Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/23/2007 1:24:07 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Plutarch
Looks like the FNC bias for Rudy is paying off in their own poll.
2 posted on 08/23/2007 1:28:39 PM PDT by chaos_5 (Put the illegals aliens on a path ... back to Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

The only number than changed significantly is McCain’s plummet. Everyone else seems to be in a holding pattern until Fred gets up and running.


5 posted on 08/23/2007 1:49:00 PM PDT by inkling (exurbanleague.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

Hunter is surging, up to .00024 % from .00000065 % the week before. Tremendous progress!


6 posted on 08/23/2007 1:52:39 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch
old poll...

Mike

9 posted on 08/23/2007 1:56:05 PM PDT by MichaelP (Lets go Fred...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

Why are so many registered Republicans for Guliani?? Can’t they see he’s a RINO? He doesn’t uphold the tradition GOP values that real candidates stand for. Good to know Fred’s got solid support, but man, why doesn’t anybody like Duncan Hunter?? He’s behind Ron Paul for crying out loud. Something is really screwy amongst the batch they’ve been polling here.


14 posted on 08/23/2007 2:03:48 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (From my fist to Harry Reid's face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

If outfits like Fox weren’t propping up Fruity Rudy, he’d be in the single-digits-—in their own polls.


19 posted on 08/23/2007 2:06:12 PM PDT by Antoninus (The greatest gifts parents can give their children are siblings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch
I’d like to see a poll of likely Rep. primary voters divided into in three categories: Those in states with primaries before Feb. 5, on Feb. 5, and after Feb. 5. To win the nomination, a candidate needs 1259 delegates. In January, 354 will be assigned. By midnight on Feb. 5, 1356 delegates will be assigned, 1004 on that day.

National polls on the primaries are meaningless unless tied to the delegates earned, state by state. If Candidate X wins California by .01%, that trumps Y winning several smaller states by 100%.

22 posted on 08/23/2007 2:24:00 PM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

Interesting. How many voted in this poll for Duncan Hunter? I did, for one. Why didn’t our votes register?


23 posted on 08/23/2007 2:27:27 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

I notice this poll included both Democrats and Republicans. Who else would the Dems say they’d vote for but Rudy?


24 posted on 08/23/2007 2:27:53 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

Fox has not had a decent and accurate poll since Opinion Dynamics started doing their polling. Rasmussen is the most accurate.

LLS


27 posted on 08/23/2007 2:33:02 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

I read all the anti-Rudy comments from Freepers. I believe politics is all about who is rising up to be the cream of the crap. Unadulterated idealism will get you a Hildabeast for a President. When it comes down to a head-to-head between Hillary and Rudi, I beleieve 90% of Freepers will break down and vote for Rudy. Rudy does indeed leave much to be desired as a GOP presidential candidate. Yes, he is very liberal on social issues and I don’t like it. He will, however, be a bulldog in the WOT. I won’t have any trouble sleeping at night knowing he is running the war. He will not be characterized by the “New Tone” in his relationships with the Democrats or the leftist media. They will be the ones on the defensive. He will make lots of us shout “Yeah!” when he reminds Jackasses and journalists who the boss is and what the stakes are.

As for Fred Thompson. I will vote for him in the primary and the general if he can convince me he will defeat Hillary. I’m not convinced at all so far. He was tepid as Minority Council during the Watergate hearings. He had a chance to latch on to Clinton’s butt regarding various secrets sold to the Chicoms for campaign loot. He didn’t get it done. He was with McCain on McCain-Feingold. I guess he is not gung-ho about the 1st Amendment. He was mediocre as a US Senator. Can you name any legislation he authored or was closely associated with? He has a repetitive reputation for laziness. And what’s with all this pussyfooting about getting into the race? Is he not sure he wants to run? Or is he finessing his entrance to get the biggest bang for his buck? Whatever. His image as a folksy conservative actor goes only so far with me. Can he win? For certain I never again want to see a happy pair of Clintons on election night. Too much is at stake.


33 posted on 08/23/2007 2:56:11 PM PDT by Combat_Liberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

Why didn’t you post the (sucky) internals of this (shabby) poll? They were right at the top of the page.


36 posted on 08/23/2007 2:59:34 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

Who did they poll, their own newsroom?


59 posted on 08/23/2007 6:35:25 PM PDT by Grunthor (When life gives you lemons, you throw them at the mean people and hope it gets them in the eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch
"900 registered voters"

Therefore, meaningless.

At minimum, you have to get likely voters. The most accurate is going to be obtained by removing people who did not vote in the last primary.

64 posted on 08/23/2007 6:54:28 PM PDT by B Knotts (Anybody but Giuliani!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch; George W. Bush

Meanwhile: In other news, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson are the top three in the various republican straw polls.

http://ok4ronpaul.ashlux.com/wiki/index.php?title=2008_Presidential_GOP_straw_poll_results


76 posted on 08/23/2007 8:15:23 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch
Fox News/Opinion Dynamics Poll: Giuliani Hillary in drag 29%; Thompson 14%; Romney 11%

There... I fixed it. 

84 posted on 08/23/2007 10:26:46 PM PDT by Redcloak (The 2nd Amendment isn't about sporting goods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

Technically, “don’t know” is running second and climbing.


108 posted on 08/24/2007 6:06:23 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Global warming? Hell, in Texas, we just call that "summer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

Fox News Dynamics poll

PAAAAAHHHHHHLEEEEEEZZZZZZ, that poll is so discredited over the years as to need a laugh track as a matter of law.

(kerry will win by 5)


112 posted on 08/24/2007 6:11:57 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson