Posted on 08/16/2007 8:36:45 AM PDT by george76
“A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality.” That certainly seems to be the case with former gun-control advocate Michael DeBose, an Ohio state legislator. DeBose’s epiphany was not a result of being mugged by reality, but by being mugged by a couple of gun-toting thugs in his own neighborhood.
DeBose told Gun Week, the periodical of The Second Amendment Foundation, that he was taking a walk around his quiet residential neighborhood on the evening of May 1 when he was accosted by two men, one of whom was armed with a handgun. The unarmed DeBose took the only option available to him — he ran to a neighbor’s home and pounded on the door...
Long an advocate of stricter gun-control laws, DeBose, along with his wife and several neighbors, have since enrolled in classes to obtain concealed-carry permits.
DeBose’s apparent conversion might not sit well with antigun colleagues, but as he said, “until someone has had a gun pulled on them and stuck in their face...
(Excerpt) Read more at gazette.com ...
.
Rowan gained public notoriety on June 14, 1988, when he shot a teenage tresspasser, Neil Smith, who was taking a dip in Rowan's swimming pool in Washington, D.C.. Rowan used an unregistered .22 LR pistol.Rowan was a strict gun control advocate. In a 1981 column, he advocated " a law that says anyone found in possession of a handgun except a legitimate officer of the law goes to jail -- period." In 1985, he called for "A complete and universal federal ban on the sale, manufacture, importation and possession of handguns (except for authorized police and military personnel)."
Immediately after the shooting, Rowan offered several conflicting accounts about where he got the handgun. He first said that he had purchased the gun himself in response to threats on his life (which he later claimed had been made by the Ku Klux Klan). He also initially claimed that the gun had been properly registered. However, when District of Columbia police disclosed that the gun had not been registered, Rowan changed his story, claiming that the gun belonged to his son, who "was an FBI agent and did not have to register it [because it was] properly registered federally." Police officials pointed out that under D.C. law, all guns must be registered locally; failure to do so was punishable by up to a year in prison and a $1,000 fine.
Rowan was tried but the jury was deadlocked, the judge declared a mistrial and he was never retried. In his autobiography, Rowan said he still favors gun control.
Another convert! B-slapped by reality.
I thought that was ““A NEOCON is a liberal who has been mugged.”.........
5.56mm
Let’s hope he’ll still allow others to own guns.
Like Saul on the road to Damascus . . .
And I too am in favor of gun control the way it is now. Convicted felons cannot legally purchase or possess a handgun for 7-10 years after their felony conviction. People convicted of aggravated assault, attempted murder, etc., too should not be allowed to own handguns.
Couldna happened to a more deserving guy!
Much as I dislike hearing about anyone being robbed, if it’s going to happen it should happen to one of those who was dedicated to depriving the rest of us of our means for self-defense.
It was probably an OJ jury. Pathetic.
To anyone who knows DC, that was no surprise.
DC is the National Academy for "O.J. Juries"...
Just saying.
Why does this prohibition apply to ex-felons (i.e., convicted felons who have served the sentence duly imposed by a court of law and thereby paid their debt to society) who did not commit a felonious act of violence against persons or did not use a firearm or other instrument of death or bodily harm in the commission of a felony? For example, certain “white-collar” crimes are felonies, and are committed using implements such as paper and writing instruments and computers, et cetera. What has this to do with being denied use of a firearm for self-defense after having served the required prison term and/or paid any monetary penalities imposed?
Signed,
Puzzled
Obviously the perpetrators hadn’t legally obtained their guns or had been prevented from getting them by draconian gun laws.
No, what happened to the kid?
Besides the fact that he got shot, I don't remember. I remember that there might have been two boys who went for a dip and Rowan shot one.
As this happened long ago, I've forgotten the details.
Rowan shot the kid with a .22 long, so I don't remember it being lethal.
So then all we have to do is mug the liberals and they’ll roll over on the second amendment thingy ?
Cool...
Most sane people can figure out that it is a good idea to be able to defend yourself before they get rolled.
The real test of his “conversion” will be in how he votes on the next Gun Grab in the legislature. Plenty of Grabbers have guns, or armed guards, or both.
I think too, after someone has paid their debt to society, certain assumptions must be let go to.
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.