Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruling on honour killings (Islam Q & A)
Islam Q&A ^ | 8-22-2007 | Islam Q&A

Posted on 08/22/2007 3:38:38 PM PDT by Salman

...

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) has explained to us the reasons for which it becomes permissible to shed this blood. He said: “It is not permissible to shed the blood of a Muslim who bears witness that there is no god but Allaah and that I am the Messenger of Allaah except in three cases: a life for a life (murder), zina of one of who is previously-married (adultery), and the one who changes his religion and forsakes the jamaa’ah.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (6370) and Muslim (3175). From this it is clear that zina on the part of one who is married is one of the reasons that make it permissible to kill a person, but the zaani (adulterer) cannot be killed unless two conditions are met:

1-

He should be previously-married. The scholars have explained what is meant by previously-married in this case.

...

-2-

The second condition is that it should be proven that the hadd punishment is deserved, by the testimony of four male witnesses who saw the private parts meet, or the person should freely admit to having committed zina, without being forced to do so.

...

Based on this, that which is called “honour killing” is a transgression and wrongdoing, because it is killing one who does not deserve to be killed, namely the virgin if she commits zina (fornication), but the shar’i punishment in her case is flogging and banishment for one year, not execution

...

(Excerpt) Read more at islamqa.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: honorkilling; honorkillings; honourkilling; honourkillings; islam
See? See?

Islam isn't so bad now is it?

1 posted on 08/22/2007 3:38:42 PM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salman

“and the one who changes his religion and forsakes the jamaa’ah.”

So I can still kill one who converts to Christianity?

signed, Abdullah al-goatlover.


2 posted on 08/22/2007 3:42:45 PM PDT by dynachrome (Henry Bowman is right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Q & A = Question and Allah says.


3 posted on 08/22/2007 3:44:25 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman
Islam isn't so bad now is it?

Allah Satan knows best.

4 posted on 08/22/2007 3:48:17 PM PDT by Recovering Hermit (There's another old saying Senator..."Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

How “progressive” of them


5 posted on 08/22/2007 3:52:20 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman
Let's not focus on all this killing, killing stuff. Let's focus on your submission. If you all submit to Allaah, there won't be any killing.

Well OK, there will be some killing, because...well, a lot of killing, since most of you are adulterous, reprobate infidels. But let's not talk about that.

Look! Isn't that Mohammed ascending to heaven on Barack Obama? We are truly blessed! Now, submit. We're not kidding. Don't make us do this.

6 posted on 08/22/2007 5:39:05 PM PDT by Sender (A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson