To: Navy Patriot
One thing I certainly will do. I am attending a fund raiser for my wonderful, very pro-military and presently under fire Congressional Representative. I will give him printouts of the sources listed here, and strongly recommend a full ethics investigation of Murha - what he knew, when he knew it, what was his source, and the ethical lapse of going to the press with what has been adjudged to be false accusations based on flawed interrogations, false testimony and lack of evidence.
Sue, Marines, Sue! Now, not later. If Murha is protected (fie on Congress), then sue the media outlets for disseminating prejudicial and baseless facts prior to trial. Otherwise known as slander, am I right?
44 posted on
08/09/2007 1:35:24 PM PDT by
ArmyTeach
(Vincit qui se vincit)
To: ArmyTeach
am I right? I think you are right, but that doesn't mean the courts will give the falsely accused Marines justice.
Your point goes to the reason I am so angry with Murtha. He is not about an investigation, he is about political posturing for personal gain while doing a disservice to the troops and the cause.
He could have insisted on an investigation and refused to speculate or speak to the press about it until complete. But then there wouldn't be much to talk about and the DemoRat opportunity would have passed him by.
77 posted on
08/12/2007 2:05:17 PM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(Zimbabwe, leftist success story, the envy of Venezuela)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson