : full employment


15 posted on 08/24/2007 4:26:01 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Hillary's color is yellow.....how appropriate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: live+let_live

The economic facts of the 1970’s should shoot down the widely held belief that economic growth and employment growth cause inflation. Instead, the word “stagflation” was invented and everybody maintained business as usual.


16 posted on 08/24/2007 4:26:50 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

HAH!


17 posted on 08/24/2007 4:26:51 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Cut the rate when necessary. If we’re going to keep the big import industry going for a little while, the dollar must fall to equalize with foreign currencies. And eventually, America will have to get back to real work (more manufacturing).


18 posted on 08/24/2007 4:27:40 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Tripleplay
That would explain how the $US was at 1.34 against the $EU and is now, after the rate cut, 1.36.

Where was the $US when the Fed Funds rate was 1%?

Gold hovered in the high $300s while Greenspan held the fed funds rate at 1 percent between July of 2003 and June of 2004.

Hmmmmmmmmmm.

19 posted on 08/24/2007 4:42:55 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
It creates too much money when rates are too low, and it does economic damage when rates are too high. Both results are inflationary.

Don't tell the goldbugs or other financial illiterates.

20 posted on 08/24/2007 4:46:05 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson