Yeah. Ha ha. I just can't believe those barbarians could find a pot to piss in.
Posted on 08/23/2007 10:11:01 PM PDT by Coleus
BACK TO SCHOOL nowadays means back to classrooms, lessons and textbooks permeated by multiculturalism and its championing of "diversity." Many parents and teachers regard multiculturalism as an indispensable educational supplement, a salutary influence that "enriches" the curriculum. But is it? With the world's continents bridged by the Internet and global commerce, multiculturalism claims to offer a real value: a cosmopolitan, rather than provincial, understanding of the world beyond the student's immediate surroundings. But it is a peculiar kind of "broadening." Multiculturalists would rather have students admire the primitive patterns of Navajo blankets, say, than learn why Islam's medieval golden age of scientific progress was replaced by fervent piety and centuries of stagnation. Leaf through a school textbook, and you'll find that there is a definite pattern behind multiculturalism's reshaping of the curriculum. What multiculturalists seek is not the goal they advertise, but something else entirely. Consider, for instance, the teaching of history.
Sin doctoring
One text acclaims the inhabitants of West Africa in pre-Columbian times for having prosperous economies and for establishing a university in Timbuktu. But it ignores their brutal trade in slaves and the proliferation of far more consequential institutions of learning in Paris, Oxford and elsewhere in Europe. Some books routinely lionize the architecture of the Aztecs, but purposely overlook or underplay the fact that they practiced human sacrifice. A few textbooks seek to portray Islam as peaceful, in part by presenting the concept of jihad (sacred war) to mean an internal struggle to surmount temptation and evil, while playing down Islam's actual wars of religious conquest.
What these textbooks reveal is a concerted effort to portray the most backward, impoverished and murderous cultures as advanced, prosperous and life-enhancing. Multiculturalism's goal is not to teach about other cultures, but to promote -- by means of distortions and half-truths -- the notion that non-Western cultures are as good as, if not better than, Western culture. Far from broadening the curriculum, what multiculturalism seeks is to diminish the value of Western culture in the minds of students. But, given all the facts, the objective superiority of Western culture is apparent, so multiculturalists must artificially elevate other cultures and depreciate the West.
If students were to learn the truth of the hardscrabble life of primitive farming in, say, India, they would recognize that subsistence living is far inferior to life on any mechanized farm in Kansas, which demands so little manpower yet yields so much. An informed, rational student would not swallow the "politically correct" conclusions he is fed by multiculturalism. If he were given the actual facts, he could recognize that where men are politically free, as in the West, they can prosper economically; that science and technology are superior to superstition; that man's life is far longer, happier and safer in the West today than in any other culture in history.
The ideals, achievements and history of Western culture in general -- and of America in particular -- are therefore purposely given short shrift by multiculturalism. That the Industrial Revolution and the Information Age were born and flourished in Western nations, that the preponderance of Nobel prizes in science have been awarded to people in the West -- such facts, if they are noted, are passed over with little elaboration. The "history" that students do learn is rewritten to fit multiculturalism's agenda. Consider the birth of the United States. Some texts would have children believe the baseless claim that America's founders modeled the Constitution on a confederation of Indian tribes. This is part of a wider drive to portray the United States as a product of the "convergence" of three traditions -- native Indian, African and European.
But the American republic, with an elected government limited by individual rights, was born not of Stone Age peoples, but primarily of the European Enlightenment. It is a product of the ideas of thinkers such as John Locke, a British philosopher, and his intellectual heirs in colonial America, such as Thomas Jefferson. It is a gross misconception to view multiculturalism as an effort to enrich education. By reshaping the curriculum, the purveyors of diversity in the classroom calculatedly seek to prevent students from grasping the objective value to human life of Western culture -- a culture whose magnificent achievements have brought man from mud huts to moon landings. Multiculturalism is no boon to education, but an agent of anti-Western ideology. Elan Journo is a junior fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine, Calif.
ANother leftist crock of poop to gain control over the population. Orwellian BS.
Bumpski!
Is that multi-cultural enough for the PC crowd?
It is amazing what the West has achieved in the last 500 years as opposed to any other culture on Earth. Multi-culturalism is an attempt by the Left to explain the failings of the Left, ultimately. It’s the “Well yeah, the US did well but considering blah,blah,blah, we would have done just as well (ignore our starvation of the Ukrainians), blah,blah,blah”.
The multi cultural agenda it all about destroying America as well as the West in general.
Bump!
Multi-culturalism is an exercise in Bergeronian equality as described by Kurt Vonnegut.
Anti-freedom, anti-individual, anti-life multicollectivist gangs of "progressives" at work. Peddle that nonsense in Mecca.
It’s always funny when a multiculti or other leftist starts blathering about how “advanced” some non-Western culture was because its inhabitants could throw up the equivalent of Stonehenge as arranged by a drunk half-wit, and it never occurs to them that at the same time, “backwards” Western Civilization had to settle for, say, Chartres Cathedral.
Primitive finger painting art=good. Titian=bad.
Yeah. Ha ha. I just can't believe those barbarians could find a pot to piss in.
bookmark
Get with the program. No culture except western culture has ever done anything worthwhile.
Come on, Stormer. I didn’t say non-Western cultures never built anything (Great Wall, Pyramids, etc.). The point is that we put up with a lot of “everybody-gets-a-trophy”-type cultural/architectural equivalence just to help leftists feel that the third world is not only morally superior to, but at least as advanced as, the West.
“No culture except western culture has ever done anything worthwhile.”
You’re probably right. I mean, after all, just where would be without Paris Hilton, NASCAR, and Wheel of Fortune?
I don’t believe in multiculturalism in the U.S. I believe it’s a single culture, regardless of what others may think. Pizza, at one time, was exotic. Sushi is becoming commonplace.
Which brings up my other gripe with anthropology. Almost all the professors in that field bemoan the loss of primitive cultures to modern methods. To which I say at one point everyone lived in a primitive culture until overtaken by some bigger, usually crueler culture. I don't regret that my ancestors were conquered by the Romans. Me and my ancestors after the initial subjugation are pretty darn glad the Romans came in. So why should it be bad for today's primitive cultures to go modern? The answer: it isn't bad...it's good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.