Hillary V. Ron Paul: How Would You Vote If those were the Nominees? (Vanity Poll)

August 23, 2007

[Austin Willard Wright]

An equally interesting poll question would be how folks here would vote if it was Lieberman (formerly known as Sore Loserman) v. Hillary.

[TommyDale]

Who would the third party choice be?

[darkangel82]

2 Democrats?

[Uri’el-2012]

NOTA

[cripplecreek]

Paul simply because he has plenty of conservative stances even though I disagree about the war.

[Patrick1]

I would vote for Paul. There is simply no way I would vote for someone who, like her husband finds the United States not worth defending and owes all her campaign money to the Chi-Coms.

Paul sucks too but at least he won’t raise taxes and I would work my ass off for a candidate for 2012.

[trisham]

It’s not going to happen.

[apocalypto]

Of course Ron Paul over Hillary. What a questions. Not even close. (I prefer Hunter).

[ElkGroveDan]

What a stupid question.

How would people vote if it were Napoleon vs. Genghis Khan?

[brownsfan]

I’d vote for Charles Manson before I’d vote for Hillary!

[enough_idiocy]

Ron Paul
Joe L.

[pacelvi]

I would vote with a bullet in my head.

[MrB]

I’ll vote for Fred Thompson.

Or, whoever is the GOP nominee running against Hillary.

[RepublitarianRoger]

I guess I’d use the ABC rule: Anyone But Clinton.

[cake_crumb]

I wouldn’t vote for Clinton OR Paul.

Al Gore was Sore Loserman, not Joe Leiberman.

[Augustinian monk]

Ditka v NY Giants- Ditka 21-3

[Retired Greyhound]

Mark Foley is the only Republican I would not vote for over Hillary.

If I HAD to choose (gun to head) between Hillary, Obama or Edwards, I would take Hillary.

[Virginia Ridgerunner]

Ron Paul, but only because he would be the theoretical lesser of two weevils.

[trisham]

LOL! Me, too. :)

[DM1]

well i would vote for Paul even though i dont agree with him on every issue
of course i would vote for Fred (enthusiastically), Mitt, Rudy and just about anyone else to prevent Hillary winning the white house