Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt owns stock in stem cell research
Boston Herald ^ | 8-15-07 | Casey Ross

Posted on 08/17/2007 8:28:33 AM PDT by 14themunny

Despite his “pro-life” campaign pitch, former Gov. Mitt Romney owns stock in two companies involved in embryonic stem cell research, a controversial field of study he previously cited as the reason for his rightward shift on abortion.

Romney holds stock in the biomedical firms Novo Nordisk and Millipore Corp., both of which use human embryos to research cures for chronic diseases, records show. Many conservatives fiercely oppose the research because it destroys the embryos in the process.

“I believe (pulling the investments) is a step he should take,” said Mildred Jefferson, president of Massachusetts Citizens for Life. “I do believe (Romney) is an honorable man, and having declared that he understands the ethical violation in embryonic stem cell research, I feel certain he would not want to have his money go to support it.”

In his public actions, Romney has occupied a middle ground on stem cell research. He has supported research using excess embryos created at

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bostonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hypocrite; prolife; romney; stemcell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: All

This is really, really weak. There is a significant question here of why a blind trust’s portfolio content, of which Romney could not be aware, was made known to the press.

As for being able to do something about it — I am not sure he can. The problem he faces is . . . the story may not be true. He cannot ask to see the contents of the trust in order to verify the story.

If he believed it was true, he can’t dictate the content of the blind trust. All he can do is dissolve it and open another, and not know if THAT trust manager does the same thing.


41 posted on 08/17/2007 9:16:32 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Who said that? As soon as he learned of it (or it became UNblind), he has moved to divest from the investments that do not align with his personal and political principles. I'd say that is doing exactly the right thing about it in a timely fashion.

Those who want to use it for political purposes are truly scraping the bottom of the barrel due to so little ammunition otherwise, I guess. Must of gotten old claiming he was too rich, too smart, too good-looking, too well-organized, too slick, too savvy etc...

42 posted on 08/17/2007 9:17:03 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate (www.MittReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

yes, and saying that it is in a blind trust doesn’t cut it. He needs to know how his millions are helping to promote the culture of death! Come on now...


43 posted on 08/17/2007 9:17:11 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate

...Too liberal...too “flip-floppy”...


44 posted on 08/17/2007 9:18:31 AM PDT by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 14themunny

So what? It’s a hedge fund. It owns investments in nearly 2,000 companies. Leave it to the leftists to moan about “socially responsible” investments. Mitt’s fund bases their investments on earnings and charts, as it should be.


45 posted on 08/17/2007 9:19:36 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

-oh boy. First Edwards, now Romney.


46 posted on 08/17/2007 9:21:03 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
I wonder how many of these “pro-lifers” on FR own shares of the same company, via their mutual funds and 401ks.

You know it has to be a distinct possibility that some of our 401Ks do invest in the same company or other companies that conflict with our stated moral views. Might be a good eye-opener to get more proactive and informed as to what's going on if it is important to you since most of us do not have blind trusts.

47 posted on 08/17/2007 9:28:04 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate (I am sick and tired of the holier than thous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Leave it to the leftists to moan about “socially responsible” investments. Mitt’s fund bases their investments on earnings and charts, as it should be.
________

LOL. So I guess this gets Mr. Edwards off the hook for his investment is a hedge fund that is linked to subprime loans and foreclosures in New Orleans.

Seems that the investments one makes are fodder for the gristmill regardless of where one sits on the political spectrum. Several threads out there questioning Edwards for this. Is it still good for the gander if it’s good for the goose?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1882559/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1882493/posts


48 posted on 08/17/2007 9:29:09 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tioga
Novo Nordisk

I can't say that any of mutual funds have never owned this.

49 posted on 08/17/2007 9:31:03 AM PDT by NeoCaveman ("I mean, he's gone from Jane Fonda to Dr. Strangelove in one week." - Romney on B. Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Right, thats why they endorsed Shannon O’Brien in 2002.


50 posted on 08/17/2007 9:32:01 AM PDT by MassachusettsGOP (May the West and Republicans Always Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MassachusettsGOP

Right. That’s why it was Mitt Romney’s main outlet for getting out his liberal message all those years.


51 posted on 08/17/2007 9:33:01 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (States' rights can never trump God-given, unalienable rights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 14themunny; All

The most important thing people should remember is that Mitt Romney still supports the destruction of “unwanted” human embryos.

His “conversion” is a farce.


52 posted on 08/17/2007 9:37:49 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (States' rights can never trump God-given, unalienable rights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 14themunny; All

Another important thing for people to know is that Mitt Romney also supports cloning embryos, disabling them, and then robbing the body parts for experimentation. It is a process called “altered nuclear transfer.” It, like Mitt Romney, is a sham.


53 posted on 08/17/2007 9:40:42 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (States' rights can never trump God-given, unalienable rights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmz; tioga

Rush pointed out that Edward’s initial investment in these ventures was not done through a BLIND TRUST. So no, it is not the same thing.


54 posted on 08/17/2007 9:43:10 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate (I am sick and tired of the holier than thous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale; Reagan Man; AFA-Michigan; Gelato
Embryonic Stem Cell Research Financier Joins Pro-Gay Fundraiser To Host Mitt Romney San Diego Event - Thursday, February 22, 2007
55 posted on 08/17/2007 9:45:02 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (States' rights can never trump God-given, unalienable rights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

“Also, Stem Cell research is legal. They get government funding if they are using current lines.
Is that is what is happening here?”

Abortion is legal too... Romney claims to oppose abortion because of research he did into stem cells... And yet clearly he invests in (aka helps fund) companies that use stem cells in their research.

AND he is on record as stating that blind trusts are not an excuse.

This does knock my confidence in him down a peg.


56 posted on 08/17/2007 9:47:57 AM PDT by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate

-excellent point.

BUT, there is just something so blase about them being sooo rich and thinking they can speak for us.


57 posted on 08/17/2007 9:48:42 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: COgamer

‘This does knock my confidence in him down a peg.’

So you think he’s backing stem cell research with his investments?

You honestly believe thats all those two companies do?

Wow.


58 posted on 08/17/2007 9:54:05 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: tioga; colorcountry; FastCoyote; MHGinTN; Pan_Yans Wife; svcw; Enosh; Elsie; aMorePerfectUnion; ...

PINGALING


59 posted on 08/17/2007 9:55:49 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (I think all legal Americans should get 5 votes apiece to make up for the "new" voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate

Rush pointed out that Edward’s initial investment in these ventures was not done through a BLIND TRUST. So no, it is not the same thing.
_______

Can you document that Mitt’s investment in the stem cell companies were done by the blind trust and not Mitt himself? That would seem to have some bearing on your comment. You mean Rush didn’t look into it that far? Shocking.


60 posted on 08/17/2007 10:13:25 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson