Posted on 08/10/2007 10:34:35 AM PDT by wagglebee
CALGARY, August 9, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In contrast with the media blackout that pro-life Canadians are used to expecting at their demonstrations, media coverage of the Reproductive Choice Campaign trucks rolling on Calgary streets this week has been lively. The trucks feature three-metre high photos of aborted children and an email address for more information.
Local papers and radio stations were joined by CBC and Global News who took video footage, while CTV News Calgary has run a two-minute television news spot three times in the last two days and included the sponsoring group's website address. This coverage constitutes a frenzy compared to the nearly total media blackout that is traditional at pro-life events such as the annual March for Life event in Ottawa.
The Calgary Sun headlined today's article, "Graphic abortion images shock Calgarians" and carried the CTV story verbatim in print form. A smaller local paper, Fast Forward Weekly, ran the headline "Little truck of horrors" and quoted Stephanie Gray, Executive Director of the Canadian Centre for Bioethical Reform, the truck's sponsoring group, responding to the accusations of shocking onlookers. "If there is nothing wrong with abortion, the images shouldn't bother them," she said.
A talk radio station, CHQR 770, has been broadcasting their report on the trucks every half hour from noon yesterday to five pm today. 630 CHED radio in Edmonton will carry a live 30-minute interview with Gray and she will be on 940 Montreal at 10:35 am EST for ten minutes.
CTV's video spot, which is available online, clearly shows close-ups of the photos and reporter Najuma Yagzan says, "You can clearly distinguish a body, hands and feet."
Jose Ruba, a cofounder and staffer of CCBR who today drove the support car accompanying the trucks, told LifeSiteNews.com that this was likely the first time the GAP pictures had been seen on English-language Canadian television.
"We had the GAP photos in Ottawa in 2004 when Planned Parenthood was giving Henry Morgentaler a lifetime achievement award and the national French-language TV used the images. But even when the CBC covered the controversy over the GAP display at UBC [in 2000], they only filmed the GAP images from 30 or 40 feet away."
"The whole story at UBC then was about the signs, but they didn't even show them. So today's coverage from so many sources was a big win for us in that they showed the signs," Ruba said.
Onlookers interviewed by CTV agreed that the images are "shocking" but also that they depict something true. "I've had nothing to do with it personally, so you don't think seriously about it, but looking at that, you can see the murder aspect of it all," one man said.
CTV offered a counter argument from a spokesman of Sexual Health Access Alberta (SHAA), but declined to mention that the group is an abortion advocating organization that until September 2006 was called Planned Parenthood Alberta. SHAA's Executive Director, Laura Wershler, criticised the tactic saying, "In those circumstances there's no opportunity for meaningful discussion or debate."
But Stephanie Gray told LifeSiteNews.com that she and her group were still waiting to hear back from Wershler on their offer of a public debate. Gray said, "I contacted Laura requesting a debate partner and I'm waiting to hear back from her and this is months ago."
CCBR said they contacted Wershler on November 16, 2006 on behalf of the pro-life club at the University of Calgary. "I emailed her a sample debate format and agreed that the debate should be a civil one with a neutral moderator."
"I'm still waiting to hear back from her," Gray said.
Wershler did not return calls from LifeSiteNews.com by deadline.
Onlookers interviewed by CTV, however, showed no signs of psychological trauma from seeing the photos. In one street interview, a young woman appeared unsettled but admitted that the images were depicting the reality of abortion, "To me, that's really harsh, but that's reality I guess. It's what happens when you have an abortion. But, wow, that is graphic, yeah."
Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Billboard-Size Abortion Photos to be Shown throughout Canada as Trucks Take the Message to the Streets
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/aug/07080802.html
Pro-Life GAP Display At UBC Causes an Uproar
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2000/oct/00102501.html
Bloggers Trump Mainstream Media With YouTube Videos of Canadian March for Life
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/may/07051705.html
Watch CTV coverage:
http://calgary.ctv.ca/servlet/RTGAMArticleHTMLTemplate/B/200...
It's sad.
I’m sorry your childhood was taken away as well.
I do too. that's why they're performing an essential service. They're reminding us all of how offensive abortion is.
We homeschool, thanks.
But when a truck pulls up on the beach at 2:00 on a schoolday, who are they targeting? Mothers and preschoolers.
&&&&
Could you please tell me where this happened? I am very involved with the Pro-Life movement, and have never heard of targetting pre-schoolers. I agree it is not appropriate, or useful. Do preschoolers even look at billboards? Their brains do not have the index files of context yet to process these images.
>The message can still be conveyed without the gore of it all
This is simply wishful thinking. The horror and evil of it is intrinsically tied in with the gore, when you take away the gore you are removing the horror, and that’s precisely why we’re at where we are, where people can pretend the 50 million dead babies doesn’t matter, because they aren’t horrified. If people were as horrified as they ought to be, the holocaust would end tomorrow.
Excuse me while I pray....
Thank you Holy Father for giving me the wonderful Pro-Life, tactful parents that you gave me.
Please teach all Pro-lifers that being a good parent does not mean exposing those blessings you gave them to things before they can handle them, even if it seems right.
And God Bless the Pre-born. Amen.
That’s the only way I can explain the attitude of people who are more outraged by the fact certain pictures are displayed than they are by the horrors depicted in those pictures.
######
Very well said!
Post 93, Lansing, MI
And I’m involved in the Pro-life movement as well, through my church.
Like I said, soft, so soft metrosexuals will be the majority in a few years.
After I finished stuffing envelopes (5 year olds don’t have chores anymore?) I rode my bike to the local baseball field. Played either baseball or football (In the outfield). Gee, and sometimes I would go fishing or swimming.
Yes my childhood was stolen because I saw some aborted babies. Give me a huge break. I would rather be faced with the truth than be dazzled and blinded by lies.
Do you have any proof that these trucks actually cut the abortion rate?
If not, then they are cons.
Rode you bike 10 miles to school, uphill both ways as well, I bet.
I wonder though, what kind of name do these trucks give Pro-Choice people?
Whatever name it gives us, it is better than murderer.
The church is part of the fault. The church has not been there for the post-abortives except with judgement and condemnation, rather than helping them. The real call for the church is to be there for them, help them with healing, extend compassion and let them know there is mercy, grace and forgiveness. Do these graphic pictures do this?
I agree that every effort should be made to ensure that small children do not see these images and I am not aware of any groups targeting areas where children might be.
THAT, my FRiend, should be the picture on all the trucks in the family venues.
Is that one yours?
You don’t have to show those horrors to children. Children should be protected.
>>I agree that every effort should be made to ensure that small children do not see these images and I am not aware of any groups targeting areas where children might be<<
Oh thank you!
I have to go now, math awaits!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.