Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Has Maliki Ended The Insurgency? Earlier today, the Italian news service AKI reported that the presumed leader of the largest insurgency in Iraq will start cooperating with the Iraqi government. Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, one of the highest-ranking members of Saddam Hussein's government, reportedly pledged to work with Iraqi and American forces to fight al-Qaeda in Iraq:

The leader of Iraq's banned Baath party, Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, has decided to join efforts by the Iraqi authorities to fight al-Qaeda, one of the party's former top officials, Abu Wisam al-Jashaami, told pan-Arab daily Al Hayat. "AlDouri has decided to sever ties with al-Qaeda and sign up to the programme of the national resistance, which includes routing Islamist terrorists and opening up dialogue with the Baghdad government and foreign forces," al-Jashaami said.

Al-Douri has decided to deal directly with US forces in Iraq, according to al-Jashaami. He figures in the 55-card deck of "most wanted" officials from the former Iraqi regime issued by the US government.

In return, for cooperating in the fight against al-Qaeda, al-Douri has asked for guarantees over his men's safety and for an end to Iraqi army attacks on his militias.

Recent weeks have seen a first step in this direction, when Baathist fighters cooperated with Iraqi government forces in hunting down al-Qaeda operatives in the volatile Diyala province and in several districts of the capital, Baghadad. This could be game, set, and match for the Iraq War. Some smaller insurgent elements assisted in clearing Baqubah as a test to see whether an alliance with Americans would work. Apparently, the experiment worked. If al-Douri accepts the authority of the elected Iraqi government, then almost all of the resistance in western Iraq will disappear -- leaving AQI very exposed.

It seems more than just coincidental that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki visited the former Ba'athist power base of Tikrit last Thursday. Maliki went to Saddam's hometown, where al-Douri likely has his strongest allies, to meet with the Sunni sheikhs. They gave him a warm welcome, and they pledged to find ways to work with each other. At the same time, he signed an agreement with the Kurds and the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, which has been Moqtada al-Sadr's bitter opponent in the south.

Putting all of this together, it looks like Maliki decided to dump Sadr at the beginning of the surge. Sadr fled to Iran for a while, returned to see whether he could weasel his way back into power, and then pulled his deputies from Maliki's government. When it didn't fall, Maliki went to the SIIC to cut a deal with them instead. Once he did that, he brought the Kurds into it and looked for an opening with the Sunnis of Tikrit.

The turning of al-Douri, if true, would indicate that Maliki may have succeeded in marginalizing Sadr and bringing together the rest of the disparate elements of Iraq at least into a relationship where unity could occur. That would not have happened except for the performance of Petraeus and his work in Anbar and Diyala. The surge came as Sunnis had tired of AQI's brutal imposition of Taliban-like rule, and the renewed American effort has given the tribes a reason to unite and to work with the Baghdad government.

Maliki may have taken a huge step towards ending the insurgency while dispensing with Sadr. If so, Congress may hear in September that significant progress has been made both politically and militarily -- and that we can see the light at the end of the tunnel.

UPDATE: Read Michael Yon's latest dispatch to get an idea why even the insurgents prefer the Americans and Maliki. As NZ Bear mentioned on CQ Radio today, Yon notes that AQI makes the best argument for stamping out AQI.

There is another side to the al-Douri story, though, if he does in fact switch teams. The Iraqis have jailed and tried Saddam-era officials with less direct complicity in atrocities than al-Douri, such as Tariq Aziz. Can the King of Clubs simply go free, and if so, how so? The answer will probably be that a pardon will save many more lives and bring healing to Iraq -- all of which would undoubtedly be true. It will provoke some uncomfortable questions about the scope of forgiveness necessary for an Iraqi national reconciliation.

Posted by Ed Morrissey on August 22, 2007 3:00 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)

1 posted on 08/22/2007 1:59:22 PM PDT by WBL 1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: WBL 1952

Izzy the Red is hearing footsteps.


103 posted on 08/22/2007 3:50:29 PM PDT by sono ("I'm glad I don't play anymore. I could never learn all those handshakes." Phil Rizzuto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952

http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/the-ghosts-of-anbar-part-1-of-4.htm


104 posted on 08/22/2007 3:52:20 PM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952

If this turns out to be true, we know what will happen, don`t we? The media and the libs will be all over Bush for being a hypocrite and cozying up to a mass murderer.


111 posted on 08/22/2007 4:29:02 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952

The Surge is Working and Victory is Near

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


117 posted on 08/22/2007 4:50:56 PM PDT by bray (Member of the FR President Bush underground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952

Why is al-Douri still free?

Don’t trust al-Douri anymore than I trust the Russians.


125 posted on 08/22/2007 5:38:31 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952
Good news in deed. Our Marine son is in Ar Ramadi. Hope it makes his life easier.

[Mr] T

128 posted on 08/22/2007 5:52:46 PM PDT by trooprally (Never Give Up - Never Give In - Remember Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952


Hillary: "During his trip to Iraq last week, Senator Levin ... confirmed that the Iraqi government is nonfunctional and cannot produce a political settlement because it is too beholden to religious and sectarian leaders," as she called for Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to be replaced with a "less divisive and more unifying figure... Our best hope of fostering political progress in Iraq is to begin the immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops," she said.

The President: "I support him. It's not up to the politicians in Washington, D.C., to say whether he will remain in his position. It is up to the Iraqi people who now live in a democracy and not a dictatorship."

The proverbial crow has walked Hillary's face yet again, leaving it footprints. Surely she had a difficult meal, realizing she is running to be the next Commander in Chief while her foreign policy and military instincts remain abysmal.

.

130 posted on 08/22/2007 5:58:32 PM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Allegra
Ping....ping....ping.....

I hear the flutter of wings......see above...

135 posted on 08/22/2007 6:08:59 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952
Look, al-Maliki didn't do squat. :) I know, I know, to be "politic" for the face-saving cultural of the Arabs we might have to give credit to him.

The fact is American power is responsible for any good conditions that exist in Iraq.

136 posted on 08/22/2007 6:18:07 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952; Dog

Very interesting...


143 posted on 08/22/2007 6:58:25 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
Al-Douri has decided to deal directly with US forces in Iraq, according to al-Jashaami. He figures in the 55-card deck of "most wanted" officials from the former Iraqi regime issued by the US government. In return, for cooperating in the fight against al-Qaeda, al-Douri has asked for guarantees over his men's safety and for an end to Iraqi army attacks on his militias.
This is major. Not sure what Maliki has to do with it, though.
157 posted on 08/22/2007 8:19:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, August 20, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952

Bookmarked


164 posted on 08/22/2007 9:02:26 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952

We need the baathists to keep the filthy iranian backed shiites in check. Balance of power. I think from the beginning we should have kept a few of Saddam’s generals in charge of the military. Most of them would have done anything they were told as long has they got a paycheck.


168 posted on 08/22/2007 9:24:22 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952

Now if only Hillary and Obama would just STFU.

They are inviting disaster with this talk of resignation and Pakistan.


180 posted on 08/23/2007 12:06:30 AM PDT by Califreak (Go Hunter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952

It’s very telling when this thread on Clinton:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1885080/posts
is posted just below this thread on the sidebar.


183 posted on 08/23/2007 2:31:00 AM PDT by freema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952

Despite the drama queen headline, this is good news.

This is how Insurgencies end. Not with a big flag waving surrender ceremony but with a political deal. For example, the IRA never surrendered, instead the cut a political deal with the Brits.

Going to be hard for Americans to break them selves of the habit of thinking all wars are Conventional Wars. This sort war isn’t going to end with a bang, but with a political whimper. This is in effect, the Insurgents surrender.


192 posted on 08/23/2007 8:15:13 AM PDT by MNJohnnie ("Todays (military's) task is three dimensional chess in the dark". General Rick Lynch in Baghdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WBL 1952

I hope this report is true, as it is finally some good news. I would like to think that the administration heard and took heed to the calls of some of us who asked for a more direct(hard-fisted)approach to dealing with the insurgency in order to put an end to it. Now is not the time to go soft, but to increase the pressure being applied to AQ and other holdouts.


209 posted on 08/23/2007 11:33:38 AM PDT by semaj (Just shoot the bastards! * Your results may vary. Void where prohibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters

Shhhh...be verry verry quiet. The Dim-complicit media doesn’t want anyone to hear about this!


216 posted on 08/23/2007 4:11:10 PM PDT by lonevoice (It's always "Apologize to a Muslim Hour"...somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson