Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you want to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
Posted on 08/16/2007 9:30:03 AM PDT by Plutarch
*************
Hunter isn't making any friends with you as a supporter.
"Federal campaign law requires broadcasters to give all candidates equal time on the airwaves. That rule applies to entertainment programs like "Law & Order," meaning stations which run the show would be required to give other GOP candidates a like amount of prime time television exposure.
With as many as a dozen or more Republican candidates competing for the nomination, that would be prohibitively expensive.
"As a practical matter, [the television stations] would in all likelihood have to pull all of the Fred Thompson shows for the duration of his candidacy," said Andrew Jay Schwartzman, president of the Media Access Project."
More:
Thompson has already announced that he will not be returning to Law and Order in September, and it would seem likely that many TV stations will not be running movies in which he has appeared once his candidacy becomes official and he is legally qualified.
Therefore, I would say September is the answer everyone is looking for.
Bookmarking for November 2008 retrospective when Fred wins.
Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you want to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
I guess the writer knows based on the number of times he has run for the office.
God what a moron!
I don’t speak for Hunter, trisham. I am free and over 21. I have my own opinions.
Me, too.
I think we should all ignore any campaigning, polls, debates until 3 months before the election.
It’s to the point of stupidity that we start two years before an election.
Whatever. Fred will be POTUS in 2009.
There is no doubt in my mind that Thompson missed the crest.
He’s still, though, one of the most viable candidates, imho, to conservatives.
I don’t know why he waited so long.
This idiotic race to move all the primaries up to New Years eve, and to frontload everything to pick the nominee based on a few states....it's ridiculous.
Anything Thompson can do to reverse this trend is a good thing.
They are all suffering from premature electioneering.
“I think Fred may be rethinking whether he even wants the job. You can’t have a winning candidate who doesn’t have the conviction to run. That’s what all this indecision says to me. Fred can talk a good game but he doesn’t have the stones to jump in.”
I’m wondering if he make a “not-running” announcement, despite his repeated comments on Hannity to the contrary.
We don’t gnat slap adverse Fredheads on Hunter threads. To the contrary, they are stimulating and we welcome them.
*************
If I were Hunter I'd be embarrassed. The way some of his supporters behave is tacky. It makes him look like, well, someone who would have them as fans.
Oh, I get it. You're actually a Fred supporter, trying to make Hunter look bad. Got it.
Al Gore hasn’t announced yet either.
Reid Wilson takes on blind faith the heads of both the RNC and DNC can ‘dictate’ how an election cycle is going to run.
The facts say otherwise. The average voter isn’t paying any attention to this way too early nonsense, much to the chagrin of both parties HQ dear leaders.
All thats being accomplished by this ridiculous ‘perpetual campaign’ nonsense is those running are going to set records for money spent on ‘the campaign’.
Thats it. Nothing has happened as a result of this year early starting gun thats made the race any clearer.
The time to evaluate who’s strategy was the best will be next year in 2008.
Not in August of 2007.
It amazes me that there seems to be a gratuitous assumption going around (which is the only way I know to describe it) that those Law & Order reruns will have to be pulled once Fred Thompson officially announces his candidacy.
Why?
I believe that in the 1970s there was some flap over a similar situation when Fred Grandy (The Love Boat's "Gopher") ran successfully for Congress. But even then, the claims against Grandy were highly tenuous, I thought (to put it as charitably as possible). Moreover, the idiotic "Fairness Doctrine"--in which these specious claims were grounded--has since gone the way of the stegasaurus.
So under what conceivable principle could others demand that the L&O reruns be pulled--while still being able to keep a straight face?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.