Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Murdoch taking aim at N.Y. Times (Dinosaur Media DeathWatchâ„¢)
Los Angeles Times ^ | August 13, 2007 | Joseph Menn

Posted on 08/13/2007 9:47:49 AM PDT by abb

Despite his remarks on coverage, some expect changes on the Journal's business side first.

If the Gray Lady didn't have enough problems battling industrywide woes, now she has Rupert Murdoch to worry about.

The media billionaire has made no secret of his desire to take aim at the New York Times once his News Corp. acquires Dow Jones & Co. and its flagship Wall Street Journal in a $5-billion deal expected to close this fall.

Murdoch said during an earnings conference call last week that he wanted the financial newspaper to have "more coverage of national, international and nonbusiness news . . . all to better compete with the New York Times and other national newspapers."

In private, Murdoch has been more blunt.

"Rupert thinks the Times is vulnerable," a longtime senior executive said. "He's going to go after them."

Like other newspapers across the country, the Times has been tightening its belt and has seen its stock price languish as readers and advertisers migrate to the Web. Nonetheless, it has fared better than other publications, retaining much of its circulation and advertising by remaining the essential newspaper of the East Coast elite.

So where does Murdoch believe the Times is vulnerable?

At a meeting early last week News Corp. executives mulled over that question but have yet to form a definitive plan.

Murdoch has publicly signaled he will beef up editorial coverage, adding four pages to the paper and hiring more staff in Europe and Asia. Murdoch also is thinking about expanding the Journal's franchise on global financial news.

But several current and former employees said they thought Murdoch was coyly talking up what he might do to the news operation to draw attention away from his more immediate plan -- an attack on the Times' business side.

snip

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dbm; murdoch; newscorp; newspapers; nyt; pinch; rupert; wsj

1 posted on 08/13/2007 9:47:52 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; backhoe; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...

ping


2 posted on 08/13/2007 9:48:29 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

That freak out the Gay Mafia at the Grey Hag.


3 posted on 08/13/2007 9:49:04 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
Murdoch taking aim at N.Y. Times

The Times is a slow, fat and not very bright target. It's like hunting a cow with a machine gun.

4 posted on 08/13/2007 9:50:15 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

What a waste of time ! The NYT is dying a natural death and Rupert is going to try to kill it ?


5 posted on 08/13/2007 9:55:45 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
The Times is a slow, fat and not very bright target. It's like hunting a cow with a machine gun.

LOL!

I pray the Rupert is a man of his word, and up to the task he is clearly setting out for himself. The sooner he can drive the NY Slimes out of its evil business, THE BETTER!


6 posted on 08/13/2007 9:59:41 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb
That’s a good photoshop of a NatLamp classic.

Would it be possible to replace the headlines with some things one might see in the NYT? For example: “Top Secret Iraq Battle Plans Revealed”, or “Trans fats banned in NY — Fat Trannies Still Welcome” (the latter stolen from an “American Dad” episode).

7 posted on 08/13/2007 10:04:15 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
"Rupert thinks the Times is vulnerable," a longtime senior executive said. "He's going to go after them."

I'll subscribe to the Journal, if that helps, and I don't subscribe to anything.

8 posted on 08/13/2007 10:07:57 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
More bad news for The Fey Lady...

Go Rupert Murdoch!

9 posted on 08/13/2007 10:25:40 AM PDT by gridlock (I have taken a sacred vow to always maintain a smaller carbon footprint than Al Gore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"One clue to the future lies in Murdoch's public musing about whether to make all or most of the Journal's website free, junking a million subscriptions of as much as $79 per year."

The Financial Times also has a subscription structure. However, when it comes to online stuff, there is ten times more info available without subscription at the FT than WSJ that can be used.

yitbos

10 posted on 08/13/2007 10:48:48 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: abb

It would be worth it for Murdoch to take over the NYT just to hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth from the moonbats.


11 posted on 08/13/2007 10:50:59 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I had hoped that FT would buy WSJ or merge with them somehow...


12 posted on 08/13/2007 10:51:38 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: abb

Hey ABB would that be something if Rupert Murdoch decided buy NY liars OMGG check out outcry LOLOLOL!


13 posted on 08/13/2007 10:56:40 AM PDT by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I’d love to see Rupert make Pinch Sulzberger his bitch. I’m sure he could pull it off if he lives long enough.


14 posted on 08/13/2007 10:58:20 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: abb; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan
So where does Murdoch believe the Times is vulnerable?

Obviously, the same as all other media.

From the moderate all the way to conservative. That's a huge group of people.

What's the advantage of print over internet: (1) Large View, (2) Page turning, therefore, (3) reads faster

15 posted on 08/13/2007 11:02:50 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Any opinions around here on News Corp stock?


16 posted on 08/13/2007 11:22:38 AM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

He maight have to pay the Stalin family some royalties since Duranty confessed to being a Kremlin mouthpiece.

http://ucca.org/ucca/famine/gordondispatch.html


17 posted on 08/13/2007 11:23:27 AM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
These toons are a great insight to how the left wing maggot infected mediots are looking at Rupert's take over of the WSJ. They leave no doubt that the WSJ was a liberal whack job fishwrap before the takeover.

These toons show what the left wing mediots are really concerned about. Murdoch will hasten the demise of the NY Slimes with his new WSJ as the news center of record and reality. Last but not least, Murdoch will enforce reality as news not left wing lies, pr and agendas posing as news:


18 posted on 08/13/2007 11:40:42 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Donate to Vets For Freedom: http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb
The NY times is an arm of the Democratic Party. Plain and simple.
19 posted on 08/13/2007 2:56:06 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson