Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eavesdropping law illegal, lawyers say
AP on Yahoo ^ | 8/9/07 | Paul Elias - ap

Posted on 08/09/2007 10:27:06 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

SAN FRANCISCO - Lawyers for Guantanamo Bay detainees asked a federal judge Thursday to invalidate a days-old law that lets government agents eavesdrop on suspected terrorists without first getting court-approved warrants.

They said the measure signed into law Sunday by President Bush is illegal because it gives the national intelligence director and the U.S. attorney general too much power to intercept communications of suspected terrorists overseas — even when they are talking to someone in the United States.

The New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights' lawsuit, along with about 50 others, are all being considered by U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker in San Francisco.

Center attorney Michael Avery said that what is called the Protect America Act "redefined the term of electronic surveillance and gives the government new powers, extraordinary powers, unprecedented powers."

In court documents filed Wednesday, government lawyers argued that the law's passage is enough legal grounds for a judge to toss out the Guantanamo detainees' lawsuit.

The center first sued the government last year after The New York Times revealed that the Bush administration had approved a warrantless eavesdropping program in late 2001. The center wants a judge to bar the government from eavesdropping on anyone in the United States without first obtaining a warrant.

The center argues that the program jeopardizes its ability to represent clients with suspected Al Qaeda ties because it cannot be sure that confidential telephone calls and e-mail correspondence with the Cuba detainees and their families overseas will stay private.

The center said Thursday that it also intends to argue in its suit that the new law is unconstitutional.

Government lawyers appearing in court declined to address the constitutionality of the new law, saying that argument is not yet part of the center's lawsuit against President Bush. But they have already gone on record stating their belief that the eavesdropping program is legal.

Also, government lawyer Anthony Coppolino said the government would have to reveal sensitive national security secrets to defend itself.

Walker ruled last year against the government's claim that to defend itself would require divulging security secrets and harm the war on terror. Walker ruled that there was little danger of that because the government's warrantless eavesdropping efforts have already been publicly exposed in the media.

Walker did not make a ruling Thursday.

The government's appeal will be heard Wednesday in San Francisco by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; eavesdropping; illegal; lawyers; protectamericaact

1 posted on 08/09/2007 10:27:08 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Liberals trying to undermine our national security on behalf of Al Qaeda. Bunch of charming folks - charming as a rattlesnake before it strikes.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 08/09/2007 10:30:31 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It wouldn’t surprise me to see the Ninth Circus help these bums out and have to be overturned by SCOTUS again.


3 posted on 08/09/2007 10:33:35 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“The center argues that the program jeopardizes its ability to represent clients with suspected Al Qaeda ties because it cannot be sure that confidential telephone calls and e-mail correspondence with the Cuba detainees and their families overseas will stay private.”

Nothing quite like throwing a rock into a pack of dogs and seeing which one yelps first, LOL.


4 posted on 08/09/2007 10:38:57 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Here’s an idea: Put these lawyers in Gitmo in the cell next to their clients, for sedition and treason! Also, how about a special pink cell block for Code Pink, Cindy Sheehan and Sean Penn?
5 posted on 08/09/2007 10:48:13 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Lawyers for Guantanamo Bay detainees

That says it all. And it'll be appealed to the 9th Circus, the most overturned circuit EVER. Bunch of bozos.

6 posted on 08/09/2007 10:48:17 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; All

Hmmmmm ..?? I didn’t know a MACHINE was called the US Attorney General.

That’s right .. the PERSON listening is a MACHINE. The machine is listening to conversations between SUSPECTED TERRORISTS or KNOWN TERRORISTS in and out of the USA.

Whenever the machine picks up a suspect word [don’t know how that’s programmed] then the call is listened to .. only then is the conversation recorded .. and only then is the conversation further interpreted by humans.

I heard this explanation from someone who helps run the program - I think they were testifying before congress.

This is NOT DOMESTIC SPYING.


7 posted on 08/09/2007 10:57:15 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America: THE GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

You are right about how the computer filters words. It is kind of like a funnel. It looks for certian words and phrases in sentences. If it hears these words, it filters it down more. The closer it gets to the bottom of the funnel, the more it monitors that certian call. It is also programmed to look for “Key words”.


8 posted on 08/09/2007 11:37:46 PM PDT by skimask (The Democratic mantra.."Appeasement works. I'd rather live my life on my knees than die standing up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skimask

Nominated by George H.W. Bush on September 7, 1989.


9 posted on 08/10/2007 12:14:36 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (When O'Reilly comes out from under his desk, tell him to give me a call. Hunter/Thompson in 08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"The government's appeal will be heard Wednesday in San Francisco by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals."

Oh .. well .. in that case, everything is alright.

Good things are starting to happen in and for America ... I sure hope no 'group' of noo yeowk loy yahs trumps proper law.

10 posted on 08/10/2007 1:00:12 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

My captors torment me with too much prayer time and a new Koran,
My friends are all here with me.
In my despair, I have nothing but entertainment for comfort,
For it is television which sustains me in my horribly cozy quarters
Surrounded by a disgusting lack of filth and no want for toiletries
To which I am a stranger.
May I live to see a day unfilled by placid contemplation, exercise and good meals!
May I live to flee from this free expert medical care!
May Allah be praised-ooh, a Twinkie!


11 posted on 08/11/2007 4:57:03 AM PDT by GFritsch ('All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved'." -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Center attorney Michael Avery said that what is called the Protect America Act “redefined the term of electronic surveillance and gives the government new powers, extraordinary powers, unprecedented powers

BULL before WWII we were intercepting the communications to the Japanese embassy and in many cases had them translated before the embassy.

12 posted on 08/11/2007 5:37:01 AM PDT by mouser (run the rats out its the only hope we have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson