Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New airport agents check for danger in fliers' facial expressions
McClatchy Newspapers ^ | August 14, 2007 | Kaitlin Dirrig

Posted on 08/15/2007 7:39:06 AM PDT by Dan Evans

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged
The agency which is forbidden to profile the way that Israel does?

This is exactly profiling the way Israel does it. And it's about time.

21 posted on 08/15/2007 8:01:24 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

I think we’ve gone way overboard with TSA security. We should leave it to the people and the private sector. Our federal government is stupid and way too incompetent to be left in charge of such an important issue.


22 posted on 08/15/2007 8:01:38 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
Not to worry, TSA is on the job!


23 posted on 08/15/2007 8:02:57 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
My wife and I boarded a flight from Palermo to Milan shortly after 9-11. We sat in the front row and noticed immediately that the cockpit door was open and left open after take off.

We asked one of the fashionable dressed attendants about the open door.

He said that he looked at each passenger when they boarded and if he was comfortable he left the door open.

I guess flights in and out of Palermo probably have additional insurance from local community groups.

24 posted on 08/15/2007 8:02:58 AM PDT by pierstroll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Anyone with these "facial expressions" should be strongly considered for a the full frisking.

25 posted on 08/15/2007 8:04:47 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Confidence in Congress has hit an all-time low of 14%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
This program sounds Orwellian, but I don't think that it is. I think that it's the way the article is written.

The Isrealis have been doing this a whole lot longer than we have. Right now, the controls that we have in place are really just designed to annoy people (I've never heard of anyone being attacked with nail clippers, for instance....). Bringing in some people that really know what they're doing is a good start, IMHO.

Analyzing the people that are actual threats (PROFILING!!!) is a good, IMHO. Maybe this will introduce a little sanity....searching little old ladies and 6 month old babies because people "need to be randomly selected..." might finally go away.

Of course, this *is* the TSA. I'm not sure that some the people I've dealt with in Airport Security could find their own ass with both hands and map in broad daylight.

26 posted on 08/15/2007 8:07:08 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Yikes. What happens when you have been standing in a 2 hour line, and finally get to the checkpoint? Your face might not be so happy. How about adding that you’re flying to a relative’s funeral?

Who knew how prescient ‘1984’ would be?


27 posted on 08/15/2007 8:07:56 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (If the families still ran Las Vegas, Harry Reid would be napping at the bottom of Hoover Dam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

I was never in favor of creating the TSA. But that’s a question for another session of congress. Private security would be fine with me, though having been flying for many years I remember also the complaints pre-TSA about the pitiful quality of employees that were doing screening at airports. It was a joke. Few even spoke english. While the TSA is the bloat-ware solution, and overboard just like anything that government does, it is better than it used to be back then. But sure, there’s room for improvement.

I see this as finally starting to get into the more advanced techniques that will actually work better.


28 posted on 08/15/2007 8:08:11 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
American officers receive 16 hours of training — far less than their Israeli counterparts_ because U.S. officials want to be less intrusive.

Isn't that counter-intuitive? Wouldn't MORE training make you better at detecting without being detected?

29 posted on 08/15/2007 8:09:44 AM PDT by Don W (Still searching for another pithy yet erudite tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
This person should be charged with a facecrime.


30 posted on 08/15/2007 8:12:19 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill
The Isrealis have been doing this a whole lot longer than we have

Yes they have, and with very great success.

31 posted on 08/15/2007 8:12:28 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Oh joy! Surely these agents will protect us from the danger of the 80-year old granny from Oklahoma who’s nervous and apprehensive about being screened by a bumbling, surly TSA thug.

If granny flinches the wrong way for a millisecond, it’s a cavity search and a waterboarding.

Whew, I feel safer already!


32 posted on 08/15/2007 8:13:50 AM PDT by Mr J (All IMHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
They were flickers of expression that lasted no more than a fraction of a second.

And the human eye after 16 hours of "training" will be able to pick up on this?

33 posted on 08/15/2007 8:16:15 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl
Your face might not be so happy.

Yeesh, people... this is NOT about looking for happy or unhappy people. It's about reading people. We all do it to one extent or another. Sometimes you can tell that somebody's mannerisms, expressions, personality... just doesn't fit right with who they are, what they're doing or what's going on around them...

It's not mind reading or thought police. It's seeing somebody in the line or in the waiting area that seems to have a different plan than everybody else getting on that plane.

34 posted on 08/15/2007 8:16:18 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

KLM airlines out of Schipol use one on one interrogations for international passengers.


35 posted on 08/15/2007 8:24:02 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (If you agee with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

I do not have faith that the current TSA clerk could possibly have the skills to do this with 16 hours of training.


36 posted on 08/15/2007 8:24:31 AM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
As one that flies many times a month and having dealt many times with the mental midgets the TSA has hired to do security, this will only give them one more reason to screw with everyday passengers.

It is one thing to teach sophisticated techniques to enhance our security. This assumes those you are teaching have the mental capacity to truly understand and implement these techniques.

It is quite another thing to attempt to teach these techniques to the low IQ boobs they have working at the TSA.

This will do nothing to enhance security unless the very first thing they teach is to focus attention on middle eastern males. But, political correctness will not allow that. So, they will be using these face reading techniques on grandma, babies in strollers, priests, old white men, and hot looking babes they just want to impress with their power.

37 posted on 08/15/2007 8:26:43 AM PDT by technomage (The true Conservative politician will win every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

ping


38 posted on 08/15/2007 8:28:05 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThisLittleLightofMine

That’s nice.


39 posted on 08/15/2007 8:33:09 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

I have a better idea....

get rid of the long lines through security. Instead pull aside anyone that remotely resembles a Muslim and any “soft impressionable white boys” and grill them. Let the rest of us pass through and go on about our business.


40 posted on 08/15/2007 8:34:51 AM PDT by cowdog77 (" Are there any brave men left in Washington, or are they all cowards?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson