Posted on 08/09/2007 1:18:21 PM PDT by blam
Ancient human fossils show women much smaller
Thu Aug 9, 2007 10:18AM EDT
NAIROBI (Reuters) - Homo erectus, long viewed as a crucial evolutionary link between modern humans and their tree-dwelling ancestors, may have been more ape-like than previously thought, scientists unveiling new-found fossils said on Thursday.
Revealing an ancient skull and a jawbone from two early branches of the human family tree -- Homo erectus and Homo habilis -- a team of Kenyan scientists said they were surprised to find that early female hominids were much smaller than males.
The skull was the first discovery of a female Homo erectus.
It suggests mankind's upright ancestors may have been physiologically closer to modern gorillas and chimpanzees, which also exhibit big differences in size between males and females, than had been supposed.
"Prior to the discovery of the new specimens, scientists did not know that Homo erectus males were far larger than the females," said Dr Emma Mbua, one of the team.
"This sexual dimorphism is considered a primitive character because it occurs in other apes," she said, standing in front of the bones at Kenya's National Museum.
She said this could also mean the sexual behavior of Homo erectus was more like that of apes, where individuals, especially males, mate with several partners, sometimes in a few hours, than that of its more monogamous human successors.
The fossils, discovered in east Africa's Rift Valley, regarded as the "cradle of humankind", challenge the idea that human prototypes evolved one after the other in a linear fashion from Homo habilis to Homo erectus, ending with modern humans.
Both fossils were found in 2000 east of Lake Turkana. But the Homo erectus skull, dating back 1.55 million years, was slightly older than the Homo habilis jawbone, which was found to be 1.44 million years old, the scientists said.
"CHANGED STORY"
This means they must have co-existed, exploiting different habitats at the same time, they added.
"They were kind of sisters, if you like," said Frederick Manthi, the scientist who discovered the fossils. "Homo habilis never gave rise to Homo erectus. These discoveries have completely changed the story."
The research, first published in the journal Nature, was conducted by nine scientists including well-known paleontologist Meave Leakey and her daughter Louise Leakey.
The scientists think both Homo erectus and Homo habilis must have evolved from a common ancestor 2-3 million years ago.
The most famous such ancestor is Ethiopia's "Lucy", a fossil more than 3 million years old that set off this week for a tour of museums in the United States.
The basic evolutionary story -- that all humans came "out of Africa" after evolving from apes in the Rift Valley around 5 million years ago -- remains unchanged and may even be strengthened, the scientists said.
"The more fossils we find in Kenya, the more we justify the story that east Africa is the cradle of mankind," Manthi said. "These hominids tell us there was a large diversity within this species, which strengthens that convention."
The researchers said Homo habilis was largely a herbivore, so would have foraged for fruits in greener, more heavily forested areas than Homo erectus, who is thought to have been a hunter who thrived in east Africa's open savannah.
Manthi said the team would have to find more fossils to confirm the findings.
"The story of human evolution has not yet been (told)," said Kenya Museum director Farah Idle. "There are many missing links. The more discoveries you make, the more questions you raise."
GGG Ping.
So they were smaller. How about if scientists answer the really big questions for us, like did they talk as much then as they do now?
The skull was the first discovery of a female Homo erectus.
Kinda assuming a lot from one specimen, ain't they?
Women have come a long way.....
How are those “human” skulls? Looks like the meat of the article implies they were surprisingly far from human. Who says they are “human”, Ken Ham?
“Ancient human fossils show women much smaller”
The good old days.
“This sexual dimorphism is considered a primitive character because it occurs in other apes,” she said, standing in front of the bones at Kenya’s National Museum.”
The ignorance of some current “scientists” is amazing. In a physical anthropology course I took 30 YEARS AGO, we learned that the males of all species of apes (including humans)are larger than the female. For someone working in the field of human archaeology to think that this size difference is a new discovery is unbelievable.
Not this one...
:)
hmmmmm.....this is NEWS? crikey....big DUH alert. some things never change. difference now is it's called 'college' (or 'party' or whatever...).
(snort)
Now if they were only toothless and had flat heads to rest your beer on...
They were certainly easier to drag back to the cave.
LOL. I’m a robustus.
...then chocolate was invented.
I expect evidence to soon be discovered showing that Homo erectus did not create and use fire, but rather, that contemporary habilis descendents were the fire users and the ones that ate erectus for dinner.
...and all owned liquor stores...
I’ve always suspected that Barbara Boxer is a throwback.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.