Posted on 08/14/2007 11:30:38 PM PDT by gpapa
Will the execution-style murder of three young students in Newark, N.J., finally turn the tide in the immigration enforcement debate? Will we at last abandon the deadly, chaotic, lawless sanctuary nation experiment and restore America's lost status as a sovereign nation under the rule of law?
The death of six innocent men and women and the injury of more than 1,000 at the hands of several illegal alien 1993 World Trade Center bombers wasn't enough to convince politicians in New York and across this country to end illegal alien sanctuary policies.
The death of nearly 3,000 innocent men, women and children at the hands of the 9/11 jihadists who exploited our lax entrance and visa enforcement policies in 2001 wasn't enough.
The death of 10 innocent men and women in the Washington, D.C., area at the hands of an illegal alien sniper and his bloodthirsty mentor in 2002 wasn't enough.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
bump
If it were really “our choice” there wouldn’t be a problem.
“Will the execution-style murder of three young students in Newark, N.J., finally turn the tide in the immigration enforcement debate?”
Oh heck no!
The argument is already far, far, far away from the fact that a felonious illegal committed the murders and is now on the general lawlessness that has been caused by....anything but.
This is a ping list promoting Immigration Enforcement and Congressional Reform.
If you wish to be added or removed from this ping list, please contact me.
A little light on material this a.m. I'm sure there'll be more during the day...
Help For Illegal Immigration Crimes List
Guatemalan arrested in crash (drunk illegal, hit-and-run, 2 Americans die)
Gingrich 'sickened' with Bush, Congress ("young Americans..massacred by illegal immigrants)
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
btt
ping
B T T T
BUMP
It's not? Tell me who did elect the Chief Executive--the person who is responsible for enforcing the law of our republic? Anyone who hasn't contacted the White House with disapproval and called for change in policy or resignation or impeachment is someone who has made a "choice" of tacit support.
Don't know what all the hub bub is about sanctuary cities. They are just following the Feds lead.
Allow me to don my tin foil hat here for a moment and say that the deciding seems to be done before we even vote in the primaries. Nobody I knew wanted GW to be the Republican nominee, but somehow we got stuck with him. What a big-spending, open borders disaster he turned out to be. I doubt very much that the nominee this time will turn out to be a true conservative, either.
Recall that FR didn't want him, either, in 1999.
But also recall that many of the people out there are not conservatives and/or don't keep themselves up on the information that most FReepers know.
Now don’t go getting all hot and lathered up. “Our” is the people making a choice now like which we did last month or so with the deluging Congress with faxes, emails, phone calls and whatever else. America has already spoken vehemently on this subject.
Liberals will destroy the country for one more vote to keep them in power.
Michelle Malkin should be Secretary of Homeland Security in the Fred Thompson administration.
Recall that FR didn't want him [Bush], either, in 1999.Who did many FR people support in those days?
Then don’t sit back, get involved. We made our voices heard with the immigration bill. Now it’s time to do the same with sanctury cities. We must demand that the President and SOME members of congress threaten to hold back federal funds to states the allow thier cities to renain sanctuaries to illegal’s of all ethnic groups. The liberal progressive’s will spin this into “This country was built on immigrants” YES LEGAL ONES! AND WE DECIDED WHO ENTERS AND WHO DOESN’T. We have lost our way, because while we were asleep the rats were playing! It is time we take control before it is to late! This must come from the President or the President elect! Remember this is one issue of survival
I’m all in favor of sanctuary cities. They’d be liberal cities anyway and let them pay for it and it would serve as a “model” city to what the consequences would be: a dead city. If you have too many moths all over the place you turn on a bright light and they’ll come to it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.