Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All charges dropped against 2 Marines in Haditha killings [LCpl Sharratt AND Capt Stone]
Associated Press via the San Diego Union Tribune ^ | August 9, 2007 | Thomas Watkins

Posted on 08/09/2007 12:17:06 PM PDT by RedRover

LOS ANGELES – All charges were dropped against a captain accused of failing to investigate the deaths of 24 civilians in Haditha, the Marine Corps announced Thursday. Also, all charges were dropped against Marine Lance Cpl. Justin L. Sharratt, who had been accused of killing three Iraqi brothers in response to a roadside bomb attack in Haditha in 2005.

Capt. Randy W. Stone, 35, a battalion lawyer from Dunkirk, Md., was one of four officers charged with failing to adequately probe the killings.

"It is clear to me that any error of omission or commission by Capt. Stone does not warrant action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice," Lt. Gen. James Mattis wrote.

Earlier Thursday, the Marine Corps announced that charges had been dismissed against Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt, who was accused of murdering three brothers in the assault.

"The evidence does not support a referral to a court-martial," Lt. Gen. James Mattis wrote in his written decision in the Sharratt case. Under military law, a commanding general has total jurisdiction over a case.

Sharratt, 22, of Canonsburg, Pa., had been charged with murder in the deaths of three of those killed after the bomb attack on Nov. 19, 2005.

The decision to drop the charges followed an earlier recommendation from a hearing officer who listened to evidence in the case.

In his recommendation, Lt. Col. Paul Ware said murder charges brought against Sharratt were based on unreliable witness accounts, insupportable forensic evidence and questionable legal theories.

"The government version is unsupported by independent evidence," Ware wrote in an 18-page report. "To believe the government version of facts is to disregard clear and convincing evidence to the contrary."

Prosecutors alleged Sharratt and other members of his battalion engaged in a revenge-motivated assault on Iraqi civilians after a roadside bomb killed a fellow Marine. Sharratt contended the Iraqi men he confronted were insurgents and at least one was holding an AK-47 rifle when he fired at them.

Ware said prosecution of Sharratt could set a "dangerous precedent that ... may encourage others to bear false witness against Marines as a tactic to erode public support of the Marine Corps and its mission in Iraq."

"Even more dangerous is the potential that a Marine may hesitate at the critical moment when facing the enemy," Ware said.

Mattis said he made his decision after looking at all the evidence presented at the Article 32 evidence hearing, much like a preliminary hearing in criminal courts.

"You have served as a Marine infantryman in Iraq where our nation is fighting a shadowy enemy who hides among the innocent people, does not comply with any aspect of the law of war, and routinely targets and intentionally draws fire toward civilians," Mattis wrote.

"Operational, moral and legal imperatives demand that we Marines stay true to our own standards and maintain compliance with the law of war in this morally bruising environment," he said.

"With the dismissal of these charges, you may fairly conclude that you did your best to live up to the standards ... in the face of life or death decisions made by you in a matter of seconds in combat."

Besides Sharratt, two other enlisted men were charged with murder. Four officers were accused of failing to investigate the deaths.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: courtmartial; defendourmarines; haditha; iraq; marines; murtha; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: RedRover

What a beautiful day!!!!

Keep’em coming!!!!!


41 posted on 08/09/2007 1:20:34 PM PDT by pinkpanther111 (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

We’ll always have some kooky congressman. The prosecutors are the traitors in this case, and ought to be indicted for treason.


42 posted on 08/09/2007 1:21:03 PM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Big Bump to you Red!!!!!.............


43 posted on 08/09/2007 1:27:49 PM PDT by GitmoSailor (AZ Cold War Vet===Fairness Doctrine for TV First!!!!!.....I'Am With Fred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
One thing I certainly will do. I am attending a fund raiser for my wonderful, very pro-military and presently under fire Congressional Representative. I will give him printouts of the sources listed here, and strongly recommend a full ethics investigation of Murha - what he knew, when he knew it, what was his source, and the ethical lapse of going to the press with what has been adjudged to be false accusations based on flawed interrogations, false testimony and lack of evidence.
Sue, Marines, Sue! Now, not later. If Murha is protected (fie on Congress), then sue the media outlets for disseminating prejudicial and baseless facts prior to trial. Otherwise known as slander, am I right?
44 posted on 08/09/2007 1:35:24 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (Vincit qui se vincit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Thank the Lord! Great, GREAT news!! Forgive me for asking, I have been trying to keep up, but considering the statements made with these dismissals, why is Lt Col Chessani going to court martial? Or is there just a recommendation for court martial? I thought someone said here that it would be highly unlikely for the General to go against a recommendation, yet now it’s proven in two cases there was no crime. What is the liklihood of the charges against those with hearings still pending being dismissed?


45 posted on 08/09/2007 1:38:50 PM PDT by athelass (Proud Mom of a Sailor and a Marine! Weasley is Our King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
Back again. Calling all lawyers. I understand that statements made by legislators while on the floor of the House or Senate are protected. Does that extend to statements made outside of the Legislature, as in, to the press?
46 posted on 08/09/2007 1:46:06 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (Vincit qui se vincit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Praise the Lord, He does hear our prayers. These fine Marines are heroes and I am so thankful and proud of them. I hope to see all of the other charges dropped too....let’s keep praying.


47 posted on 08/09/2007 1:49:10 PM PDT by slipper (Proud Marine mom "Prayers for our men and women in uniform")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

God Bless!!!


48 posted on 08/09/2007 1:50:50 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Oh yes, the troop supporters...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKk4pc_w1CA&NR=1

There are some who can answer to this better:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8FZ_nxmf0Y

A message from Uncle Jimbo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg2S4LNQsGA

And Vet Wagner:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCnQxtn9v9w&mode=related&search=

And Seavey:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-qBJwjSKA8&mode=related&search=

I’ll let Brit sum it up for me:

http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/18/video-hume-smacks-down-murtha-doesnt-know-what-the-heck-is-going-on-in-the-world/


49 posted on 08/09/2007 1:56:24 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Eternal Rest grant unto Donna and let perpetual light shine upon her, rest in peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatima
Be sure to tell the whole group that today's score from Camp Pendleton is...
Mustard Seeds: 2
Mountain: 0
50 posted on 08/09/2007 1:56:44 PM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

:)Will do.


51 posted on 08/09/2007 2:16:25 PM PDT by fatima (Baby alert,Baby Ava arrived 6-29-07 at 3 PM-she is 10 pounds:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Semper Fidelis.
52 posted on 08/09/2007 2:23:06 PM PDT by allmendream (A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
"You have served as a Marine infantryman in Iraq where our nation is fighting a shadowy enemy who hides among the innocent people, does not comply with any aspect of the law of war, and routinely targets and intentionally draws fire toward civilians," Mattis wrote. "Operational, moral and legal imperatives demand that we Marines stay true to our own standards and maintain compliance with the law of war in this morally bruising environment," he said. "With the dismissal of these charges, you may fairly conclude that you did your best to live up to the standards ... in the face of life or death decisions made by you in a matter of seconds in combat."

Wow! Lt. Gen. James Mattis is standing tall!

53 posted on 08/09/2007 2:23:27 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

Thanks for the links, Ali. I wasn’t be able to catch Brit Hume today but hope he covered this! (I’ve already written up Hannity and BOR.)


54 posted on 08/09/2007 2:31:27 PM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

I would think so. They do have legal standing for slander. However, I also think they have too much (if that’s possible) honor to lower themselves to litigants. The right people in America know the truth. They would take honor in that.

I would have no problem at all if they do decide to go the litigation route. Murtha deserves it. It would still be the taxpayers who pay though (as always).


55 posted on 08/09/2007 3:17:23 PM PDT by CherylBower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
"I have thoroughly reviewed and considered all of the evidence surrounding the Haditha incident and Captain Stone's conduct with respect to command reporting of and response to the incident. It is clear to me that any error of omission or commission by Captain Stone does not warrant action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice." General Mathis

It is clear to me that the tide has turned in this case and that We can expect to see more charges being dropped.

56 posted on 08/09/2007 3:32:59 PM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

That’s my reading, too. Very, very encouraging.

Insiders still expect LCpl Tatum’s case will go to court martial—where they expect him to exonerated. But that’s partly based on how unusual it is for ANY case of this severity to not reach a court martial.

These two decisions by Mattis are practically unprecedented.


57 posted on 08/09/2007 3:46:47 PM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Red, It has been a great day for the Sharratt and Stone families. It is my hope the remaining Haditha families can take joy in the knowledge that there will be a similar vindication for their Marines. I believe Lt General Mattis has taken notice of the travesty of justice that has been wrought upon HIS Marines. The allegations brought on by the MSM and political agenga of Rep Murtha cannot stand the test of the truth. Lt. Gen Mattis will let these proceedings run their due course and will do the right thing...DROP ALL CHARGES UNDULY BROUGHT UPON HIS MARINES!

God Bless Our Haditha Marines
Darryl Sharratt


58 posted on 08/09/2007 3:58:35 PM PDT by darrylsharratt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: darrylsharratt

Amen, my friend!

A very good day—and I hope you get your first GREAT night’s sleep in more than a year.

I’m just so happy for you all—and overjoyed that Gen Mattis proved himself to be the man he is.


59 posted on 08/09/2007 4:06:26 PM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I prayed and supported these Marines because I believed in them. As for Murtha, what can I say except he should be tried for treason against America.


60 posted on 08/09/2007 4:09:03 PM PDT by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson