Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When mothers keep a deadly secret (Murdering Newborns)
LA Times ^ | 13 August 2007 | Geoff McKee

Posted on 08/13/2007 4:35:05 AM PDT by shrinkermd

...Few crimes generate greater public reaction than neonaticide: when a mother kills her baby, or leaves it to die, on the day she gives birth. We are repelled, yet mesmerized, as details emerge. How could a woman deny being pregnant for so many months? How could no one notice? How could a mother murder her newborn?

As a forensic psychologist, I have evaluated 32 mothers who were charged with killing one or more of their children. Fourteen-year-old "Cathy" was one. She had been repeatedly molested by her stepfather, gave birth alone in her bedroom, and then threw her newborn against the wall. "Edna," a college freshman, was so indecisive about ending her pregnancy that she suffocated her minutes-old baby in an act of delayed abortion.

Cathy and Edna denied and hid their pregnancies, common in neonaticide cases, particularly among teens pregnant for the first time. That was also true in the recent Anaheim case in which a 17-year-old visiting from Indiana allegedly gave birth in a Denny's restroom; police said that neither her parents nor her boyfriend knew she was pregnant. (That baby was found alive in a trash can and hospitalized; the mother has been charged with felony child abuse and neglect.)

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionmurder; infanticide; murder; neonaticide; newborns; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: CharlesWayneCT

so many parts of our society, are with the mindset of having a baby is a really bad thing, I am not surprised that these women are behaving in this manner.


21 posted on 08/13/2007 6:25:39 AM PDT by television is just wrong (deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END WELFARE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
But...if you can't trust me with a choice, how can you trust me with a child?

Don't know why that popped into my head...

22 posted on 08/13/2007 6:28:27 AM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Few crimes generate greater public reaction than neonaticide...

True, most of which consists of blaming and trash talking the father.

23 posted on 08/13/2007 6:29:51 AM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
It looks like I’m coming full-out in favor of what has been called “gender stereotyping” and against the gender-free, “Free To Be You And Me” autonomy/androgyny thing that has consumed child-culture for the past 40 years.

Absolutely. Repolarization is essential - but a generation of feminist-trained educators and politicians may have to die off first.

24 posted on 08/13/2007 6:32:28 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOPPachyderm

It may be a new term, but infanticide is an old practice.


25 posted on 08/13/2007 6:39:00 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sumocide

When a rabbit or rat kills newborns, it means something is bad wrong; this is always indicative of either a sick animal or a gravely defective environment.

A great deal of our human environment is cultural. Related to my point: we have a gravely defective culture.


26 posted on 08/13/2007 6:40:49 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee

“This is where abortion has taken us.”

Infanticide has been around for a long time.


27 posted on 08/13/2007 6:41:18 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
gave birth alone in her bedroom, and then threw her newborn against the wall. "Edna," a college freshman, was so indecisive about ending her pregnancy that she suffocated her minutes-old baby in an act of delayed abortion.

However, if a physician (I use the term loosely) had of plunged scissors into the top of the babies head and sucked its brains out before it cleared the birth canal, it would have been perfectly legal. The first act is murder but the second act is legally sanctioned. Something is not right!

28 posted on 08/13/2007 6:42:14 AM PDT by cpdiii (Pharmacist, Pilot, Geologist, Oil Field Trash and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

“Trust me with a choice” is specious because nobody -— not the Church, not the State, not the male, and not the female -— nobody can choose the deliberate killing of the young of our species as a legitimate “choice.”

If a woman has a baby she cannot bond to, will not raise and does not want, that’s what adoption is for.


29 posted on 08/13/2007 6:45:34 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GOPPachyderm
"“Delayed abortion” - is that a new term?"

I refer to it as, "Singer-cide"

30 posted on 08/13/2007 6:45:37 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
"Infanticide has been around for a long time."

Quite true. So has abortion. Not to mention rape, vengeance-slaying, the abandonment of elderly and disabled, and the deification of tyrant kings. It's part of what the Decalogue was written to prevent.

31 posted on 08/13/2007 6:49:31 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

” I think the normal, healthy animal instincts in the human species are surprisingly weak.”

Gotta disagree there. The instinct to care for offspring is very strong in man compared to other species. Humans generally provide extraordinary care to their young. It is comprehensive and of long duration. It is necessary, of course, to support the rather long maturation of an animal whose brain takes up so much volume and energy.


32 posted on 08/13/2007 6:50:03 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Few crimes generate greater public reaction than neonaticide: when a mother kills her baby, or leaves it to die, on the day she gives birth.

Some of the same people who are so incensed at this would think nothing of the baby being killed in the womb the day before birth.

33 posted on 08/13/2007 6:51:30 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Actually, they are more clear minded about this matter than any of us.

Well, I wouldn't say any. Some of us are quite clear-minded when it comes to knowing that abortion is murder no matter what stage of development the unborn child is.

34 posted on 08/13/2007 6:53:05 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gogeo; Mrs. Don-o
Don't know why that popped into my head ...

Perhaps because, under the influence of the relentless propaganda machine, you've forgotten that "choose" is a transitive verb. The act of "choosing" cannot, cannot, be separated from the object that is chosen.

Excepting the extremely rare preteen-victim-of-incestuous-rape situations, a woman who is pregnant with a child she doesn't want has already chosen to have sex under circumstances in which she could conceive a child she's not willing or competent to rear. That is, she has demonstrated that she does not have the discernment to make wise decisions regarding the life of another person.

As you mention, gogeo, she probably shouldn't be in the position of rearing a child, without a considerable development of maturity and judgment. Adoption would be a much better solution for many children born under these circumstances.

35 posted on 08/13/2007 6:59:59 AM PDT by Tax-chick (All the main characters die, and then the Prince of Norway delivers the Epilogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Very interesting thoughts.

I agree that cultural support for our best instincts - to care for those in need, whether that’s infants, the elderly, or the sick - is sadly lacking.

I suppose that to some extent, these instincts are correlated with traditional sex roles, but I don’t think so strongly that I’d make that a focus. I find in my family that everyone - boys and girls - wants to cuddle the babies and visit the elderly. (Cleaning up after the sick is not as popular.)


36 posted on 08/13/2007 7:05:37 AM PDT by Tax-chick (All the main characters die, and then the Prince of Norway delivers the Epilogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
" The instinct to care for offspring is very strong in man compared to other species. Humans generally provide extraordinary care to their young. It is comprehensive and of long duration. It is necessary, of course, to support the rather long maturation of an animal whose brain takes up so much volume and energy."

Right you are on every point except, I think, in calling that "instinct" tout court.

More accurate to call that instinct as vastly strengthened and elaborated by culture.

Our brains, which take up so much volume and energy, also enable us to develop morals and manners, customs and cultures, which support and refine the good healthy mammal instincts. And occasionally even empower us, when appropriate, to override instinct for an intellectually-grasped greater good.

For intance, the phenomenon of a society organized to support individuals born with missing or shortened limbs or diabetes or facial deformities (like my adopted son who was born with a cleft lip and palate) is unknown in any other species. Very often, per instinct, they kill their defectives.

So we have cultures. We cultivate, channel, strengthen, and refine our appetites tendencies, and drives. And sometimes redirect them, for good or ill.

37 posted on 08/13/2007 7:11:29 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
"I suppose that to some extent, these instincts are correlated with traditional sex roles, but I don’t think so strongly that I’d make that a focus. I find in my family that everyone - boys and girls - wants to cuddle the babies and visit the elderly. (Cleaning up after the sick is not as popular.)"

Depends on what your traditional sex roles are!

Some societies' highest male exemplar is the samurai, others the pimp, others the Talmud scholar. I would love for my boys' highest exemplar to be their excellent father. (In fact, in discouraging moments ---sigh--- my main hope lies in that.) And above all, Jesus Christ, our Lord.

Got me thinking now. Variety within sex roles. The Community of Saints.

38 posted on 08/13/2007 7:19:43 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee
Yep -- there is no distinction any more. Of course, we knew that -- but now the pro-abort society is acknowledging as much.
39 posted on 08/13/2007 7:23:45 AM PDT by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Depends on what your traditional sex roles are!

True. Your post #8 emphasized female nurturing, and unspecified features of "masculinity." I'm certainly not denying inborn differences between boys and girls - with three little boys in the house, I'm literally bombarded with inborn differences. (Also blocks, cars, Lego, shoes, and the occasional airborne brother.)

However, I think the qualities we're discussing come from a level of humanity more fundamental than sex differences. God created us male and female, but more basically, He created us in His image of life-giving love. Men and women (to generalize) manifest love in some distinctive ways, but the fountain of love, so to speak, is the same for both.

40 posted on 08/13/2007 7:34:05 AM PDT by Tax-chick (All the main characters die, and then the Prince of Norway delivers the Epilogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson